Page 3 of 6

Re: This poll.....

Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 6:55 pm
by Morris Wanchuk
east hockey wrote: :lol:

Andover? :P

Lee
You know what Lee? Thats exactly what M0 was thinking... As I did say future...didn't I? :lol:

Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 6:55 pm
by boblee
Landon Snider is that goalie for Brainless.

Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 6:57 pm
by Morris Wanchuk
boblee wrote:Landon Snider is that goalie for Brainless.
What does this mean Bob? :?: Actually their bantams are getting ready to Play Eden Prairie in about a half-hour, they gotta goalie there too. Maybe see you guys in a couple hours!! :lol:

Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 6:58 pm
by boblee
It means Snider is the goalie that Elliott could not think of.

Goggles 'da Goalie (woo-woo-woo)

Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:00 pm
by Morris Wanchuk
OK, thanks for helping elliot out then. Something tells me you ALL will remember his name soon. :lol:

Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:03 pm
by elliott70
Thanks, Bob.

Mo, let us know how that Bantam A goes.
Good luck young Warriors.

EP is pretty tough.

Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:05 pm
by Morris Wanchuk
elliott70 wrote:Thanks, Bob.

Mo, let us know how that Bantam A goes.
Good luck young Warriors.

EP is pretty tough.
Will do non-chalantly so the thread doesnt get moved to youth hockey...where BobLee rules!! :lol:

Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:31 pm
by top_shelf
elliott70 wrote:I think he meant Forest er um Cam, no um Brainerd..... :lol:

but East is going to be tough to stop, but Cloquet is capable.

And, of course, everyone's favorite.....

the gr.(TH).indians will have something to say about it.

The Warriors...Ty's got to get the ship straightened out and then we will see if (can't remember the goalies name) can carry them to the promised land.
obviously MO meant the future champs.....the brainerd warriors :D....at least lets hope so aye MO???

Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 9:36 pm
by Syd Barrett
boblee wrote:It means Snider is the goalie that Elliott could not think of.
and, by da way da goggles are off :!:

Syd 8)

Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 9:56 pm
by Syd Barrett
elliott70 wrote:Ty's got to get the ship straightened out
Hey elliot, ol' Tyrone haz da boat goin' in da right direction (not playin' musical goalies and developin' a solid 3rd line) :-$ this is a group uv over-achievers :!: Dey were not expected to have much better then a .500 record [-(

This team is a bunch uv grinders who come to play in big games and if Landon ](*,) gets hot, they could create some major problems for the elite 3 teams in section 7AA :)

Syd 8)

Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 12:27 am
by top_shelf
Syd Barrett wrote:This team is a bunch uv grinders who come to play in big games and if Landon ](*,) gets hot, they could create some major problems for the elite 3 teams in section 7AA :)
Syd 8)
If Brainerd gets the four or five (which they deserve, not so much 4) they would more then likely play Forest Lake who yes, 6-1...but lets be serious here, there is no reason why Brainerd couldn't beat them...so that puts Brainerd and Snider in a position to possibly get hot, and make a run at the #1 and #2/#3...but if Brainerd gets the 6, it will be WAY too difficult to make a three game run on the "elite 3" teams!...two games POSSIBLE

BEWARE THIS FAN!!!

Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 12:34 am
by Morris Wanchuk
top_shelf wrote: obviously MO meant the future champs.....the brainerd warriors :D....at least lets hope so aye MO???
U got it shelf_life.......
Top_Shelf prepares for the bowling tourny (again)
Image

With your help ....they'll all be seein BLUE By the way, they gotta win three and it don't matter in which order they beat them!! RIGHT??

Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 1:16 am
by EREmpireStrikesBack
Dats right. Just win baby

Image

Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 11:33 am
by Off Sides
Heh Top_Shelf. How do you figure Brainerd is going to play Forest Lake if Brainerd is seeded 4-5. The way most people see it:
1 and 2 will be East and Cloquet, 3 looks like GR unless something crazy happens, 4-5 sure look like Elk River and Brainerd the way teams are playing right now maybe Forest Lake at 5 but I think Brainerd instead of Elk River would fall to 6.
What do you think the seeds will look like?

Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 1:17 pm
by top_shelf
Off Sides wrote:Heh Top_Shelf. How do you figure Brainerd is going to play Forest Lake if Brainerd is seeded 4-5. The way most people see it:
1 and 2 will be East and Cloquet, 3 looks like GR unless something crazy happens, 4-5 sure look like Elk River and Brainerd the way teams are playing right now maybe Forest Lake at 5 but I think Brainerd instead of Elk River would fall to 6.
What do you think the seeds will look like?
RIGHT NOW IMHO:
1 CEC
2 East
3 GR
4 F Lake
5 BRD
6 ER
7 CI
8-10..........

After Brainerd beats CEC:
1 East
2 GR
3 CEC
4 BRD
5 F Lake
6 ER
7 CI
8-10.....
just thought i'd add a little more controversy to this thread :D...again all of this IMHO

Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 1:33 pm
by PASTRAPIDSFAN
top_shelf wrote:
Off Sides wrote:Heh Top_Shelf. How do you figure Brainerd is going to play Forest Lake if Brainerd is seeded 4-5. The way most people see it:
1 and 2 will be East and Cloquet, 3 looks like GR unless something crazy happens, 4-5 sure look like Elk River and Brainerd the way teams are playing right now maybe Forest Lake at 5 but I think Brainerd instead of Elk River would fall to 6.
What do you think the seeds will look like?
RIGHT NOW IMHO:
1 CEC
2 East
3 GR
4 F Lake
5 BRD
6 ER
7 CI
8-10..........

After Brainerd beats CEC:
1 East
2 GR
3 CEC
4 BRD
5 F Lake
6 ER
7 CI
8-10.....
just thought i'd add a little more controversy to this thread :D...again all of this IMHO
Brainerd and East will have to beat clouquet for that to happen,

Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 2:09 pm
by top_shelf
PASTRAPIDSFAN wrote:Brainerd and East will have to beat clouquet for that to happen,
OK...i will agree on that, but Brainerd would move into a DEFINITE four spot with that win

Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 2:52 pm
by Frequent_MN_Flyer
[/quote]

OK...i will agree on that, but Brainerd would move into a DEFINITE four spot with that win[/quote]

Nothing is DEFINITE, just ask Bruce Laroque and the '02 Rapids team. :shock:

Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:33 pm
by PASTRAPIDSFAN
Frequent_MN_Flyer wrote:
OK...i will agree on that, but Brainerd would move into a DEFINITE four spot with that win[/quote]

Nothing is DEFINITE, just ask Bruce Laroque and the '02 Rapids team. :shock:[/quote]
Very true the 02 Indians

Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 7:57 pm
by top_shelf
Frequent_MN_Flyer wrote:
Nothing is DEFINITE, just ask Bruce Laroque and the '02 Rapids team. :shock:[/quote]

yea next time i see him i will remember to do that.......... :? :? :?

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 10:28 pm
by Morris Wanchuk
top_shelf wrote:
Frequent_MN_Flyer wrote:Nothing is DEFINITE, just ask Bruce Laroque and the '02 Rapids team. :shock:
yea next time i see him i will remember to do that.......... :? :? :?
Ask him why they lost all those other years too would ya top_shelf? :wink:

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 10:31 pm
by big_thurst
top_shelf, on the other thread you're stressing that Brainerd beat Elk River earlier this year, so that should garauntee they are seeded above them, if you haven't changed your stand on this, then how could Brainerd be rated above Forest Lake? You say Brainerd is possibly a 4 seed? So you're looking at CEC, DE, FL, BRN, GR?? No. You are a bit hypocritical in your rankings.

CEC
DE
GR
ER
FL
BRN
CI
AND
ST F
NL

thirst ...ahhh

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 10:34 pm
by Morris Wanchuk
HEY THRUST

1] Cloquet
2] Grand Rapids
3] Duluth East
4] Corset Lake
5] Elk River
6] Brainerd

One can only hope GR slips down one.. :lol: :wink:

Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 7:23 am
by cloquet22hockey
1.) cloquet
2.) east
3.) rapids
4.) brainerd
5.) elk river

Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 7:29 am
by PASTRAPIDSFAN
cloquet22hockey wrote:1.) cloquet
2.) east
3.) rapids
4.) brainerd
5.) elk river
Cloquet #1 only if you beat east and barnyard