Page 16 of 46
Re: 40-13 on the year
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:57 pm
by TTpuckster
Irishmans Shanty wrote:Mon Dec 17
East Grand Forks @ Grand Forks Central, 3rd game in 4 nights for the Waves, will they have everyone in the lineup?
Anybody?
Did they all play on Saturday against LOW?
Warrior, got any clues?
Re: 40-13 on the year
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:08 pm
by State Champ 97
TTpuckster wrote:Irishmans Shanty wrote:Mon Dec 17
East Grand Forks @ Grand Forks Central, 3rd game in 4 nights for the Waves, will they have everyone in the lineup?
Anybody?
Did they all play on Saturday against LOW?
Warrior, got any clues?
Christensen was not in the net for the Green Wave. As for the others, not sure.
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:29 pm
by Flin Flon
they were very shorthanded on Saturday. I heard They were playing with out Christansan (Goalie) and Wood, Vizenor, Grassel, Peabody, Pederson and M. Useldinger all who are or have played defense.
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:14 pm
by sinbombyzermancurve
Warrior18 wrote:This win means absolutely nothing. EGF was missing players and there best player there goalie. And not 5. 7 players. Go hear is a list of players missing. PR has nothin other that lerke.
MISSING PLAYERS
1. Christiason Starting G
2. Casey Wood 2nd line D
3. Nick Ohman 1st line D
4. John Peterson 3rd line D
5. Brandon Peabody 2nd line D left after 2nd peroid after the cheap shot from behind.
6. Cody Grassel. 3rd line D
7. Kody Viznor left after 2nd peroid. Best D-Man. 1st line.
So basically they beat half the EGF team. 2 of there forward were playing Defense. So to say there the better team is a joke. a 6-5 win in OT. Wait till sections.
Nice hockey knowledge, since when do hockey people call the d pairings third line d
viznor coughed the puck up all night
pr was missing mickelson and winkler was kicked out in the second, both first line players
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
by sinbombyzermancurve
Warrior18 wrote:So the game was
EGF Forwards 5
PR 6
anyone else think it is getting old about all these excuses here as to why EGF lost.
Pr can sit there and say the score should have been 10-5 because lehrke had about 20 prime scoring opertunities
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 3:19 pm
by SiouxRecruit
or mickelson and olsen arnt/wern't playing for PR..
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 3:52 pm
by Warrior18
So if park rapids best player was out. Um.. i wonder who that is? U would still have them beating EGF with there whole team? Christansen is there best player and missing him and all there D is a joke to say park is better
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 3:54 pm
by Warrior18
[quote="sinbombyzermancurve"][quote="Warrior18"]So the game was
EGF Forwards 5
PR 6[/quote]
anyone else think it is getting old about all these excuses here as to why EGF lost.
Pr can sit there and say the score should have been 10-5 because lehrke had about 20 prime scoring opertunities[/quote]
How bout u make more post then shifts u have had on jv. Rookie
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 5:01 pm
by sinbombyzermancurve
Warrior18 wrote:sinbombyzermancurve wrote:Warrior18 wrote:So the game was
EGF Forwards 5
PR 6
anyone else think it is getting old about all these excuses here as to why EGF lost.
Pr can sit there and say the score should have been 10-5 because lehrke had about 20 prime scoring opertunities
How bout u make more post then shifts u have had on jv. Rookie
umm who are you? who do u play for?
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 5:47 pm
by SiouxRecruit
[quote="Warrior18"]So if park rapids best player was out. Um.. i wonder who that is? U would still have them beating EGF with there whole team? Christansen is there best player and missing him and all there D is a joke to say park is better[/quote
haha..all their D?....they seemed to have D on the ice....not sure though
....and its not a joke...EGF did lose....no matter WHO is better...they still lost...its time to let it go.....and warrior..why are u worried about it anyhow?....ur a warrior
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 5:59 pm
by Undercover Hockey Lover
About the same kind of warrior as your warrior07...seems like everyone wants to pretend they play for the best in the section.
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 9:41 pm
by IAMAHOCKEYPLAYER
well said Sioux.
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:51 pm
by schwang17
Undercover Hockey Lover wrote:About the same kind of warrior as your warrior07...seems like everyone wants to pretend they play for the best in the section.
That's cuz they're looking for a raise in income...
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:09 am
by SB24
who isn't?
41-13 on the year
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 7:55 am
by Irishmans Shanty
Punching in the rankings for this section is getting depressing.
Tues Dec 18
Red Lake Falls (#140) @ Kittson Central (#120)
Lake of the Woods (#123) @ Crookston (#97)
Thief River Falls (#83) @ Warroad (#26), Right now it's Warroad and then everybody else
Park Rapids (#57) @ Wadena-Deer Creek (#136), The barking will continue as they stay perfect
International Falls (#27) @ Bemidji (#73), I wanted the Jacks in this one but HAL says otherwise
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 8:25 am
by Undercover Hockey Lover
schwang17 wrote:Undercover Hockey Lover wrote:About the same kind of warrior as your warrior07...seems like everyone wants to pretend they play for the best in the section.
