Page 15 of 27
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 4:50 pm
by flameofshame69
Does it really matter 3A everybody in this section is garbage. When the state tournament starts this section will be totally irrelevant. You'll lose the first one 12-0 or 12-1 then you'll go over to the U and lose 8-0 or 8-1 sending you home. I saw better JV teams in northern MN then any of 3A teams. So stop posting all you 3A people and stop wasting your time

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 4:55 pm
by Thegoldenjet
You're an idiot.
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 5:39 pm
by flameofshame69
And this section is still garbage too bad the high school league screwed this up

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 6:03 pm
by sick_dangles08
well when new ulm played albert lea, albert lea had 11 players out for grades.. im just throwing that out there...
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 6:12 pm
by minnhockey33
sick_dangles08 wrote:well when new ulm played albert lea, albert lea had 11 players out for grades.. im just throwing that out there...
Albert Lea really started to play some great hockey around christmas and it's been uphill for them since..At this point i think they are playing the best they have in a long time
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 6:34 pm
by puuck
New Ulm lost to both Marshall and Willmar, barely beat winless Austin by 2, Marshall just beat them by 4. They did beat Fairmont, way to go.
One line and no "D" that I have seen.
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 9:33 pm
by SC.elite918
I no for a fact that Albert Lea had all their players against New Ulm Because i have spoken to the Albert Lea coach. And Marshall also tied Windom who New Ulm beat i believe
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 9:59 pm
by HockeytownUSA
is that all you got elite? how about some more sweet stats about how good new ulm is? they are obviously the best team in the section by far right?

3a
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 1:23 pm
by bombsquad06
We'll see who's better after Thursday night!
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 1:48 pm
by SC.elite918
Here is another fun fact for you i got off the Shattuck web page. The team New Ulm just lost to went up to Canada the next weekend to play Fort Francis
They also played Duluth Marshall Varsity and beat them 3 to 1.
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 1:57 pm
by puuck
Did they beat Fort Francis? They lost to them earlier in the month. So that makes New Ulm good? Thats not even Shattucks best team.
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 2:03 pm
by SC.elite918
I believe they split with them and no that does not make New Ulm good but they wanted more stats. So what if its not shattucks best team its the one who beat Duluth and New Ulm
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 3:23 pm
by RLStars
SC.elite918 wrote:I believe they split with them and no that does not make New Ulm good but they wanted more stats. So what if its not shattucks best team its the one who beat Duluth and New Ulm
It was a scrimmage against DM.
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:01 pm
by mnhockey09
even if it was just a scrimmage new ulm only lost 4-0 and shattuck had 1 short handed goal and scored one with 12 seconds left just some other info on the game. Any other predictions for the new ulm-marshal game thursday?
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 11:08 pm
by Innocentbystander
Also the team New Ulm played from Shattuck beat St. Thomas Acadamy. So its not like the team new ulm played wasn't very good. but Thursday should be a good game.
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 11:22 pm
by Thegoldenjet
Ya think?
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 7:47 am
by RLStars
Innocentbystander wrote:Also the team New Ulm played from Shattuck beat St. Thomas Acadamy. So its not like the team new ulm played wasn't very good. but Thursday should be a good game.
I don't think it was St. Thomas Academy in MN. The schedule just states St. Thomas. The date it was played was Jan 13th. The MSHSL will not allow a HS team to play or practice on a Sunday.
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 11:43 am
by minnhockey33
RLStars wrote:Innocentbystander wrote:Also the team New Ulm played from Shattuck beat St. Thomas Acadamy. So its not like the team new ulm played wasn't very good. but Thursday should be a good game.
I don't think it was St. Thomas Academy in MN. The schedule just states St. Thomas. The date it was played was Jan 13th. The MSHSL will not allow a HS team to play or practice on a Sunday.
Very true, and there was nothing of this sort on St Thomas Academy's schedule, therefore i don't think it was them.
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 7:22 pm
by justplay22
Marsahall 5
New Ulm 3
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 7:25 pm
by flameofshame69
How does this thread have 15 pages it doesn't take that long to talk about how you are gonna lose in the state tournament

Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 8:36 pm
by minnhockey33
flameofshame69 wrote:How does this thread have 15 pages it doesn't take that long to talk about how
you are gonna lose in the state tournament

You could probably type this in 6 other section threads too, because well, I would say roughly 7 out of 8 teams in the class A state tournament will in fact lose at least one time during the state tournament.
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 10:31 pm
by mnhockey09
minnhockey33 wrote:flameofshame69 wrote:How does this thread have 15 pages it doesn't take that long to talk about how
you are gonna lose in the state tournament

You could probably type this in 6 other section threads too, because well, I would say roughly 7 out of 8 teams in the class A state tournament will in fact lose at least one time during the state tournament.
Ya he does have a good point haha and i dont see why you guys have to come in these threads and bash this section. We have things we like to dicuss about the teams in 3a so just stay out of our thread and go talk up your team in your own thread if there so damn good.
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 9:47 pm
by Innocentbystander
New Ulm 9
Marshall 0
Marshall had 10 shots on net after the 2nd period...New Ulm had 37
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 9:56 pm
by RLStars
Willmar 4
Sauk Rapids 5
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 10:40 pm
by mnhockey09
New Ulm played well tonight. shots were 51-18 and running time whole 3rd period.