Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 4:59 pm
east hockey wrote:Hey! East can use that one, too.![]()
3>0
Lee



The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://ushsho.com/forums/
east hockey wrote:Hey! East can use that one, too.![]()
3>0
Lee
Another reason they "ran it up" - they've been reading your posts.east hockey wrote:So did the first line. Didn't they?Slap Shot wrote:You cannot be serious. The 3rd and 4th lines saw plenty of ice time in the 3rd.east hockey wrote:Tonka running it up.
Hey, I just wanted Sparlimb to bring back more of my material to the Lessers forum. Glad to oblige, since they keep running short of original material. Not to mention new users. Wonder why....Slap Shot wrote:Another reason they "ran it up" - they've been reading your posts.east hockey wrote:So did the first line. Didn't they?Slap Shot wrote: You cannot be serious. The 3rd and 4th lines saw plenty of ice time in the 3rd.
Undefeated #1 gets thumped? They'll remember it even if they don't. I'm going out on a limb and I'll say these kids never forget it. Even 50 years from now when they are in their late 60s.east hockey wrote: East will remember this one if they meet at State.
I think minnscout is a mis leading title. "Lack of skilled players" Yeah they are all grinders...minnscout wrote:That was pathetic by East. I hate to say this for the East fans but you may see more of this with the new rules. If you look at any of the top teams the new rules hurt East more than anyone with their lack of skilled players. At their best they are a ground it out type team and you can't do that anymore.
Bitter, Lee? No excuseseast hockey wrote:So did the first line. Didn't they?Slap Shot wrote:You cannot be serious. The 3rd and 4th lines saw plenty of ice time in the 3rd.east hockey wrote:Tonka running it up.
Hey, I understand. They were embarrassed in the Schwan Cup and had the opportunity on their home ice against a team missing four of their top players, to return the favor. Bravo.
Lee
Bitter, Lee? No excuseseast hockey wrote:So did the first line. Didn't they?Slap Shot wrote:You cannot be serious. The 3rd and 4th lines saw plenty of ice time in the 3rd.east hockey wrote:Tonka running it up.
Hey, I understand. They were embarrassed in the Schwan Cup and had the opportunity on their home ice against a team missing four of their top players, to return the favor. Bravo.
Lee
Did I hear that this was the first and only game for these jerseys, that the kids get to keep them? Can't imagine too many of them encasing them and hanging them up on a wall.dulutheastfan wrote:Sweet jerseys by east that's all I'm saying haha now there cursed
east hockey wrote:9-3. Tonka running it up. East will remember this one if they meet at State.
Lee
Wow! You are witty.20custom wrote:east hockey wrote:9-3. Tonka running it up. East will remember this one if they meet at State.
Lee
Now East knows how Cambridge feels
east hockey wrote:Wow! You are witty.20custom wrote:east hockey wrote:9-3. Tonka running it up. East will remember this one if they meet at State.
Lee
Now East knows how Cambridge feels![]()
Lee
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
And Really , Really HAPPY!
northwoods oldtimer - care to chime in???? Their "TEAM" game didn't fare so well today. And if you want to say they had some key players missing, that doesn't say too much for the "TEAM", does it?MNHockeyFan wrote:If DE was playing in the Lake Conference, would they win it? Serious question, because they just got clobbered by Minnetonka, who just lost to Edina.
Nobody yet this year has seen DE at full strength. Ponder what theyve done with that fact. This team is good. The goalie save pct was .66 at the end of the game. This game is close or tied with Parker in net and Val in the line up. Not to mention Olson an repensky at full strength. Nobody is perfect. One blemish will do. Good game by the skippers today. Go hounds.MNHockeyFan wrote:If DE was playing in the Lake Conference, would they win it? Serious question, because they just got clobbered by Minnetonka, who just lost to Edina.
You do realize Northwoods is a Rapids fan?Neuuman wrote:northwoods oldtimer - care to chime in???? Their "TEAM" game didn't fare so well today. And if you want to say they had some key players missing, that doesn't say too much for the "TEAM", does it?MNHockeyFan wrote:If DE was playing in the Lake Conference, would they win it? Serious question, because they just got clobbered by Minnetonka, who just lost to Edina.
Yes, I do. But he recently voiced a very bold opinion about a different school's "TEAM" play. I just want to read what he has to say.east hockey wrote:You do realize Northwoods is a Rapids fan?Neuuman wrote:northwoods oldtimer - care to chime in???? Their "TEAM" game didn't fare so well today. And if you want to say they had some key players missing, that doesn't say too much for the "TEAM", does it?MNHockeyFan wrote:If DE was playing in the Lake Conference, would they win it? Serious question, because they just got clobbered by Minnetonka, who just lost to Edina.
Lee
He was yanking chains. East is one of the last teams he would prop.Neuuman wrote:Yes, I do. But he recently voiced a very bold opinion about a different school's "TEAM" play. I just want to read what he has to say.east hockey wrote:You do realize Northwoods is a Rapids fan?Neuuman wrote: northwoods oldtimer - care to chime in???? Their "TEAM" game didn't fare so well today. And if you want to say they had some key players missing, that doesn't say too much for the "TEAM", does it?
Lee