Page 33 of 37

Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 10:25 pm
by dipseydoodle17
tpshockey30 wrote:RW pretty much shot it into the chest of him 80% of the time.
...due to great positioning

Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 10:27 pm
by TheCaptain
TheCaptain wrote:
*MatthewFashion* wrote:
TheCaptain wrote: Why is this a joke? They were seeded last in the section and their record was horrible this year. I don't think they need you to point out that they need to improve their game for next year. I have to give East credit if they really faced close to 60 shots and only allowed 14, that was a good game for them this year.
Let's think about this buddy. Usually when a team beats another team by 14 goals its considered a joke. RW could have beat this team 3 on 5 with no goalie. I wouldn't even consider a 75% save percentage a siv... that's more like a toilet seat lettin all that sh** in.
Yeah, you really missed my point THEY KNOW THEY ARE BAD, why rub it in....IT'S THE WORST TEAM IN OUR SECTION...Red Wing is a good team, they don't need fans to act like it should have been a closer game. From what I heard, they could have sat the top line through the second period. BIG DEAL!! I can't wait until your team gets sat on their cans by some of the better teams in the section. Regardless I want to see our section take state.
Your season is over....try again next year

Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 10:36 pm
by doubleOHseven
davey wrote: Will the guns of NP be able to handle the added pressure of having some additional "EYES" watching them. Rumor has it several prominent WCHA head coaches will be in the building...tDon, Jutts etc.
I sat next to Lucia at the game. He did not seem thoroughly impressed with anyone. All I kept hearing was this and that about the Gophs.

Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 10:58 pm
by NippenTopChed08
doubleOHseven wrote:
davey wrote: Will the guns of NP be able to handle the added pressure of having some additional "EYES" watching them. Rumor has it several prominent WCHA head coaches will be in the building...tDon, Jutts etc.
I sat next to Lucia at the game. He did not seem thoroughly impressed with anyone. All I kept hearing was this and that about the Gophs.
I was thinking about going up to him and asking "So the gophs gonna win it all this year? I mean you guys seem to be doing really good this year."

that would have been mean though

Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 11:07 pm
by goldy313
[quote="doubleOHseven"][quote="davey"]

I sat next to Lucia at the game. He did not seem thoroughly impressed with anyone. [quote]

Was referring to New Prague or the Gophers :oops: ?

Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 11:08 pm
by Jim9000
WOW ...I sure bit it hard on my lorudes/lacresent prediction.

12-2 Lourdes must have smoked them bad. makes me wonder why I picked a team that I never had seen play, they sure had me fooled. I should have known whe I saw their schedule.

Ayways, West and Albert Lea will be a CLASSIC. I will not miss that game. Both teams are on a roll.


Prediction
West 3-1 (en)
Lourdes 5-4 (ot)

* if I even deserve one after my lourdes/lacresent pic, HEY 3/4 not bad.

Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 11:17 pm
by NippenTopChed08
My Predictions for this Saturday

There will be some of the greatest hockey southern minnesota has ever seen played.

I say

AL 3-2 (2ot)
Lourdes (6-5 Last minute of regulation)

I think both games will be absolutely phenomenal.

Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 11:48 pm
by hockeyfan_atic
fairbo actually kind of gave west a scare for about a period

predictions for saturday:

Lourdes 3 NP 4 (OT)

AL 1 West 2 (OT)

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:07 am
by Tigerpride2
AL 3
West 2

might as well not stop now... lets pack the rec eh?

Can anyone confirm game times? I know AL and West play at 6 but how about Lourdes?

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 1:29 am
by iloveburritos
this weekend will be nuts! these games are going to be classic!

New Prague 4 Lourdes 2 (empty net)

West 4 Albert Lea 3 OT

i think whoever will win the west/albert lea game i believe will win the section.

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 7:39 am
by dipseydoodle17
Tigerpride2 wrote:AL 3
West 2

might as well not stop now... lets pack the rec eh?

Can anyone confirm game times? I know AL and West play at 6 but how about Lourdes?
Lourdes vs NP is at 12 on saturday

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:09 am
by gabT
Anyone know who played in net for AL?
Or who they will play against West?

