HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Seedings, games, changes, and complaints about this year's class A tournament.

Are you trying to bait the hook so people will say the seeding was wrong?

dherman8 wrote:Are you trying to bait the hook so people will say the seeding was wrong?

Not really that's been done before. What anybody wants to put best games, worse games etc.

ap4mvp wrote:

dherman8 wrote:Are you trying to bait the hook so people will say the seeding was wrong?

Not really that's been done before. What anybody wants to put best games, worse games etc.

I'll lead it off with saying again that Little Falls was deserving of a four seed. Its funny reading all of these posts about how people were impressed and how they were even a top three team at state. Where was all of this talk earlier when it seemed like only me and Angus Young said they should get a four seed?

dherman8 wrote:

ap4mvp wrote:

dherman8 wrote:Are you trying to bait the hook so people will say the seeding was wrong?

Not really that's been done before. What anybody wants to put best games, worse games etc.

I'll lead it off with saying again that Little Falls was deserving of a four seed. Its funny reading all of these posts about how people were impressed and how they were even a top three team at state. Where was all of this talk earlier when it seemed like only me and Angus Young said they should get a four seed?

Well this year it is well known now, that they should of, but didn't. I think the whole seeding system is FOBAR

All 8 should be seeded. Two years in a row Little Falls got the #1 seed, not fair in my book.

Best team won, no upsets, very good job seeding.

The best game would have had to been the MW/DM or the STA/LF game.

dherman8 wrote:The best game would have had to been the MW/DM or the STA/LF game.

agreed. i thought everything else was fine, LF getting unlucky 2 years in a row drawing the #1 seed sucks but you have to beat the beat at some point i guess, they probably should have been seeded.

deacon wrote:

dherman8 wrote:The best game would have had to been the MW/DM or the STA/LF game.

agreed. i thought everything else was fine, LF getting unlucky 2 years in a row drawing the #1 seed sucks but you have to beat the beat at some point i guess, they probably should have been seeded.

You're an STA fan, were you ever worried in the STA LF game?

dherman8 wrote:

deacon wrote:

dherman8 wrote:The best game would have had to been the MW/DM or the STA/LF game.

agreed. i thought everything else was fine, LF getting unlucky 2 years in a row drawing the #1 seed sucks but you have to beat the beat at some point i guess, they probably should have been seeded.

You're an STA fan, were you ever worried in the STA LF game?

not really but i didn't like it when they tied it up. they were probably the next best team in the class A tournament, they played hard.

Little Falls was not seeded because they lost to scc in the regular season. If they do not want to play the #1 team first. They should do better in the regular season to earn a seed.

Now explain to me how going 25-3 during the regular season is not good enough! Yes they lost SCC that hurt their seeding I believe. But are you telling me that they might have to go undefeated to get a seed. The section isn't that weak for pete'e sake. SCC, MW and LF could have recieved a seed, I believe they made the wrong chioce with SCC.

LF FAN wrote:Now explain to me how going 25-3 during the regular season is not good enough! Yes they lost SCC that hurt their seeding I believe. But are you telling me that they might have to go undefeated to get a seed. The section isn't that weak for pete'e sake. SCC, MW and LF could have recieved a seed, I believe they made the wrong chioce with SCC.

sounds like a redo
everyone back to St Paul and lets do it again

hawkfan70 wrote:

LF FAN wrote:Now explain to me how going 25-3 during the regular season is not good enough! Yes they lost SCC that hurt their seeding I believe. But are you telling me that they might have to go undefeated to get a seed. The section isn't that weak for pete'e sake. SCC, MW and LF could have recieved a seed, I believe they made the wrong chioce with SCC.

sounds like a redo
everyone back to St Paul and lets do it again

I'm game , but you'll have to call in dead to work for me

deacon wrote:

dherman8 wrote:The best game would have had to been the MW/DM or the STA/LF game.

agreed. i thought everything else was fine, LF getting unlucky 2 years in a row drawing the #1 seed sucks but you have to beat the beat at some point i guess, they probably should have been seeded.

That was a great game, Ben Hanowski showed why he is a D-1 player with his smooth hands. Best part was when he saluted the Cadets after his first goal.

Class A Recap


AA team wins JV title..............next question

LF needs to get a tougher schedule, and win. Seeding is important, no doubt. I would say that with who you play, and your record against teams that are there, you really can't complain. BTW, the CLC is a joke. You have to beat better teams than St. Cloud Tech and Apollo to argue your case.

Enough of the crying and get ready for next season. Get better teams to play against, and beat them. (This is exactly what was killing SCC a few years ago, but Johnson came in and got better opponents.)

BTW, you played SCC and lost, you really can't say that you would beat them now as you didn't get that chance.