Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:36 pm
golfreak and hockeystar... why have you picked luverne over new ulm? i havent heard much about luverne except that they have beat marshall but what else?
HighSchoolHockeyForums.com
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://ushsho.com/forums/
Section 1A
Page 31 of 55
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:54 pm
How do you keep from laughing when you pick Luverne over New Ulm. What is your reasoning?? We just got done playing SCC losing 2-1 are you saying Luverne is as good as SCC? You guys are very funny.
Tomorrow
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:47 pm
Tomorrow should be interesting. The lower seeds with definitly play their hearts out to keep their seasons alive, maybe even making some games out of it!
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:47 pm
Nothing else. Luverne hasn't beaten any team other than Marshall with a winning record. We all are looking for the one upset but sorry Luverne this won't be it. Top seeds will all win Thursday and Saturday will be very interesting at GACGrizwald wrote:golfreak and hockeystar... why have you picked luverne over new ulm? i havent heard much about luverne except that they have beat marshall but what else?
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:52 pm
Grizwald,
Luverne has a goaltender that can catch fire. He single handedly won that game for them against Marshall. Any time a team has a hot tender, anything can happen. These are just predictions...
Luverne has a goaltender that can catch fire. He single handedly won that game for them against Marshall. Any time a team has a hot tender, anything can happen. These are just predictions...
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:56 pm
Good luck to all teams! Here is my predictions:
AL-8
Waseca-2
Mankato West-7
Windom-1
New Ulm-3
Luverne-1
Marshall-4
Austin-1
AL-8
Waseca-2
Mankato West-7
Windom-1
New Ulm-3
Luverne-1
Marshall-4
Austin-1
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 11:10 pm
AL 8
Waseca 2
West 9
Windom 2
New Ulm 4
Luverne 1
Marshall 7
Austin 1
Waseca 2
West 9
Windom 2
New Ulm 4
Luverne 1
Marshall 7
Austin 1
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 11:22 pm
I like SEMinnHockeyNut's picks. Now to justify the Luverne pick:
1) They have a good goalie who has potential to play great and a goalie can steal a game
2) They are the underdog which should be a motivator
3) New Ulm has had some problems this year putting the puck in the net
I still think that NU wins because they are very good defensively and and have a great goalie (not sure on the name). I don't think that Luverne has the firepower up front to beat NU.
1) They have a good goalie who has potential to play great and a goalie can steal a game
2) They are the underdog which should be a motivator
3) New Ulm has had some problems this year putting the puck in the net
I still think that NU wins because they are very good defensively and and have a great goalie (not sure on the name). I don't think that Luverne has the firepower up front to beat NU.
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 11:47 pm
i guess i'll make some predictions...
AL - 9
Waseca - 3
West - 8
Windom - 0
New Ulm - 3
Luvurne - 2
Marshall - 3
Austin - 1
AL - 9
Waseca - 3
West - 8
Windom - 0
New Ulm - 3
Luvurne - 2
Marshall - 3
Austin - 1
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:11 am
AL-9
Waseca-1
West-8
Windom-1
New Ulm-5
Luverne-2
Marshall-5
Austin-3
Waseca-1
West-8
Windom-1
New Ulm-5
Luverne-2
Marshall-5
Austin-3
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:18 am
AL 6 Waseca 2
West 8 Windom 1
NU 5 Luverne 1
Marshall 4 Austin 2
West 8 Windom 1
NU 5 Luverne 1
Marshall 4 Austin 2
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 11:22 am
Even though thursdays game favor the top 4 seeds come saturday it should be a great competition in section 1A hockey at gustavus
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 12:23 pm
I have to agree with boomer19, I don't think we'll see any upsets tonight. The higher seeds will advance. There should be 3 great games next week in St. Peter.