That's cuz they're looking for a raise in income...
Shwag, want to explain that one to me, I must be feeling a little Sue Recruitish this morning cuz that was either A. not funny or B. went over my head or C. lame or D. all of the above.
Oh let's see...I think I'll pick....
D 
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 9:42 am
by greatone
Wow,
I see that Bagley brought a team into overtime. Is Morris that weak or is Bagley getting better? I see that Morris has won a few games. Nice to see Bagley didn't loose another one by at least 4 goals.
Just thought I would throw a new thread in here to get everyone off of the PR arguments
Re: 41-13 on the year
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 9:51 am
by elliott70
Tues Dec 18
Red Lake Falls (#140) @
Kittson Central (#120)
RLF
Lake of the Woods (#123) @
Crookston (#97)
Crookston
Thief River Falls (#83) @
Warroad (#26)
Warroad
Park Rapids (#57) @ Wadena-Deer Creek (#136)
Wadena
International Falls (#27) @ Bemidji (#73),
Bemidji
I will guarantee that section 8 gets a minimum of 3 of the 5 wins tonight.
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 10:10 am
by Undercover Hockey Lover
Tues Dec 18
Red Lake Falls (#140) @
Kittson Central (#120) KC usually tough at home...Go Bears
Lake of the Woods (#123) @
Crookston (#97) Pirates capture a tattered but much needed flag.
Thief River Falls (#83) @
Warroad (#26) Each teams 5 game streak goes to six.
Park Rapids (#57) @
Wadena-Deer Creek (#136) Dear Santa..I've been pretty good this year...how about it.
International Falls (#27) @ Bemidji (#73) Youso with the Hatty...message to BHS staff.
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 10:22 am
by Irishmans Shanty
Undercover Hockey Lover wrote:
Park Rapids (#57) @ Wadena-Deer Creek (#136) Dear Santa..I've been pretty good this year...how about it.
I would like to see PR to continue to run the table because as an observer of the games people play, I enjoy seeing how the hunter responds to becoming the hunted.
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 10:28 am
by Undercover Hockey Lover
Irishmans Shanty wrote:Undercover Hockey Lover wrote:
Park Rapids (#57) @ Wadena-Deer Creek (#136) Dear Santa..I've been pretty good this year...how about it.
I would like to see PR to continue to run the table because as an observer of the games people play, I enjoy seeing how the hunter responds to becoming the hunted.
Makes sense...besides I think we all know Santa knows whose been naughty or nice.
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 10:32 am
by D16Dad
Undercover Hockey Lover wrote:Tues Dec 18
Red Lake Falls (#140) @
Kittson Central (#120) KC usually tough at home...Go Bears
Lake of the Woods (#123) @
Crookston (#97) Pirates capture a tattered but much needed flag.
Thief River Falls (#83) @
Warroad (#26) Each teams 5 game streak goes to six.
Park Rapids (#57) @
Wadena-Deer Creek (#136) Dear Santa..I've been pretty good this year...how about it.
International Falls (#27) @ Bemidji (#73) Youso with the Hatty...
message to BHS staff.
What's the message you would like the BHS staff (coaches?) to get?
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 10:42 am
by TTpuckster
Now now people.......remember what time of year it is.
As projections go, Warroad is also at EGF on Friday.
EGF got hammered pretty bad by GFC last night.
It looks like Chupka is till disciplining the players.
It sounds like he is sitting them for four games, which would then mean that they are out for the Friday tilt also.
So, if we were looking for a good "measuring stick" of where EGF is in relation to the Warriors, this may not be the game that does it.
Then they do not play again until Feb 2nd.
Oh well.
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 10:46 am
by elliott70
TTpuckster wrote:As projections go, Warroad is also at EGF on Friday.
EGF got hammered pretty bad by GFC last night.
It looks like Chupka is till disciplining the players.
It sounds like he is sitting them for four games, which would then mean that they are out for the Friday tilt also.
Does anyone know why this is happening?
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:07 pm
by Flin Flon
elliott70 wrote:TTpuckster wrote:As projections go, Warroad is also at EGF on Friday.
EGF got hammered pretty bad by GFC last night.
It looks like Chupka is till disciplining the players.
It sounds like he is sitting them for four games, which would then mean that they are out for the Friday tilt also.
Does anyone know why this is happening?
I know what happend but i don't feel at liberty to say exactly what happend. two players are being disciplined for breaking team rules and will be back after the Warroad game. The other has now missed two games for also breaking team rules and still has a two games left on his two weeks.