Page 3 of 4

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 2:29 pm
by mnhshockey36
bighorn41 wrote:BSM has Ken Pauly behind the bench. He is possibly one of the best game coaches around. He has 2 A Champs to his credit and took a average Minnetonka team to the AA tournament 2 years ago.

BSM 4 Royals 2
sorry but i'd rather have bolin behind the bench. one of the top coaches in the state, no questions asked.

5-3 woodbury

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 3:47 pm
by skiumah
I think Woodbury's a nice team. David Eddy is a great player. I also like #23 and, for some reason, #3 (LW on 3rd line?). #3 is small but he's a mucker, I like him. But BSM will be too much for Woodbury; BSM will win by 3-4 goals.

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 4:04 pm
by snipe0014
The players on BSM havnt played in front of such a huge crowd before.. Woodbury knows whats going on. . and i think they will come out stronger than Benilde.


Woodbury 4
BSM 2

Eddy will net at least 1 or 2

woodbury

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:03 pm
by werewaybetterthenyou:)
this is going to be a great first round game woodbury loves a big crowd and are use to playing with one everytime they are voted to loose which has been the past 2 games they have owned the teams woodbury has been playing very solid hockey i am going to say woodbury 4 - 3

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:08 pm
by Jakeness
Woodbury by 4

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:10 pm
by K Dope
Actual:
BSM 3
Woodbury 1

Hypothetical:
Woodbury with Zepeda and Cecka 6
BSM 2

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:21 pm
by komada77
skiumah wrote:I think Woodbury's a nice team. David Eddy is a great player. I also like #23 and, for some reason, #3 (LW on 3rd line?). #3 is small but he's a mucker, I like him. But BSM will be too much for Woodbury; BSM will win by 3-4 goals.
#3 is Pittman. He's a 1st liner, second leading scorer on the team and is about the same size as Eddy, maybe a little bigger. You might wanna watch a little more closely. :roll:

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:49 pm
by skiumah
komada77 wrote:
skiumah wrote:I think Woodbury's a nice team. David Eddy is a great player. I also like #23 and, for some reason, #3 (LW on 3rd line?). #3 is small but he's a mucker, I like him. But BSM will be too much for Woodbury; BSM will win by 3-4 goals.
#3 is Pittman. He's a 1st liner, second leading scorer on the team and is about the same size as Eddy, maybe a little bigger. You might wanna watch a little more closely. :roll:
Then I must have my numbers mixed up. It's definitely a left winger. This kid can't be more than a $1.50, and that's with his equipment on. Unless Eddy is that small. Whomever it is, I enjoyed watching him.

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 12:31 am
by komada77
skiumah wrote:
komada77 wrote:
skiumah wrote:I think Woodbury's a nice team. David Eddy is a great player. I also like #23 and, for some reason, #3 (LW on 3rd line?). #3 is small but he's a mucker, I like him. But BSM will be too much for Woodbury; BSM will win by 3-4 goals.
#3 is Pittman. He's a 1st liner, second leading scorer on the team and is about the same size as Eddy, maybe a little bigger. You might wanna watch a little more closely. :roll:
Then I must have my numbers mixed up. It's definitely a left winger. This kid can't be more than a $1.50, and that's with his equipment on. Unless Eddy is that small. Whomever it is, I enjoyed watching him.
You might be thinking of #12 Tyler Nowicki. He's a sophomore, small kid, I believe he's LW 3rd line but also plays some center.

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 7:25 am
by werewaybetterthenyou:)
[quote="komada77"][quote="skiumah"]I think Woodbury's a nice team. David Eddy is a great player. I also like #23 and, for some reason, #3 (LW on 3rd line?). #3 is small but he's a mucker, I like him. But BSM will be too much for Woodbury; BSM will win by 3-4 goals.[/quote]

#3 is Pittman. He's a 1st liner, second leading scorer on the team and is about the same size as Eddy, maybe a little bigger. You might wanna watch a little more closely. :roll:[/quote]


Actually pittman is no longer a first liner but he is the second leading scorer

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 9:31 pm
by wbmd
Woodbury by 1 - possibly 2 if they can get an empty netter.

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 11:00 pm
by komada77
werewaybetterthenyou:) wrote:
komada77 wrote:
skiumah wrote:I think Woodbury's a nice team. David Eddy is a great player. I also like #23 and, for some reason, #3 (LW on 3rd line?). #3 is small but he's a mucker, I like him. But BSM will be too much for Woodbury; BSM will win by 3-4 goals.
#3 is Pittman. He's a 1st liner, second leading scorer on the team and is about the same size as Eddy, maybe a little bigger. You might wanna watch a little more closely. :roll:

Actually pittman is no longer a first liner but he is the second leading scorer
He doesn't start most games as a first liner, but by midway through the first period he's playing with Eddy and Kopp, undoubtedly the first line.

post 10153

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 1:24 pm
by boblee
Winner gets Edina. Let's get it on.

woodbury

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:07 pm
by eyeinthesky
anybody from woodbury know where former coach bill moore went to? is he coaching and teaching anywhere now?