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:15 am
by franchize_03
TheCaptain wrote:
TheCaptain wrote:
*MatthewFashion* wrote: Let's think about this buddy. Usually when a team beats another team by 14 goals its considered a joke. RW could have beat this team 3 on 5 with no goalie. I wouldn't even consider a 75% save percentage a siv... that's more like a toilet seat lettin all that sh** in.
Yeah, you really missed my point THEY KNOW THEY ARE BAD, why rub it in....IT'S THE WORST TEAM IN OUR SECTION...Red Wing is a good team, they don't need fans to act like it should have been a closer game. From what I heard, they could have sat the top line through the second period. BIG DEAL!! I can't wait until your team gets sat on their cans by some of the better teams in the section. Regardless I want to see our section take state.
Your season is over....try again next year
Ur a douche

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:26 am
by icelevel
[quote="franchize_03"][quote="TheCaptain"][quote="TheCaptain"][quote="*MatthewFashion*"][quote="TheCaptain"][quote="*MatthewFashion*"]RW 14 ME 0. This was a complete joke. RW scored 8 goals in the second and the top line didnt even see any ice in the third period.[/quote]
Why is this a joke? They were seeded last in the section and their record was horrible this year. I don't think they need you to point out that they need to improve their game for next year. I have to give East credit if they really faced close to 60 shots and only allowed 14, that was a good game for them this year.[/quote]

Let's think about this buddy. Usually when a team beats another team by 14 goals its considered a joke. RW could have beat this team 3 on 5 with no goalie. I wouldn't even consider a 75% save percentage a siv... that's more like a toilet seat lettin all that sh** in.[/quote]

Yeah, you really missed my point THEY KNOW THEY ARE BAD, why rub it in....IT'S THE WORST TEAM IN OUR SECTION...Red Wing is a good team, they don't need fans to act like it should have been a closer game. From what I heard, they could have sat the top line through the second period. BIG DEAL!! I can't wait until your team gets sat on their cans by some of the better teams in the section. Regardless I want to see our section take state.[/quote]

Your season is over....try again next year[/quote]

Ur a douche[/quote]

:lol: Haha big time

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:09 am
by TheCaptain
Why? Because I am defending a team that was being kicked while they were down by an over confident "please ban me"? You guys can all pay to watch the big games now.
icelevel wrote:
franchize_03 wrote:
TheCaptain wrote: Your season is over....try again next year
Ur a douche
:lol: Haha big time

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:14 am
by AngusYoung
You've got to be kidding me - over 78,000 views on a thread about a section that has no chance to win a game in the Tourney. Keep up the good work boys..... :roll:

AY 8)

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:43 am
by franchize_03
TheCaptain wrote:Why? Because I am defending a team that was being kicked while they were down by an over confident "please ban me"? You guys can all pay to watch the big games now.
icelevel wrote:
franchize_03 wrote: Ur a douche
:lol: Haha big time
Oh no my mistake, your cool because you told a team that there season is over, could you be more of a cock, sorry mr. captain of the jv team

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:47 am
by the good side
gabT

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:09 am Post subject:
Anyone know who played in net for AL?
Or who they will play against West?


This could be a different game depending on the goalie so anyone know whos in net.

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:31 pm
by merritt29
AL 3- West 2
Lourdes 5- NP 3

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:40 pm
by State Bound
AL 1 MW 3 empty net, with that many seniors on a team you have to expect them to come up big, big night for both teams

NP 1 RL 0 OT NP is the hottest team coming into the tourney, expect a big night from ambrose and the lapics

championship round goes into overtime, these teams met in west's first game with west on top 7-1, but that was early. NP has been on fire and will be out for blood

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:40 pm
by hockeyfan_atic
AngusYoung wrote:You've got to be kidding me - over 78,000 views on a thread about a section that has no chance to win a game in the Tourney. Keep up the good work boys..... :roll:

AY 8)
haha :wink:

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 1:06 pm
by NippenTopChed08
hockeyfan_atic wrote:
AngusYoung wrote:You've got to be kidding me - over 78,000 views on a thread about a section that has no chance to win a game in the Tourney. Keep up the good work boys..... :roll:

AY 8)
haha :wink:
I hope that was a joke. Seeing as whoever wins this section, there is no way they will go 2 and out.

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 1:10 pm
by ahsgrad
hockeyfan_atic wrote:
AngusYoung wrote:You've got to be kidding me - over 78,000 views on a thread about a section that has no chance to win a game in the Tourney. Keep up the good work boys..... :roll:

AY 8)
haha :wink:
Alright...People still dont seem to understand this. If your looking through all these threads at least know something about hockey this year. 1A is one of the top sections this year.

Lets Play Hockey Ranks:
6. West
8. AL
12. Lourdes
13. NP
19. Red Wing

Page Stat:
4. West
10. Lourdes
13. AL
16. NP
21. RW

Minnesota-Scores:
2. Lourdes
5. West
7. AL
16. NP
21. RW

Your right...terrible section...make them forfeit all games in the tourney.

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 1:20 pm
by Dog_Log17
I could not have said it better ahsgrad. Amen!! Go Scarlets!!

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 1:32 pm
by Where_is_the_bridge?
Statebound I like your picks for the games, but i'm gonna change one thing NP 4 RL 2, I just don't think only one goal will be scored in that game with both teams being very offensive.