Page 1 of 1
White Bear Lake vs Park Cottage Grove - Jan. 26
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 4:52 pm
by whitebearsuperfanB
Any possibility of the Bears being upset again?
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 5:34 pm
by hockeyfan43
no way
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 5:43 pm
by Indians forever
I hope so, but I highly doubt it!!!
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 6:41 pm
by hockeyxfan01
The last upset was because White Bear didn't take Park seriously enough, so unless they make the same mistake twice there's very little chance for another one.
WBL 5
Park 1
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 10:11 pm
by wbmd
White Bear by 3.
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:06 am
by youngblood52
You never knwo what could happen. Moser has Park playing some pretty decent hockey right now
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:17 am
by PASTRAPIDSFAN
WBL BY 2
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:10 pm
by ImissMYhockey
Last time WB and Park played , WB had players suspended and were dealing with many off the ice distractions. Park has gone back to their true colors. WB by 4
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:13 pm
by who_b_dat
My answer changes depending upon who I want to win v who I think will win.

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:15 pm
by DAREALwhitebearsuperfan
WB 3
Park 1
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 2:38 pm
by chillout
Bears by 14
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 2:42 pm
by shooter812
youngblood how can you say Moser has the wolfpack playing good hockey they've scored like 3 goals and given up like 18 in there last 5 games. Moser has nothing to work with, it's going to take atleast a decade to get the program back to where he wants it because of all the early transfers to HM and Cretin.
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 2:46 pm
by wbmd
shooter812 wrote:youngblood how can you say Moser has the wolfpack playing good hockey they've scored like 3 goals and given up like 18 in there last 5 games. Moser has nothing to work with, it's going to take atleast a decade to get the program back to where he wants it because of all the early transfers to HM and Cretin.

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 5:14 pm
by Orty
White Bear: 5
Park: 1
Orty
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 11:06 pm
by rbk101
Bears win this one 9 - 0. The boys came ready to play this time!!
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:35 am
by SECHockeyFan
White Bear absolutely dominated this game. WB goals and Park shots were probably pretty close. WB got 4 goals from Fiala and 2 from Lowell. Unlike last time, the Bears actually got the puck in the net.
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:16 pm
by SEC Scotty
Any word on the injury to Wolter. He didn't play after the 1st period. He appeared to have a leg injury. He came out before the third and was testing his bum wheel and appeared like he wanted to play. It looked like Sager told him to take the rest of the night off.
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:20 pm
by whitebearsuperfanB
SEC Scotty wrote:Any word on the injury to Wolter. He didn't play after the 1st period. He appeared to have a leg injury. He came out before the third and was testing his bum wheel and appeared like he wanted to play. It looked like Sager told him to take the rest of the night off.
Yea i don't think Sager thought it was worth the risk and it definetly wasn't. I hear it is either a thigh or groin but i'm pretty sure its nothing serious. I should find out more tomorrow so i will keep you updated.
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:30 pm
by wblsuperfan'E'
One last thing about this game i just found out today. WB had more goals then PARK had shots on goal.
WB goals- 9
PARK shots on goal- 7
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:40 pm
by whitebearsuperfanB
wblsuperfan'E' wrote:One last thing about this game i just found out today. WB had more goals then PARK had shots on goal.
WB goals- 9
PARK shots on goal- 7
It amazes me how after watching that game that we lost to that same team..
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:39 pm
by hockeyxfan01
Looks like White Bear put Park back in their place.
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:26 pm
by wbmd
wblsuperfan'E' wrote:One last thing about this game i just found out today. WB had more goals then PARK had shots on goal.
WB goals- 9
PARK shots on goal- 7
http://www.pointstreak.com/players/game ... eid=634575
According to this, Park had 11 shots in the game.
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:19 pm
by mnhcky65
SECHockeyFan wrote:White Bear absolutely dominated this game. WB goals and Park shots were probably pretty close. WB got 4 goals from Fiala and 2 from Lowell. Unlike last time, the Bears actually got the puck in the net.
Swanson also had 2 goals, and almost thee 3rd at the end of the game.