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 2:21 pm
AL-11
Waseca-2
West-7
Windom-1
NU-3
Luverne-0
Marshall-6
Austin-2
Waseca-2
West-7
Windom-1
NU-3
Luverne-0
Marshall-6
Austin-2
Albert Lea Update
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 7:39 pm
After one period
AL 1, Waseca 0
Shots were 14-3 AL
AL 1, Waseca 0
Shots were 14-3 AL
AL-Waseca
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 8:36 pm
AL 4, Waseca 0
7 minutes left in the game
Waseca is hanging tough but AL just has too much depth.
7 minutes left in the game
Waseca is hanging tough but AL just has too much depth.
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:15 pm
AL- 6
Waseca- 0
FINAL
P.S. Does anyone know the story on the Austin Marchall game? I heard there were some iffy calls...
Waseca- 0
FINAL
P.S. Does anyone know the story on the Austin Marchall game? I heard there were some iffy calls...
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:16 pm
AL-6
Waseca-0
shots-AL-53
Waseca-11
Marshall-3
Austin-2
Austin disallowed goal to take the lead 3-2 hmm...
Waseca-0
shots-AL-53
Waseca-11
Marshall-3
Austin-2
Austin disallowed goal to take the lead 3-2 hmm...
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:28 pm
Austin: Disallowed goal Second period - In the crease
Austin: Disallowed goal end of game - time expired
Austin: Disallowed goal end of game - time expired
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:35 pm
3-2 Marshall? FINAL? 
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:40 pm
doesnt surprise me they got 2 disallowed over in Marshall!minnhockey33 wrote:Austin: Disallowed goal Second period - In the crease
Austin: Disallowed goal end of game - time expired
ya 3-2 FINAL!
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:44 pm
Anyone know the score of the NU/Luverne game?
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:51 pm
West 6-0
New Ulm 8-2
New Ulm 8-2
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:56 pm
west 6
windom 0
20 or so shots for windom but not any good scoring chances. west dominates 5 on 5. they had about 50 or so shots. west advances to play new ulm.
anderson hurt in the beginning of the game and didnt finish...
look's like anderson and campbell are hurt for next game.
windom 0
20 or so shots for windom but not any good scoring chances. west dominates 5 on 5. they had about 50 or so shots. west advances to play new ulm.
anderson hurt in the beginning of the game and didnt finish...
look's like anderson and campbell are hurt for next game.
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:21 pm
[quote="bigbabyblue"][quote="minnhockey33"]Austin: Disallowed goal Second period - In the crease
Austin: Disallowed goal end of game - time expired[/quote]
doesnt surprise me they got 2 disallowed over in Marshall!
ya 3-2 FINAL![/quote]
bigbaby: please be very clear on the following. The refs were not in anyway hired or associated with Marshall. The truth is the high school league is who hires and brings the refs in for section play. To be honest they were about as bad as I've seen. Called off one goal in second period for Austin. It was a two on one break away with the puck sent across the crease. Puck and Austin player arrived in crease at same time. Tough not to condiser this a goal. Second potential goal was a shot that rang all three pipes. I personally didn't think this was a goal but could have been called either way. Third controversial call end of game with fans counting down. Soft shot into net with what appeared to be a goal. Marshall goalie seemed to be listening to fans count-down and quit about 1/2 second early. Fans were counting early.
I've never seen refs hit by more pucks or fall down more than these three refs. It was not a good display of officiating.
Austin: Disallowed goal end of game - time expired[/quote]
doesnt surprise me they got 2 disallowed over in Marshall!
ya 3-2 FINAL![/quote]
bigbaby: please be very clear on the following. The refs were not in anyway hired or associated with Marshall. The truth is the high school league is who hires and brings the refs in for section play. To be honest they were about as bad as I've seen. Called off one goal in second period for Austin. It was a two on one break away with the puck sent across the crease. Puck and Austin player arrived in crease at same time. Tough not to condiser this a goal. Second potential goal was a shot that rang all three pipes. I personally didn't think this was a goal but could have been called either way. Third controversial call end of game with fans counting down. Soft shot into net with what appeared to be a goal. Marshall goalie seemed to be listening to fans count-down and quit about 1/2 second early. Fans were counting early.
I've never seen refs hit by more pucks or fall down more than these three refs. It was not a good display of officiating.