Page 4 of 5

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 6:31 pm
by BIAFP
ALSECORD wrote:Hard to gauge of course what kids to what programs were the most devastating losses, but how about Hastings?They lost 3-4 kids to Privates now there on this 20 something in a row losing streak? Haven't won in a year.

The third liners must not be good students :roll: :roll: :roll:

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:21 pm
by Zamman
As usual the topic turns to the bad vs the ugly. Actually youth hockey associations, swimming clubs, baseball teams and Marching bands are usually separate entities of the public school system. I know this because I am a member of the RHS Band Boosters Executive board. When I tried to get the High School to purchase items we need, the AD told me that because we are a separate part of the system we need to purchase the items ourselves. The RHA (Richfield Hockey Association) uses the "coaches" from the high school as a way to show support, both boys and girls. That is the extent of the High School affiliation. There is a separate board of directors and fund-raising for the Hockey Association, as there is for the High School.
Both the High School and the Association have equal chance to go before the city boards for grants in their own group, again the Band Boosters have done that.

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:33 pm
by Fargo
That skool Anders Lee left to play for Edina :lol:

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:38 pm
by Neutron 14
Fargo wrote:That skool Anders Lee left to play for Edina :lol:
Whats the name of that school? Its like a Dunwoody for bellhops I think....

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:42 pm
by carpenterguy
Sports have become top priority with many families. There is a reason so many private schools are putting very good teams on the ice, court, or field. It used to be a couple and now it's many. It has VERY little to do with education! We have become a society that values entertainment more than just about anything else.

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:46 pm
by Fargo
carpenterguy wrote:Sports have become top priority with many families. There is a reason so many private schools are putting very good teams on the ice, court, or field. It used to be a couple and now it's many. It has VERY little to do with education! We have become a society that values entertainment more than just about anything else.
Yeah way to go carpenterboy- Well, I for one go to this board for the education and very little else. Man I feel so SMRT now :idea:

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:53 pm
by carpenterguy
Fargo wrote:
carpenterguy wrote:Sports have become top priority with many families. There is a reason so many private schools are putting very good teams on the ice, court, or field. It used to be a couple and now it's many. It has VERY little to do with education! We have become a society that values entertainment more than just about anything else.
Yeah way to go carpenterboy- Well, I for one go to this board for the education and very little else. Man I feel so SMRT now :idea:
We're all refreshed and challenged by your unique point of view.

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:19 am
by packerboy
carpenterguy wrote:Sports have become top priority with many families. There is a reason so many private schools are putting very good teams on the ice, court, or field. It used to be a couple and now it's many. It has VERY little to do with education! We have become a society that values entertainment more than just about anything else.
Are you sure about that?

Is it possible that you have it backwards?

Maybe the enrollment is up at the non public schools for other reasons. Maybe people want to go to non public schools because they dont like what is going on in the public schools.

We are a society that always has and still does value discipline, religion, spiritualism , and good education. Could that be the reason that some of these non public schools are so successful?

Naaaaw, couldnt be.

"OK class its that time of year so lets get out our books and study Kwanzaa and after that we will discuss how kids go to private schools because of sports"

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 4:20 pm
by Murphy
Class sizes of 20....naw....it must be hockey!

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 4:38 pm
by Dazed&Confused
Both my children go to private schools. And it has nothing to do with sports. There are alot of private schools that struggle to field teams. Just becuase a few are stronger at one sport or another should not reflect on the true reason I pay for my children to attend. I truely believe all I am doing is the best I can do for their future.
A very small percentage of private schools do well at sports at any level.
Public schools are just as lopsided as privates when it comes to excelling at any given sport.

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 5:32 pm
by carpenterguy
packerboy wrote:
carpenterguy wrote:Sports have become top priority with many families. There is a reason so many private schools are putting very good teams on the ice, court, or field. It used to be a couple and now it's many. It has VERY little to do with education! We have become a society that values entertainment more than just about anything else.
Are you sure about that?

Is it possible that you have it backwards?

Maybe the enrollment is up at the non public schools for other reasons. Maybe people want to go to non public schools because they dont like what is going on in the public schools.

We are a society that always has and still does value discipline, religion, spiritualism , and good education. Could that be the reason that some of these non public schools are so successful?

Naaaaw, couldnt be.

"OK class its that time of year so lets get out our books and study Kwanzaa and after that we will discuss how kids go to private schools because of sports"
Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental.

