Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:36 pm
The fan alliance is not a force to be reckoned with.
Very truebig_thurst wrote:The fan alliance is not a force to be reckoned with.
HighSchoolHockeyForums.com
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://ushsho.com/forums/
7AA
Page 2 of 6
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:41 pm
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 5:20 pm
Gee I wonder why Grand Rapids would cheer for Cloquet against East?
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 5:22 pm
Well, Mr. Shot. It would be because of Grand Rapids hatred for the Greyhounds.Penalty Shot wrote:Gee I wonder why Grand Rapids would cheer for Cloquet against East?
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 6:07 pm
Gee thats a no Brainerboblee wrote:Well, Mr. Shot. It would be because of Grand Rapids hatred for the Greyhounds.Penalty Shot wrote:Gee I wonder why Grand Rapids would cheer for Cloquet against East?
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 7:30 pm
I wonder why the entire northland would cheer for anyone against East?
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 7:34 pm
Well saidGR19 wrote:I wonder why the entire northland would cheer for anyone against East?
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 8:35 pm
Because, in Rapids case, they need all the help they can get against East in the playoffs. Historically speaking, that is.GR19 wrote:I wonder why the entire northland would cheer for anyone against East?
Lee
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 8:36 pm
Umm, because they don't want any part of East in the playoffs? Just a guess.Penalty Shot wrote:Gee I wonder why Grand Rapids would cheer for Cloquet against East?
Lee
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:16 pm
This isn't true. And neither is the history peice. Last two playoff meetings (both section finals)east hockey wrote:Umm, because they don't want any part of East in the playoffs? Just a guess.Penalty Shot wrote:Gee I wonder why Grand Rapids would cheer for Cloquet against East?
Lee
#2 Duluth East 2
#4 Grand Rapids 1 OT
#1? Duluth East 5
#3? Grand Rapids 2 (2-2 midway through third)
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:38 pm
Both wins for East. Did I say or imply they were blowouts? Nope. But the fact is, I can find no instance of Rapids ever beating East in the playoffs in a quarterfinal, semifinal or section/region final game. That's 5-0. Not a huge number of games, but East has been perfect against the Thunderhawks in those games.boblee wrote:This isn't true. And neither is the history peice. Last two playoff meetings (both section finals)east hockey wrote:Umm, because they don't want any part of East in the playoffs? Just a guess.Penalty Shot wrote:Gee I wonder why Grand Rapids would cheer for Cloquet against East?
Lee
#2 Duluth East 2
#4 Grand Rapids 1 OT
#1? Duluth East 5
#3? Grand Rapids 2 (2-2 midway through third)
In fact, if you go back to 1990, East is 22-3-1 in all games against Rapids. That's a substantial advantage. Some would term it an "owning". Face it; Rapids has faired very poorly against East since the Hounds and Cloquet rejoined Section 7.
</history lesson>
Lee
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:41 pm
But, the past is in the past. Lion King Lesson.east hockey wrote:Both wins for East. Did I say or imply they were blowouts? Nope. But the fact is, I can find no instance of Rapids ever beating East in the playoffs in a quarterfinal, semifinal or section/region final game. That's 5-0. Not a huge number of games, but East has been perfect against the Thunderhawks in those games.boblee wrote:This isn't true. And neither is the history peice. Last two playoff meetings (both section finals)east hockey wrote: Umm, because they don't want any part of East in the playoffs? Just a guess.
Lee
#2 Duluth East 2
#4 Grand Rapids 1 OT
#1? Duluth East 5
#3? Grand Rapids 2 (2-2 midway through third)
In fact, if you go back to 1990, East is 22-3-1 in all games against Rapids. That's a substantial advantage. Some would term it an "owning". Face it; Rapids has faired very poorly against East since the Hounds and Cloquet rejoined Section 7.
</history lesson>
Lee
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:49 pm
I thought in the 90s rapids did fine with east the 2000s it like an omen or something
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 10:01 pm
In the 90's, East was 12-1. Prior to 1990, we're talking a different story here.PASTRAPIDSFAN wrote:I thought in the 90s rapids did fine with east the 2000s it like an omen or something
Funny thing was, when East and Cloquet moved to Region/Section 2, East didn't play Rapids for a long time. 13 years, to be exact. Rapids won two close ones in the 88-89 and 89-90 season, and then they didn't play again for three years.
Looking at the dates of those two games in the last 80's, they both happened between Christmas and New Year's, where East was involved in a tournament somewhere up north. Where it was, I don't know, but teams such as Rapids, Greenway, Bemidi and Bloomington Kennedy were involved. Perhaps someone with more history on that can fill in the gaps which I'm missing.
