Page 2 of 3

Top 20

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:29 am
by wannagototherink
I think Woodbury should definately be a top 20 team, if not a top 15 team. They are a solid team.

Hopkins

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 11:25 am
by GinoSniper99
Hopkins lost Fink, the team. Of course they aren't anywhere near as good as they were last year. The kid had at least 75% of their goals.

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 3:23 pm
by NDsioux88
hopkins lost 5-3
goalies are weak this year
they lost two returning bantam a goalies to high school

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 3:37 pm
by TCoachF
Why are people putting so much thought into these pre-season rankings. They are based on nothing. To have Champlin Park ranked is a joke. They have 11 players after last night and they are 0-6 or 7. That being said, Blaine at #4 are 0-5-1, Buffalo is not a good team (nothing personal). Until the tournaments kick in and the league starts, these rankings are feeble. I really would like to know what they are drinking when LPH put this list together. (This comment is for all age groups, not just bantam)

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 3:38 pm
by hockey35
Somebody make up their mind...

Did they lose 5-3, or 6-3?

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 5:50 pm
by gusto
i played in it, 5-3

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 6:41 pm
by hockeyman6
hopkins bantam A goalie is a girl

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:17 pm
by puttinonthefoil
I don't get why Edina is still ranked number 1, even after losing to Centenial and some other teams. Also, why wasn't Centenial ranked number 1 since the beginning? This group has won the past two state championships, and brings back their big stud in Lovik. I know these rankings don't matter until the real season get's into full swing, and even then they are just a bunch of old guy's opinions, but if you are going to do rankings, put down the Budweiser and do them right.

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:40 pm
by hockey35
puttinonthefoil wrote:I don't get why Edina is still ranked number 1, even after losing to Centenial and some other teams. Also, why wasn't Centenial ranked number 1 since the beginning? This group has won the past two state championships, and brings back their big stud in Lovik. I know these rankings don't matter until the real season get's into full swing, and even then they are just a bunch of old guy's opinions, but if you are going to do rankings, put down the Budweiser and do them right.
Agreed.

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:46 pm
by ice00breaker
LPH doesnt know how to rank at any level of play.

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:57 pm
by SLP/SW Coach
If you all only REALLY knew on how LPH worked out and get to their Rankings - you would probably be very surprised.

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 4:19 pm
by ice00breaker
I dont care how they got their rankings, I care at what the result was

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 4:24 pm
by hockey35
SLP/SW Coach wrote:If you all only REALLY knew on how LPH worked out and get to their Rankings - you would probably be very surprised.
It goes a little something like NCAA Football (Not the BCS Ranking way either)
How do they do it?

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 5:00 pm
by gopherhockey33
if blaine really is 0-5-1, they shouldnt even be ranked. That is a horrible record for any team let alone a team in the top 5

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:18 am
by hockey35
Blaine is 0-5-1?

Who all have they lost to?

Who did they tie?

Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 6:48 pm
by hockeyman6
LAkeville South 5
moorhead 3


Lakeville South 5
fargo 2


Lakeville South 8
buffalo 1

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 1:43 pm
by hockey35
Hockeyman6, you missed

LS 1
Moorhead 8

rankings

Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 10:39 pm
by benchwarmer99
bye bye jefferson they wont be up there anymore i hear a couple loses to maple grove and to chaska but i could be wrong did anyone hear anything else?

re: rankings

Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 11:00 pm
by southernfool
Is anyone else surprised to see Brooklyn Park move up to #10 this week? Are they that good this year at Bantam A level. I don't remember them having that strong a club at the BB1 or PWA level last year. Any thoughts?

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 4:33 pm
by ice00breaker
Okay, LPH is officially retarded. Roseau #2 in state after a record of 2-2 so far. Losing to St. Cloud 6-1? Tonka 4-3. Wow. Thats all i can say

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 7:08 pm
by MNSS
what is the top 20

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:35 pm
by ice00breaker
LPH Nov. 16

1. Edina
2. Roseau
3. Eden Prairie
4. Blaine
5. Jefferson
6. Moorhead
7. Centennial
8. Rochester North
9. Brooklyn Park
10. Tartan
11. Wayzata
12. Mounds View
13. White Bear Lake
14. Minnetonka
15. Duluth East
16. Eagan
17. Orono
18. Mounds View (i guess they really like Mounds View. This proves the Budweiser Theory)
19. St. Cloud
20. Maple Grove

Roseau Number 2? R u kidding me?

http://www.roseauyouthhockey.com/2006-0 ... hedule.htm

Check out the 1st 2 scores

Come on

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 1:48 pm
by wannagototherink
ice00breaker wrote:LPH Nov. 16

1. Edina
2. Roseau
3. Eden Prairie
4. Blaine
5. Jefferson
6. Moorhead
7. Centennial
8. Rochester North
9. Brooklyn Park
10. Tartan
11. Wayzata
12. Mounds View
13. White Bear Lake
14. Minnetonka
15. Duluth East
16. Eagan
17. Orono
18. Mounds View (i guess they really like Mounds View. This proves the Budweiser Theory)
19. St. Cloud
20. Maple Grove

Roseau Number 2? R u kidding me?

http://www.roseauyouthhockey.com/2006-0 ... hedule.htm

Check out the 1st 2 scores
These are hilarious: how is Woodbury and Stillwater not in the top twenty? How is Duluth East number 15, didn't they just beat Centennial, White Bear and Eden Prarie? How is Roseau number 2? How is Moorhead so high? I don't know who does these but they are not even close to right. Mounds View? I guess Mounds View is so good they had to put them in twice. This is funny.

Rankings

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 2:00 pm
by Pucknutz69
You might have an argument for Woodbury, But Stillwater? they got beat up pretty good in the Centennial tourney. Didn't Blaine take a few beatings also? Who had Tartan played? I think Orono is getting some credit from last year. Give it another week or 2 and things will shake out.

Now that we got the HS tryouts out of the way we will get some true sights on who should be ranked and who is going to be watching in February.

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 2:11 pm
by scwho?
SLP/SW Coach wrote:Edit - you are one step ahead of me - THANKS!!!
I think Hermantown Bantam A team should be up there.

After all they are 4 - 0 with that said beating....

Burnsville
Rosemount
Duluth Lakers
Hibbing

During this only allowing 1 goal in.