HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Posted: **Tue Dec 19, 2006 2:44 pm**

They have a good player, their goalie. Who, IMO, would probably be the one player you'd want to be good if you could choose. Not saying they'll take it, but it would be interesting if they did.

Posted: **Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:08 pm**

Goalie doesn't seem to good. End of first marshall leads 6-0. shots were 26-3

Posted: **Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:42 pm**

chimer10 wrote:The difference there is the quility of teams... i believe it was apple valley who upset AHA last year, AV was a decent team with a couple really good players, and central doesnt have a decent player on there team... there best player would play 4th line on marshall... when that happens there isnt a chance for an upset

It was Apple Valley. Oh the pain...

Posted: **Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:54 pm**

Yes, I mistyped, I'm sorry.

Wow, I never actually expected Central to win (just had my fingers crossed) but I expected them to do better than that.

Posted: **Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:24 pm**

13-0 final. shots were 68-5

Posted: **Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:26 pm**

Duluth Marshall 13
Duluth Central 0
Final
Shots
Marshall 68
Central 5

Posted: **Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:28 pm**

Wow, Marshall out scored Central's shooting?!...that's bad.

So, goalie not good, or just zero defense or what?

Posted: **Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:31 pm**

No goalie, zero defense, zero offense...nothing was right for Central or everything was right for Marshall...Central should've stayed off the ice tonight...absolutely terrible!

Posted: **Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:31 pm**

Im curious how Central's goalie would do if he had better players in front of him. I have heard good stuff about him, but he just looks bad becuas the team has no offense or defense.

Posted: **Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:35 pm**

i think 3 of the goals were on there back up goalie during the 3rd too, so it wasnt all him.

Posted: **Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:37 pm**

I am too. Glad I didn't go check it out.

Posted: **Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:38 pm**

minyhocky wrote:13-0 final. shots were 68-5

Wowsers... Boblee was way off

Posted: **Tue Dec 19, 2006 10:03 pm**

Makes one wonder if these conference games are necessary. Would the four people who voted for DC please stand up? Although, I give them credit for the team support.

Posted: **Tue Dec 19, 2006 10:19 pm**

I think I did just because I started the thread.

Saying they aren't necessary gives Holy Angels 7 more games a year. They have to be played.

Posted: **Wed Dec 20, 2006 10:58 am**

It really wasn't that long ago that Duluth Marshall was getting blown out by double-digits on a regular basis. Let's not forget the past, or we could be doomed to repeat it. It's pretty obvious that Duluth Marshall is the much better team at this point in time though.

Posted: **Wed Dec 20, 2006 11:38 am**

Saying they aren't necessary gives Holy Angels 7 more games a year. They have to be played.

So why doesn't Lake of the Woods play everyone in their conference?

Posted: **Wed Dec 20, 2006 12:04 pm**

I can't speak to that, honestly. I am under the impression you are suppose to play everyone in your conference. Or at least in having a shot for the title, you do probably. That is probably why Holy Angels plays everyone, because they wouldn't want to get 2nd or 3rd in a weak conference just because they choose not to play everyone and didn't get enough points.

Posted: **Wed Dec 20, 2006 12:11 pm**

It is a weak conference. LOW won't schedule Bagley due to the belief, probably on both sides and legitimately, that the game would be a blow out. So they just don't schedule them. The other teams in that conference are Red Lake Falls, and Kittson Central.

Posted: **Wed Dec 20, 2006 12:14 pm**

On a side note, RLF, Park Rapids, and Kittson Central are the only section 8A teams that will schedule Bagley.

Posted: **Wed Dec 20, 2006 1:18 pm**

minyhocky wrote:HERMANTOWN 7-0

W 8-2 vs. Evelith-Gilbert
W 6-3 vs. Duluth Denfeld
W 5-3 vs. Sauk Rapids Rice
W 10-1 vs. Princeton
W 5-3 vs. Hopkins
W 10-1 vs. Superior
W 10-2 vs. Proctor

ST. CLOUD CATHEDRAL 6-0

W 5-1 vs. Sartell St. Stephan
W 4-1 vs. Princeton
W 8-2 vs. Mound Westonka
W 5-1 vs. River Lakes
W 10-0 vs. Mankato East
W 3-2 vs. Rochester Lourdes

DULUTH MARSHALL 5-1-1

W 4-3 vs. Breck
T 4-4 vs. STA
W 8-3 vs. Proctor
W 4-2 vs. CDH
L 5-3 vs. Minnetonka
W 9-0 vs. Silverbay
W 5-2 vs. Sauk Rapids Rice

Sure Marshall is 5-1-1. But look who they have played, and look who Hermantown and SCC have played....Thats how Marshall is # 2 in class A

im pretty sure that marshall has three of the same apponents as hermantown... and then they have pretty decent teams for the rest of there wins. and now you can add vriginia who is also ranked as another victory.

Posted: **Wed Dec 20, 2006 1:54 pm**

mj79 wrote:
HShockeywatcher wrote:Well, I guess we'll see what happens tomorrow night, won't we?
hey... i guess we will

Hey I guess we saw.. didnt we.. And i believe i called marshall more goals than central shots too

Posted: **Wed Dec 20, 2006 5:16 pm**

hookman wrote:im pretty sure that marshall has three of the same apponents as hermantown... and then they have pretty decent teams for the rest of there wins. and now you can add vriginia who is also ranked as another victory.

They have only played two of the same teams so far, SR and Proctor.

Posted: **Wed Dec 20, 2006 9:35 pm**

minyhocky wrote:
hookman wrote:im pretty sure that marshall has three of the same apponents as hermantown... and then they have pretty decent teams for the rest of there wins. and now you can add vriginia who is also ranked as another victory.
They have only played two of the same teams so far, SR and Proctor.

oh sorry my bad hermnatown will be playin silverbay... plus a few of the same other opponents.

Posted: **Mon Jan 01, 2007 12:26 am**

Marshall's lines

1st Line: One of the top in the state
2nd Line: Better than most teams first lines
3rd Line: may not be a scoring line, but they have yet to let in a goal, so pretty solid defense

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Central at Marshall 12-9