Lee
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 10:03 pm
east hockey wrote:In the 90's, East was 12-1. Prior to 1990, we're talking a different story here.PASTRAPIDSFAN wrote:I thought in the 90s rapids did fine with east the 2000s it like an omen or something
Funny thing was, when East and Cloquet moved to Region/Section 2, East didn't play Rapids for a long time. 13 years, to be exact. Rapids won two close ones in the 88-89 and 89-90 season, and then they didn't play again for three years.
Looking at the dates of those two games in the last 80's, they both happened between Christmas and New Year's, where East was involved in a tournament somewhere up north. Where it was, I don't know, but teams such as Rapids, Greenway, Bemidi and Bloomington Kennedy were involved. Perhaps someone with more history on that can fill in the gaps which I'm missing.
Ya after writting It i figured it was late 80s
Lee
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 10:49 pm
Yes East has been Rapids daddy. But as boblee has pointed out WE PLAY WITH EAST! No reason in hell we can't beat them especially with this Rapids team. The game this year sounded like most of East's goals were flukey. This decade has seen alot of trends broken:
Twins '02
Red Sox ' 04
T'wolves '04
Rapids '06
Twins '02
Red Sox ' 04
T'wolves '04
Rapids '06
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 10:58 pm
LOCK IT UP!!!Frequent_MN_Flyer wrote:most of East's goals were flukey.
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 2:37 am
Hey Lee, it looks like these boyz frum Rapids (especially bob-a-leweeeast hockey wrote:the fact is, I can find no instance of Rapids ever beating East in the playoffs in a quarterfinal, semifinal or section/region final game. That's 5-0. Not a huge number of games, but East has been perfect against the Thunderhawks in those games.
In fact, if you go back to 1990, East is 22-3-1 in all games against Rapids. That's a substantial advantage. Some would term it an "owning". Face it; Rapids has faired very poorly against East
Lee
Gr19 
and Freaky Flyer 
) can't take the same excretion they dish out to dem poor Worrior faithful 
Now that your a member of the "Shady Bunch" you know who the Barnyard faithful will pull for
There's no way in h'll Da Worrior faithful can align demselvez with an over-rated metro team like Da Elkaholics
Syd
East
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 6:12 am
3-22-1 that is an UGLY record against the Eastsiders OUCH! Curious to know what the Worriors and CEC's record against East might be? East Hockey there used to be a Christmas Tournament in Grand Rapids back in the late 80's and early 90's. However I do not recall East being in those tournaments but that had to be it.
Re: East
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 9:30 am
That is an ugly record.JLS 81 wrote:3-22-1 that is an UGLY record against the Eastsiders OUCH! Curious to know what the Worriors and CEC's record against East might be? East Hockey there used to be a Christmas Tournament in Grand Rapids back in the late 80's and early 90's. However I do not recall East being in those tournaments but that had to be it.
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 9:31 am
I am gonna guess that DE has a good record against a lot of teams since 1990- The biggest reason is because they have had a heck of a good team for the last 17 years. I would like to see their overall record since 1990. I would bet it is up there with everyone in the state. Jefferson, Moorhead, Hill Murray, Roseau included.
Just my thoughts.
Just my thoughts.
This poll.....
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 6:10 pm
This thread is Illegitimate it doesn't even include the future 7AA champions in the poll.
LOCK IT UP!!!
LOCK IT UP!!!
Re: This poll.....
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 6:41 pm
If it bothers you so much dont read it. KEEP IT OPENMorris Wanchuk wrote:This thread is Illegitimate it doesn't even include the future 7AA champions in the poll.
LOCK IT UP!!!
Re: This poll.....
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 6:48 pm
Andover?Morris Wanchuk wrote:This thread is Illegitimate it doesn't even include the future 7AA champions in the poll.
LOCK IT UP!!!
Lee
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 6:54 pm
I think he meant Forest er um Cam, no um Brainerd.....
but East is going to be tough to stop, but Cloquet is capable.
And, of course, everyone's favorite.....
the gr.(TH).indians will have something to say about it.
The Warriors...Ty's got to get the ship straightened out and then we will see if (can't remember the goalies name) can carry them to the promised land.
but East is going to be tough to stop, but Cloquet is capable.
And, of course, everyone's favorite.....
the gr.(TH).indians will have something to say about it.
The Warriors...Ty's got to get the ship straightened out and then we will see if (can't remember the goalies name) can carry them to the promised land.