Page 4 of 4
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 7:15 pm
by SotaH0ck14
ha yeah you are from Cottage Grove what do you guys know about class?

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 7:18 pm
by SotaH0ck14
from what i watched-- there was probably a total of 4 penalties in the Eagan vs. Woodbury game ( 6 OT) with a line of handshakes at the end of the game that took about 2 minutes to go through the whole line with players patting each other on the back and helmets from both teams
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 7:28 pm
by eastonhockey3
maybe they were just tired and that is why it took them so long to get through the hand shake
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 7:33 pm
by hansentp
ya they were tierrd??? to tierd to glide threw the line
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 7:40 pm
by youngblood52
Did Mommy and Daddy give you that comeback like they give you everything else Sotahockey??
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:10 pm
by SotaH0ck14
youngblood52 wrote:Did Mommy and Daddy give you that comeback like they give you everything else Sotahockey??
yeahhh alright?? we are sooo rich you know
that was probably the worst comeback i have ever heard
dont take it out on me im just sayin you guys have no class so i wouldnt be talkin
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:12 pm
by hockeyforevr
the woodbury comeback was bad. or was it eagan thinking they already won.
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:18 pm
by hockeyforevr
youngblood52 wrote:
Did Mommy and Daddy give you that comeback like they give you everything else Sotahockey??
yeahhh alright?? we are sooo rich you know
that was probably the worst comeback i have ever heard
dont take it out on me im just sayin you guys have no class so i wouldnt be talkin
totally agree with you sotahock14
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:18 pm
by SotaH0ck14
Eagan has had that happen to them several times this year
it didnt help that Eagan was shorthanded 6-4 in the last 2 mins either
woodbury just turned it on and scored a couple goals by moving the puck and putting their big boys in front of the net to clog it up
great move by the coach
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:41 pm
by Pucknutz69
SotaH0ck14 wrote:ha yeah you are from Cottage Grove what do you guys know about class?

And you showed so much Class when you went through the line at the end of a 2-1 game, saying " You guys are a bunch of F****** hacks." 3 games with CG and I believe all 1 goal games, physical and fast paced. Too bad guys like you are able to talk.
Nice job Danny Muck #14 Eagan. Truely classy.
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 4:58 pm
by youngblood52
we are sooo rich you know
You hit the nail on the head with that one
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:38 pm
by SotaH0ck14
Pucknutz69 wrote:SotaH0ck14 wrote:ha yeah you are from Cottage Grove what do you guys know about class?

And you showed so much Class when you went through the line at the end of a 2-1 game, saying " You guys are a bunch of F****** hacks." 3 games with CG and I believe all 1 goal games, physical and fast paced. Too bad guys like you are able to talk.
Nice job Danny Muck #14 Eagan. Truely classy.
dude i dont even play for eagan bantam A i just watch their games i played for them last year
im not danny muck dude get that through your head ask your buddy youngblood
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:39 pm
by SotaH0ck14
youngblood52 wrote:we are sooo rich you know
You hit the nail on the head with that one
a bit of sarcasm there youngblood settle down
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 3:15 pm
by i heart atum peetersun
eagan dosnt really deserve to go to regions. They got really lucky that woodbury didnt crush them. Must have been a great game by bock, but they really dont deserve it. As for the class thing goes CG has more class than Eagan but thats all i will say on that topic.
Making it right.
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:15 pm
by Pucknutz69
I called a player out (#14 Dan Muck, Eagan) on this post for his comments after a playoff game. He has PM'd me and apologized for those comments that he made to CG players after the game with Eagan. just wanted to clear it up on my end. Good Luck in Regions boys.
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 5:18 pm
by SotaH0ck14
i heart atum peetersun wrote:eagan dosnt really deserve to go to regions. They got really lucky that woodbury didnt crush them. Must have been a great game by bock, but they really dont deserve it. As for the class thing goes CG has more class than Eagan but thats all i will say on that topic.
let me guess you play for Lakeville South??
haha lucky in the game yeah right
they completely dominated the whole game (regulation but overtime was back and forth) besides the last 2 mins when there was a 6-4 advantage in favor of Woodbury a team should score when they have a 2 man advantage am i correct??
the 8-3 was a fluke from what i watched
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 5:57 pm
by hockeyforevr
that 8-3 was not a fluke. and quiet frankly i dont know why we lost i guess part of our team was not motivated idk how. but eagan did get the best of us and thats good for them. good luck in regions eagan.
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 11:17 am
by i heart atum peetersun
SotaH0ck14 wrote:i heart atum peetersun wrote:eagan dosnt really deserve to go to regions. They got really lucky that woodbury didnt crush them. Must have been a great game by bock, but they really dont deserve it. As for the class thing goes CG has more class than Eagan but thats all i will say on that topic.
let me guess you play for Lakeville South??
haha lucky in the game yeah right
they completely dominated the whole game (regulation but overtime was back and forth) besides the last 2 mins when there was a 6-4 advantage in favor of Woodbury a team should score when they have a 2 man advantage am i correct??
the 8-3 was a fluke from what i watched
You say that eagan completly dominated when they were outshot 85-25? wow you have some low standards. Its nice that woodburys goalies suck because otherwise theyd be goin to regions.
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:49 pm
by SotaH0ck14
the shots dont say anything about the control of the game
Woodbury had 85 shots or whatever becasue they would get across the blueline and fire a slapshot well they play 9 periods so hmmm that would probably equal about 85 shots if you did that for 9 periods
dont get me wrong Woodbury played great they had scoring chances yes plenty but not as many scoring chances as Eagan did, instead they would just fire it from the blueline to get a shot and change
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 2:12 pm
by i heart atum peetersun
^ ^ ohh ok makes sense.
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 2:18 pm
by keepyourheadup
I witnessed the woodbury- eagan game, yes woodbury took many long shots and yes woodbury took many shots from close in, I'm not associated with either program. The difference in this game was the GOALIE..period. The first 3 overtimes woodbury just crushed eagan and could not get it past the Eagan netminder. A great win for the blue and green and quite possibly the best bantam goal tending I've ever seen.
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:03 am
by SotaH0ck14
keepyourheadup wrote:I witnessed the woodbury- eagan game, yes woodbury took many long shots and yes woodbury took many shots from close in, I'm not associated with either program. The difference in this game was the GOALIE..period. The first 3 overtimes woodbury just crushed eagan and could not get it past the Eagan netminder. A great win for the blue and green and quite possibly the best bantam goal tending I've ever seen.
thank you
finally somebody understands the game
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 10:36 am
by niceice909
this was the big talk in the beginning of the year if woodberrys goalie is good enough to go to regions and even compete in stat and it came back to haunt them he obiously is not
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 11:48 am
by snipe0014
ok i watched the whole game too
shots 86-25
woodbury controlled the whole game. Im not saying that just because of the shots. eagan could barely get it out of woodburys zone. i can almost gaurantee that if woodbury played them 20 more times they wouldnt lose. they are a much better team then eagan in every area except maybe goaltending. But if a good goalie moves into town, i can almost be that Woodbury will be almost unstoppable in highschool