Page 2 of 3

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 2:19 pm
by goalieboy1
go through the motions again huh? Didnt Tartan beat Hill both times they played 2 years ago, anddd, Tartan shouldve beat Hill the first time last year at Tartan but there goalie gave up 2 very weak goals

TARTAN WILL BEAT HILL

Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 9:36 pm
by HOCKEYK009
Tartan will dominate throughout the game. I think tartan will be very strong this year

Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 10:00 pm
by HShockeywatcher
Tartan will dominate? Are we talking about the same Tartan team? Same Hill team. Hill will have a max of two losses this year in conference play and they won't be coming from Tartan. I would think they will have one just like last year. But no way it's coming from Tartan.

Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 10:05 pm
by HOCKEYK009
yes, tartan will dominate.. they will win. just believe me

Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 10:11 pm
by HShockeywatcher
And on what basis do you have to go on that? Hill has two returning players who will be going D1 and an amazing team to follow. What would make it any different than last year? If I plainly said that Sibley would dominate Hill no one would believe me. Tartan has a better chance, but not by much.

Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 10:20 pm
by HOCKEYK009
owell its just wat i think. so it doesnt really matter

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:55 am
by nova1987
first of all, if tartans best player (furne) transferred to hill murray and is playing second line i believe thats saying a lot about hill murray and there power this year. and i believe that phillipe will have a strong defense to back him up this year. cary wood wont know how to handle hill murrays power offense

Not really

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:57 am
by goalieboy1
Lechner wanted to even the lines out, if he wanted to stack them, furne and larson would be on the same line, so its not really saying alot, and i am pretty sure Wood handled Holy Angels fine a couple of years agooo

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 12:00 pm
by nova1987
yeah thats a few years ago. and believe me he would want to stack the lines this year because its possibly his last year at hill murray as the boys hockey coach. he wants to win a state title.

ummm

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 12:02 pm
by goalieboy1
I am pretty sure hes stayong ther until at least 2010. Thats when his new contract is up at least.

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 12:03 pm
by nova1987
it doesnt matter. hes going to want to stack the lines this year especially after last years 3rd place game. i believe that tartan and hill wont be an important game this year. hill will probably dominate like always and go to state and tartan will be dust in the wind to them

ok

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 12:04 pm
by goalieboy1
probably, but you never know, theres been way bigger upsets

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 12:07 pm
by nova1987
no theres going to be no upset. hill murray just crushed osseo the other day about 10 to 1. and they defeated cretin 4 0. tartan has no chance of even getting lucky against this power house of a team. if they cant beat woodbury, not even a top 20 team, then they dont stand a chance

yup

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 12:11 pm
by goalieboy1
ok, whatever you say

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 12:39 pm
by hunter
Hill Murray looks to be better than last year. The defense is as strong as I've seen on any high school in a long time. Where did these kids come from, I can only find one of those names on last years defense.

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 12:40 pm
by boblee
hunter wrote:Hill Murray looks to be better than last year. The defense is as strong as I've seen on any high school in a long time. Where did these kids come from, I can only find one of those names on last years defense.
Disagreed

i agree

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 1:09 pm
by goalieboy1
i agree with boblee, the only decent D they have is Danna, and he barely played last year.

Re: i agree

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 1:24 pm
by hunter
[quote="goalieboy1"]i agree with boblee, the only decent D they have is Danna, and he barely played last year.[/quote]

It's obvious, neither of you have watched them.

Re: i agree

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 1:26 pm
by boblee
hunter wrote:
goalieboy1 wrote:i agree with boblee, the only decent D they have is Danna, and he barely played last year.
It's obvious, neither of you have watched them.
Watch them scrimmage three times already this year.

haha

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 1:54 pm
by goalieboy1
i played for them

Re: haha

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 1:56 pm
by boblee
goalieboy1 wrote:i played for them
who did you play for?

HILL

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 2:46 pm
by goalieboy1
HILL

Re: HILL

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 3:13 pm
by boblee
goalieboy1 wrote:HILL
This year? starter or backup?

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 3:46 pm
by nova1987
dude its obvious you didnt play for hill otherwise every single post youve made is about glass and wood. guarantee your either one of those. and if you are youre not good enough to play at hill and your trying to talk up your crappy hockey team over at tartan

???

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 5:22 pm
by goalieboy1
i dont even play hockey anymore, i played in 98 on hills JV team, but i live right by tartan so i go to all of there games.