Page 3 of 8
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 3:35 pm
by Frequent_MN_Flyer
Elky 3
Jacks 1 en
Jacks are too banged up, too bad since they had such a great start.
Good luck to both teams! I don't know if I'll be able to sleep on my flight Friday night.
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 3:44 pm
by BIAFP
Frequent Brokeback Mountain Watcher wrote:Elky 3
Jacks 1 en
Jacks are too banged up, too bad since they had such a great start.
Good luck to both teams! I don't know if I'll be able to sleep on my flight Friday night.
Jacks by 3
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 3:49 pm
by Zeke16
Frequent Brokeback Mountain Watcher wrote:
Elky 3
Jacks 1 en
Jacks are too banged up, too bad since they had such a great start.
Good luck to both teams! I don't know if I'll be able to sleep on my flight Friday night. Shocked
Jacks by 3"
No more than one
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 3:52 pm
by Jacks10
cloquet-2
elks-1
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 3:56 pm
by Frequent_MN_Flyer
Zeke16 wrote:Frequent Brokeback Mountain Watcher wrote:
Elky 3
Jacks 1 en
Jacks are too banged up, too bad since they had such a great start.
Good luck to both teams! I don't know if I'll be able to sleep on my flight Friday night. Shocked
Jacks by 3"
No more than one
Just a prediction. Settle down buddy. Without the empty net goal it's a 2-1 game. I have alot of respect for the Jacks, otherwise I'd predict a large margin.
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 3:58 pm
by BIAFP
Frequent_MN_Flyer wrote:Zeke16 wrote:Frequent Brokeback Mountain Watcher wrote:
Elky 3
Jacks 1 en
Jacks are too banged up, too bad since they had such a great start.
Good luck to both teams! I don't know if I'll be able to sleep on my flight Friday night. Shocked
Jacks by 3"
No more than one
Just a prediction. Settle down buddy. Without the empty net goal it's a 2-1 game. I have alot of respect for the Jacks, otherwise I'd predict a large margin.
Are you blind Freaky?
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:25 pm
by Frequent_MN_Flyer
My bad.
I'm so giddy right now I can hardly contain myself!
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:36 pm
by DadsMoney
I watched Edina play both the Jacks and the Elks, and ER looked much stronger. Im going with....
Elks 2
Jacks 1
OT special
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:38 pm
by BIAFP
DadsMoney wrote:I watched Edina play both the Jacks and the Elks, and ER looked much stronger. Im going with....
Elks 2
Jacks 1
OT special
Shouldn't you be in the AHA threads?
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:56 pm
by ilovehockey15
Centenial might be moved to 7AA.
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 5:56 pm
by EREmpireStrikesBack
ilovehockey15 wrote:Centenial might be moved to 7AA.
And you might be cool someday...
Sarsland has said numerous times that he doesn't believe ER should be in 7 or 8 because those should be the Northern sections and a citidiot team should not come out of there. I would love for ER to be back in 4AA and play @ the Coliseum.
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 7:06 pm
by formerallstar
The Lumberjacks should take care of the Elks in this one even though they are missing TJ.
Jacks-3
Elks-0
Reid will stop Im gonna say....29 pucks for the shutout
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:16 pm
by Mr. Bender
I'll take the elks 1-0 in a 3OT thriller
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:17 pm
by dherman8
Jacks 3-1
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:23 pm
by big_thurst
Elks 3-1(en)
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:34 pm
by TomTheBomb
EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:And you might be cool someday...
Too bad we can't say the same about you, EREmpire.
It will be tough to stop Elk River on Saturday if Cloquet is playing short handed as you all say. I look for an East/Elks final.
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:30 pm
by chopchopMN
I'm thinking that the Jacks will come out ready to play. Remember theres more to the team than just Tyler Johnson.... Obviously the elks will give it there best shot but I'm thinking its not gonna be enough with Roe, Jokinen, Karlsson, and Ellingson... Just to name a few...
Jacks-3
Elks-1 (if they're lucky)
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:40 pm
by Syd Barrett
There's no way Cloquet's gonna let an
over-rated metro team beat them on their own pond
Sarsland gets outcoached in this one
Da 'jacks 4, Da Elkaholics 0
Look for Cloquet and Rapids in the finals
Sorry EREmpire, but I can't pull for citiots
Syd
CEC and the Elks
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:41 pm
by northwoods oldtimer
If these boys are healthy Roe, Jokinen, Karlsson I give the edge to CEC. The 'Elkaholics' will battle every step of the way and they have been a fun club to have around the section the past couple years. I say if the boys are healthy than Ellingson proves too much for Sarsland's club. CEC in a 3-2 OT thriller.
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:42 pm
by GophyFan18
I still can't believe Jokinen is pronounced "Jockinen".
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:44 pm
by big_thurst
What is the word on Roe, Jokinen, Karlsson, and Johnson? Did any of them play in the QF game? Which ones are suiting up on Saturday?
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:45 pm
by chopchopMN
my guess is that i was originally pronounced how you think it should be but the english language KILLED the pronunciation... Please correct my spelling errors...
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:50 pm
by chopchopMN
big_thurst wrote:What is the word on Roe, Jokinen, Karlsson, and Johnson? Did any of them play in the QF game? Which ones are suiting up on Saturday?
All of them are suiting up. Im 99.9% positive that Johnson is the only one not playing. but he will be on the bench in his gear. and yes Jokinen and Karlsson played in the QF. Not sure why Roe didn't play... Probably cause it was andover...
And why not let him rest and be 100% for the Semi's? And Johnson suited up and skated warm ups
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:52 pm
by boblee
Didn't Roe break a bone? You have to be careful about those things. If he plays Saturday, Martell and Slavik will be breathing down his neck.
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:53 pm
by Syd Barrett
big_thurst wrote:Let's see how many of the current 7AA teams would be "powerhouses" if the semi's and final's were played in ER.
Yah thursty
your Elkaholic buddies had allz they could do to beat
Lowly Brainerd
Youz belong in 6AA
Syd