Page 3 of 3
Re: 2005-2006
Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 1:23 pm
by WBLBEARS06
there is no way roseville will be a top 10 team this year, they dont have a goalie Kriegler played 25 of the 26 games. They will be similar to Hill last season, have firepower but not enough goaltending to keep them in the game. <p>The curse lives on.....</p><i></i>
tartan
Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 2:15 pm
by tenders30
Tartan in your top ten is a bad pick they lost their hole team, except 3 players and one is the goalie. They will not be a top ten team, this year was all about the seniors. <p></p><i></i>
Rankings
Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 4:07 pm
by Hillfan
All I can say is Centennial 1? I'd have to say the clearly the #1 ranked team on paper to start next year would have to be Holy Angels. From there, I'd prolly have White Bear. I'd have Centennial, Hill, and Moorhead in the middle of the top 10. <p></p><i></i>
Unknown
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 10:06 am
by Unknown
(This post is missing and can not be restored) <p></p><i></i>