HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

hockeyhockeyhockey wrote:HM school started this year a 6th grade 7th grade hockey team through the school as I understand

why would that help? dont local youth league programs get like 50 games a year?

It's not intended to help the varsity program. It's 6-8 outdoor CAA games against other Catholic grade schools teams. It's been around for decades. I think kids can play both in their association and on these school teams. Not a big time or money commitment.

Anybody know why Dylan Mills was out yesterday?

anyone see the game vs Burnsville? I was surprised to see Hill had to make a comeback and to be outshot almost 2 to 1.

I was at the game. Burnsville was the better team in my opinion. HM goalie was the difference. HM did not overwhelm me. Their name players #22 and #19 were not noticeable. #14 was noticeable. While all these other teams pound their chest and say we should #1, Burnsville might surprise some people if they get goaltending. They got some quality players #4, #17 #22.

youwannaknowme wrote:I was at the game. Burnsville was the better team in my opinion. HM goalie was the difference. HM did not overwhelm me. Their name players #22 and #19 were not noticeable. #14 was noticeable. While all these other teams pound their chest and say we should #1, Burnsville might surprise some people if they get goaltending. They got some quality players #4, #17 #22.

Hill Murray looks to have strengthened their schedule this year. Only 8 games appear to be easy, so almost 2/3 good competitive games.

HILARY2016 wrote:

youwannaknowme wrote:I was at the game. Burnsville was the better team in my opinion. HM goalie was the difference. HM did not overwhelm me. Their name players #22 and #19 were not noticeable. #14 was noticeable. While all these other teams pound their chest and say we should #1, Burnsville might surprise some people if they get goaltending. They got some quality players #4, #17 #22.

Hill Murray looks to have strengthened their schedule this year. Only 8 games appear to be easy, so almost 2/3 good competitive games.

Stick to presidential campaigns Hillary. 100% of Hill's non-conference schedule are with good competitive games. The only cake walks they have each year are against the weak teams in their conference. I mean, they can't help it if teams in their conference aren't as competitive as the rest of their schedule. The only thing they can control is how good their non-conference schedule is and they schedule as many games as they can against the top 10 teams. In my opinion, this years'schedule is very similar to most years' schedules. Weak in conference, strong non-conference.

kpryan88 wrote:

HILARY2016 wrote:

youwannaknowme wrote:I was at the game. Burnsville was the better team in my opinion. HM goalie was the difference. HM did not overwhelm me. Their name players #22 and #19 were not noticeable. #14 was noticeable. While all these other teams pound their chest and say we should #1, Burnsville might surprise some people if they get goaltending. They got some quality players #4, #17 #22.

Hill Murray looks to have strengthened their schedule this year. Only 8 games appear to be easy, so almost 2/3 good competitive games.

Stick to presidential campaigns Hillary. 100% of Hill's non-conference schedule are with good competitive games. The only cake walks they have each year are against the weak teams in their conference. I mean, they can't help it if teams in their conference aren't as competitive as the rest of their schedule. The only thing they can control is how good their non-conference schedule is and they schedule as many games as they can against the top 10 teams. In my opinion, this years'schedule is very similar to most years' schedules. Weak in conference, strong non-conference.

Captain, so you agree 8 easy games, the rest good competitive games. Thank you for the vote. Looks like a good schedule.