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:07 pm
by Kurdatz
OK gang, Colonel Kurdatz is going out on a limb here and saying that the dark horse wins this one.

Benilde-St Margrets: 2
Woodbury: 3 :o

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:29 pm
by Hockey Shananigans
BSM - 1
Woodbury - 0

14:26 Goal BSM Matt Bergland Assist Steve Zierke and Blake Appelhof

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:31 pm
by Cabela10
Woodbury looks tired already. #3 looks like he already lost his legs, unless he is always this slow.

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:34 pm
by Hockey Shananigans
BSM - 1
Woodbury - 0

After 1 Period

Shots
BSM - 10
Woodbury - 9

Powerplays
BSM - 0-0
Woodbury - 0-1

Scoring Summary
1st Period
14:26 Goal BSM Matt Bergland Assist Steve Zierke and Blake Appelhof

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:47 pm
by Kurdatz
This is my first look at Woodbury, whereas I've seen Benilde this year. I like this club. They read the ice well and had some very good chances in the first. What I do like is their line-of-sight per passing. They've made some very nice passes (and not all of them) past the unsuspecting Benilde D a few times...something I was a little suprised at.

Contrary to another post made here, I personally don't think they look tired. They may be tired on shift, but overall, I think they are still well poised, as is Benilde so far. Evenly matched game and I like it.

Interesting note: the Woodbury coach came from Fon Du Lac, Wisconsin's program before taking the helm at Woodbury. If my memory serves correct, Fondy won the State title in 04 or 05 while I was still stationed in Madison and I believe it was against Superior, another team that us Northerners know of as no team to sneeze at up here. So this guy knows what he's doing and sounds like he's doing a nice job there.

My ex-wife lives in Fon Du Lac....oh how many times I wish we could've bombed that house from 35,ooo ft....memories are made of this.... :twisted: Ha ha ha!!!! OK, back to hockey stuff now.

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:49 pm
by Kurdatz
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is my first look at Woodbury, whereas I've seen Benilde this year. I like this club. They read the ice well and had some very good chances in the first. What I do like is their line-of-sight per passing. They've made some very nice passes (and not all of them) past the unsuspecting Benilde D a few times...something I was a little suprised at.

Contrary to another post made here, I personally don't think they look tired. They may be tired on shift, but overall, I think they are still well poised, as is Benilde so far. Evenly matched game and I like it.

Interesting note: the Woodbury coach came from Fon Du Lac, Wisconsin's program before taking the helm at Woodbury. If my memory serves correct, Fondy won the State title in 04 or 05 while I was still stationed in Madison and I believe it was against Superior, another team that us Northerners know of as no team to sneeze at up here. So this guy knows what he's doing and sounds like he's doing a nice job there.

My ex-wife lives in Fon Du Lac....oh how many times I wish we could've bombed that house from 35,ooo ft....memories are made of this.... Ha ha ha!!!! OK, back to hockey stuff now.

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:50 pm
by Kurdatz
Sorry for the computer burp gang....on to the second period!!!

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:52 pm
by stickboy1956
skiumah wrote:I think Woodbury's a nice team. David Eddy is a great player. I also like #23 and, for some reason, #3 (LW on 3rd line?). #3 is small but he's a mucker, I like him. But BSM will be too much for Woodbury; BSM will win by 3-4 goals.
16 Taylor Kobayashi for Woodbury is kind of a hot dog :)

http://www.nathansfamous.com/_img/conte ... 452347.jpg

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 3:10 pm
by Hockey Shananigans
BSM - 2
Woodbury - 0

12:25 Goal BSM Jon Holmers Assist Jamie McCormick

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 3:17 pm
by Hockey Shananigans
BSM - 2
Woodbury - 0

After 2 Period

Shots
BSM - 29
Woodbury - 12

Powerplays
BSM - 0-2
Woodbury - 0-1

Scoring Summary
1st Period
14:26 Goal BSM Matt Bergland Assist Steve Zierke and Blake Appelhof

2nd Period
12:25 Goal BSM Jon Holmers Assist Jamie McCormick

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 3:21 pm
by ovechkid
Bsm dominated the second in shots and scoring opportunities but woodburys goalie is keeping it close. Bsm will start out the third on a 5 on 3 and woodbury will have to shut them down in order to stay in the game.