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 5:36 pm
by carpenterguy
Dazed&Confused wrote:Both my children go to private schools. And it has nothing to do with sports. There are alot of private schools that struggle to field teams. Just becuase a few are stronger at one sport or another should not reflect on the true reason I pay for my children to attend. I truely believe all I am doing is the best I can do for their future.
A very small percentage of private schools do well at sports at any level.
Public schools are just as lopsided as privates when it comes to excelling at any given sport.
You're right in your statement that many people send their children to private schools because they feel it's the best place academically for their child. My point is simple and easily seen by people with their eyes WIDE OPEN!

Those of us that have been around for a few years realize that in the not to distant past Hill Murray was the only real power in hockey. Now there are MANY that are strong. Where were these teams not many years ago?
Benilde
Totino
Holy Angels
Duluth Marshall
Blake
Lourdes
Breck
St. Thomas Acd.
Cretin
Answer: Most years they were average at best.

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 5:41 pm
by hillmurray2010
To get back on topic, Woodberry deffinitly* loses the most to private schools.

*Doubt I spelled that right

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:06 pm
by wbmd
hillmurray2010 wrote:To get back on topic, Woodberry deffinitly* loses the most to private schools.

*Doubt I spelled that right
You didn't even spell Woodbury correctly - let alone digit in another thread by you.

HM Double Didget Wins


They've already done it twice, how many times do you think Hill will score in the double didgets this season?

Perhaps you should hit the books instead of being on here.

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:05 pm
by sachishi4
hillmurray2010 wrote:To get back on topic, Woodberry deffinitly* loses the most to private schools.

*Doubt I spelled that right
#-o

Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 9:44 am
by packerboy
There is a lot of discussion as to why people choose what schools they do.

Here is a recent graduate and valedictorian from Johnson High to explain it all:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj3iNxZ8Dww

For some of us , sports is a nice side benefit, but we are where we are cuz we are just plain scared.

Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:00 am
by Govs93
packerboy wrote:There is a lot of discussion as to why people choose what schools they do.

Here is a recent graduate and valedictorian from Johnson High to explain it all:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj3iNxZ8Dww

For some of us , sports is a nice side benefit, but we are where we are cuz we are just plain scared.
Unfortunately, I'm in the office today and am caught behind the company firewall so I'm unable to see this video. However, I'm sure since it's a PB contribution, it ranks right up there with many other popular conservative humorists like... uh... you know, that guy... uh... Dennis Miller, maybe, and uh... who else? Bob Hope or something? How about Mark Foley? He was funny.

But for good conservative laughs while here at work, I read through the bored and pick out the spelling errors from the highly edjukated private schoolers.

Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:24 am
by packerboy
Its the Miss So Carolina "US Americans" speech......as such. :lol:

Keep up the good work on that spellchuck.

Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:28 am
by Govs93
packerboy wrote:Its the Miss So Carolina "US Americans" speech......as such. :lol:

Keep up the good work on that spellchuck.
Isn't South Carolina in the Bible Belt?

Coincidence :?: :?: :?:


That is the greatest video in the history of video though - I'll give you that. :lol:

Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:58 am
by packerboy
carpenterguy wrote:
You're right in your statement that many people send their children to private schools because they feel it's the best place academically for their child. My point is simple and easily seen by people with their eyes WIDE OPEN!

Those of us that have been around for a few years realize that in the not to distant past Hill Murray was the only real power in hockey. Now there are MANY that are strong. Where were these teams not many years ago?
Benilde
Totino
Holy Angels
Duluth Marshall
Blake
Lourdes
Breck
St. Thomas Acd.
Cretin
Answer: Most years they were average at best.
Which proves what?

We could make a list of public schools that were average at best or didn't even exist 15 years ago that now have great sports teams.

We could also make a list of private and Catholic schools that are not very competitive and never were.

2/3s of the schools you list are in Class A.

Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:59 am
by pistol
Not going to waste time reading your responses, but to answer the thread question, I'll put it like this:

If your girlfriend leaves you for someone else, then you could say you really never had her.

Plus, if she leaves you before ever even dating you, you really didn't have a girlfriend, did you?

Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 11:11 am
by Neutron 14
The thread title is "who loses most to private school transfers". I dont know overall, but at sections I think its White Bear.

Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 11:12 am
by Can't Never Tried
Neutron 14 wrote:The thread title is "who loses most to private school transfers". I dont know overall, but at sections I think its White Bear.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 11:16 am
by Govs93
Neutron 14 wrote:The thread title is "who loses most to private school transfers". I dont know overall, but at sections I think its White Bear.
Image

Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 2:36 pm
by thetender30
woodbury, whitebear, and moundsveiw..to Hill Murray