HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Minnesota Hockey has a vice-presidency position coming open.
I have been asked to run.
Who would you like in the position?

elliott70 wrote:Minnesota Hockey has a vice-presidency position coming open.
I have been asked to run.
Who would you like in the position?

If it can somehow benefit me (state tourney tickets, free ice time, sweatshirts, etc.), you'll have earned the endorsement of Govs93.

Govs93 wrote:

elliott70 wrote:Minnesota Hockey has a vice-presidency position coming open.
I have been asked to run.
Who would you like in the position?

If it can somehow benefit me (state tourney tickets, free ice time, sweatshirts, etc.), you'll have earned the endorsement of Govs93.

Yeah, we're not supposed to talk politics, so I can't make any promises to you, but....

Well, you obviously have the time...

I can't believe the special interest groups are already after you.
Wait this is the bored....yes I can

elliott70 wrote:Minnesota Hockey has a vice-presidency position coming open.
I have been asked to run.
Who would you like in the position?

Hey Elliott, are you "some other dumb a**" on this poll?....

He gets my vote!...

elliott70 wrote:Minnesota Hockey has a vice-presidency position coming open.
I have been asked to run.
Who would you like in the position?

You have the support of Gold Country.

Well how long is the term?

Can't Never Tried wrote:Well how long is the term?

Are you suggesting that because of his age, elliott may not see the end of it? Is that it?!

Govs93 wrote:

Can't Never Tried wrote:Well how long is the term?

Are you suggesting that because of his age, elliott may not see the end of it? Is that it?!

Hilary should be available soon.

I see PB got a vote.

Can't Never Tried wrote:Well how long is the term?

Term is 3 years. So I would still be under 90.

elliott70 wrote:

Can't Never Tried wrote:Well how long is the term?

Term is 3 years. So I would still be under 90.

Well then....... I'd be happy to endosre Mr. elliott70



Of course some lobbying wouldn't hurt either,


if ya catch my drift [/img]

I would usually be happy to vote for a flannel, but since my return to the city area is going to happen during this term, I feel I must vote for a cidiot. They will best serve my interests and not give into those outstate whiners.

Of course some lobbying wouldn't hurt either,

CNT, you cidiot. To folks up north, "lobby" is one of these:<click here>

And, if you really want to influence elliot, try using this instead:

PanthersIn2011 wrote:

Of course some lobbying wouldn't hurt either,

CNT, you cidiot. To folks up north, "lobby" is one of these:<click here>

And, if you really want to influence elliot, try using this instead:

Already the mud slinging starts

Flannel isn't far from stripes........You get my support.

theref wrote:Flannel isn't far from stripes........You get my support.

They're miles apart!

What the hell are you looking at out there?!?!

Just remember we will be in Aruba while you hold down the state of hockey.

VOTE FOR ELLIOTT!

Stealth wrote:

Just remember we will be in Aruba while you hold down the state of hockey.

VOTE FOR ELLIOTT!

Thank you for your support.

If I win, I promise I will be in Aruba with you.

(and your wife/girl friend)

elliott70 wrote:

Stealth wrote:

Just remember we will be in Aruba while you hold down the state of hockey.

VOTE FOR ELLIOTT!

Thank you for your support.

If I win, I promise I will be in Aruba with you.

(and your wife/girl friend)

Spoken like a true politician.

Not so fast, boys. Wait a minute here, before everybody jumps on the Elliott bandwagon, shouldn't we find out a little more about him and his principles. Just as we wouldn't vote for a candidate just because she wears a pant suit, we probably shouldn't vote for a VP just because he wears a flannel shirt.

Suppose USA hockey gets the wild idea that in the name of safety, everyone inside an hockey arena should wear a helmet (in case of flying pucks), would you march in lock step with them and propose to pass the silly rule,......or would you stand up to them, on the principle that people can decide for themselves if protection is necessary, or not.

Elliott, lets get your view on this, it will help us decide if the flannel shirt represents common sense,....or just the good 'ol boys club.

Knowlzee wrote:Not so fast, boys. Wait a minute here, before everybody jumps on the Elliott bandwagon, shouldn't we find out a little more about him and his principles. Just as we wouldn't vote for a candidate just because she wears a pant suit, we probably shouldn't vote for a VP just because he wears a flannel shirt.

Suppose USA hockey gets the wild idea that in the name of safety, everyone inside an hockey arena should wear a helmet (in case of flying pucks), would you march in lock step with them and propose to pass the silly rule,......or would you stand up to them, on the principle that people can decide for themselves if protection is necessary, or not.

Elliott, lets get your view on this, it will help us decide if the flannel shirt represents common sense,....or just the good 'ol boys club.

First, I am a FIRM believer in Victoria Principle, or is that Secrets, what ever, let me reassure you, I am firm.

Second, as I told Mr Ron DeGregorio, I fully support USA Hockey as long as they stay out of the way of me, I mean MN Hockey.

Third, helmets, yes, I have stock in helmet companies, no wait, its blue puck, not that's not it....

Well, believe me, I am an American Patriot.

I hope that helps.