Page 3 of 3
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 11:01 am
by north*hockey
Actually it is almost a fact they were a underdog last year... And even more the year before that... just sayin
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 11:13 am
by EastMetro Hockey10
mnh21 wrote:What's funny is you all are probably obsessive dad's that don't have a life. Sorry that your team hasnt made it to state in the last 2 years. Let's not cry about it on here though.
haha i'm an 18 year college freshmen and I dislike St. Thomas as much as you do. I'm just a realist who realizes Mahtomedi probably doesn't have the talent to beat St. Thomas this year. Congrats that your team made it to state the last two years but those two years are over it's time to focus on the here and now.
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 3:18 pm
by drop the puck
Never say never in HS sports or any level for that matter. The Zephyr team last year was the underdog, but they consistently found away to win games until the last weekend.
Slam the Cadets, hate the Cadets for that matter, but they still have two State Championship Banners hanging from their arena rafters.
Mahtomedi had their best chance (ever) last year and failed to get it done. Back to back state tournament appearances with a 7th place and 4 place finish. Well ?
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 6:25 pm
by PuckU126
EastMetro Hockey10 wrote:mnh21 wrote:What's funny is you all are probably obsessive dad's that don't have a life. Sorry that your team hasnt made it to state in the last 2 years. Let's not cry about it on here though.
haha i'm an 18 year college freshmen and I dislike St. Thomas as much as you do.
I'm just a realist who realizes Mahtomedi probably doesn't have the talent to beat St. Thomas this year. Congrats that your team made it to state the last two years but those two years are over it's time to focus on the here and now.
This entire forum, not including mnh21, mutually feels the same as you, EastMetro.
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 6:31 pm
by starmvp
PuckU126 wrote:EastMetro Hockey10 wrote:mnh21 wrote:What's funny is you all are probably obsessive dad's that don't have a life. Sorry that your team hasnt made it to state in the last 2 years. Let's not cry about it on here though.
haha i'm an 18 year college freshmen and I dislike St. Thomas as much as you do.
I'm just a realist who realizes Mahtomedi probably doesn't have the talent to beat St. Thomas this year. Congrats that your team made it to state the last two years but those two years are over it's time to focus on the here and now.
This entire forum, not including mnh21, mutually feels the same as you, EastMetro.
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 10:35 pm
by johnnyquest
I am going to go out on limb here, but i am willing to bet the players that are on the mahtomedi hockey team are the same players that played mites, squirts, peewees & bantams at mahtomedi.
the mshsl does not allow s.s.m. to play a minn high school schedule, why should hill, sta, bsm, ha, etc be permitted to do so?
One only needs to look at the elite league rosters . . . . . hill, sta, bsm, routinely have 3, 4, 5, players participating. How many players on average come from the smaller public schools ? 1, maybe 2
where is the level playing field ?
sta is section 4 single A - when you think about it, shouldn't you be winning the section every year?
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 11:22 pm
by stpaul
johnnyquest wrote:the mshsl does not allow s.s.m. to play a minn high school schedule, why should hill, sta, bsm, ha, etc be permitted to do so?
Johnny, get yourself a time machine and go back to 1974. There you can debate whether private schools should be in the MSHSL. Otherwise it's been a done deal for 37 years.
Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 7:43 am
by johnnyquest
then I would have to wear bell-bottoms and platformshoes.
Chi City
Posted: Wed Feb 23, 2011 8:44 am
by BennyBratrud
By the way this post was pointless Chisago Lakes is taking it all the way thank you very much
For all who disagree you can come watch us in section finals
Re: Chi City
Posted: Wed Feb 23, 2011 8:49 am
by PuckU126
BennyBratrud wrote:By the way this post was pointless Chisago Lakes is taking it all the way thank you very much
For all who disagree you can come watch us in section finals
I am not agreeing with the Chisago section finals appearance; best of luck with that one.
But I will say that I wouldn't be surprised if Chisago did eliminate Mahtomedi.
Re: Chi City
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2011 10:19 pm
by totalonehockey23
BennyBratrud wrote:By the way this post was pointless Chisago Lakes is taking it all the way thank you very much
For all who disagree you can come watch us in section finals
So much for all of that!
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2011 10:27 pm
by No Political Connections
Goldfishdude wrote:Does Goldfishdude have a chance at dating Jennifer Aniston?
Does a polar bear crap in the desert?
Lets see. It sounds like Jennifer Aniston will date about anybody so I suppose you have a shot.
If you define a desert as a place where the average yearly precipitation that falls is very low then above the arctic circle is a desert (just a very cold one), then yes a polar bear does crap in the desert so ..............
nahhhhh, no way.
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2011 10:30 pm
by No Political Connections
johnnyquest wrote:then I would have to wear bell-bottoms and platformshoes.
And a polyester suit. A big 'fro. Those thick birth control glasses. Talk like Austin Powers.....................
hmmmmmm
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 7:27 pm
by MNpuck14
I would like to see Mahtomedi upset St. Thomas Academy for the third year straight, but I just don't know if Mahtomedi has the talent that St. Thomas does. Although I have STA winning this one, don't be too suprised if Mahtomedi upsets STA again. As we have seen in high school hockey, playoff time is a whole different atmosphere and there are upsets everywhere around the state. All they need to do is be oppurtunists, and have some out of this world goaltending by Marshall.
STA 3
Mahtomedi 2
Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2011 3:45 pm
by Factsmatter1
I think this is the year for STA to run the table after two years of section disappointment. 5-2 STA MAHT fina.