HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Defensive Zone wrote:

Sats81 wrote:

Defensive Zone wrote: With the current roster, I would have to agree. But my guess, there will be two to three more players who played a significant roll during the undefeated season leaving to play elsewhere by the start of the next school year. If this happens, all bets are off on a 1AA favorite.

Elaborate...

I really can't. I was just talking to my Lakeville "Pop" buddies the other day and the conversation came up. It was definitely an interesting one. Sorry!

Weak

minnscout wrote:I can tell there is a top player in Section 1 that will be moving to another section 1 team that will make a major difference.

Who?

minnscout wrote:I can tell there is a top player in Section 1 that will be moving to another section 1 team that will make a major difference.

A Rochester school loses another one. Will the goalie brother get a chance to make the team or is he staying back?

thespellchecker wrote:

minnscout wrote:I can tell there is a top player in Section 1 that will be moving to another section 1 team that will make a major difference.

A Rochester school loses another one. Will the goalie brother get a chance to make the team or is he staying back?

I heard the family is moving due to Job and family
that was with my pop buddies also

Defensive Zone wrote:

Sats81 wrote:

Defensive Zone wrote: With the current roster, I would have to agree. But my guess, there will be two to three more players who played a significant roll during the undefeated season leaving to play elsewhere by the start of the next school year. If this happens, all bets are off on a 1AA favorite.

Elaborate...

I really can't. I was just talking to my Lakeville "Pop" buddies the other day and the conversation came up. It was definitely an interesting one. Sorry!

Can you say it was Ryan Edquist now that it is public that he signed a tender with the Minnesota Magicians?

A tender in the NAHL means little to nothing. What it does mean is a first step away from the Panthers and he won't play the HS "Elite" league season.

Nuts&Bolts wrote:A tender in the NAHL means little to nothing. What it does mean is a first step away from the Panthers and he won't play the HS "Elite" league season.

I predicted that..... Like Ive said before... Hes got nothing else to prove or attain at Lakeville North. And as a transfer you cant really make the case that he has a life long dream to play with his friends/high school buddies. Goalies are and will contine to flock away from mn high school league (even the assoc director's kid left for greener pastures). Nothing in it for them to stay and play 25 games (and thats only if they dont have to throw an underclassman several games) when they can go play twice as many somewhere else. Play more games. Get better coaching. Better shots. More work. Just watch the exodus of goalies continues this year...

Nuts&Bolts wrote:A tender in the NAHL means little to nothing. What it does mean is a first step away from the Panthers and he won't play the HS "Elite" league season.

I cant think of a single goalie that signed a tender last year prior to the season that came back and played HS hockey. My bet is he plays a year in NAHL then off to Division I. Just like Perry.

Funny. Or 5 years in the NA like Kautz and then D3 or club.

observer wrote:Funny. Or 5 years in the NA like Kautz and then D3 or club.

Maybe. But Kautz didnt have nearly the hype. Guess he will find out. Put up or shut up league. Magicians went thru a lot of goalies last year

Wblhcky2424 wrote:

Defensive Zone wrote:

Sats81 wrote: Elaborate...

I really can't. I was just talking to my Lakeville "Pop" buddies the other day and the conversation came up. It was definitely an interesting one. Sorry!

Can you say it was Ryan Edquist now that it is public that he signed a tender with the Minnesota Magicians?

So if Ryan leaves, who is North's next goalie to take over?

Defensive Zone wrote:

Wblhcky2424 wrote:

Defensive Zone wrote: I really can't. I was just talking to my Lakeville "Pop" buddies the other day and the conversation came up. It was definitely an interesting one. Sorry!

Can you say it was Ryan Edquist now that it is public that he signed a tender with the Minnesota Magicians?

So if Ryan leaves, who is North's next goalie to take over?

AJ Bucchino.

Defensive Zone wrote:

Wblhcky2424 wrote:

Defensive Zone wrote: I really can't. I was just talking to my Lakeville "Pop" buddies the other day and the conversation came up. It was definitely an interesting one. Sorry!

Can you say it was Ryan Edquist now that it is public that he signed a tender with the Minnesota Magicians?

So if Ryan leaves, who is North's next goalie to take over?

Allen Flaskey?

Defensive Zone wrote:

Wblhcky2424 wrote:

Defensive Zone wrote: I really can't. I was just talking to my Lakeville "Pop" buddies the other day and the conversation came up. It was definitely an interesting one. Sorry!

Can you say it was Ryan Edquist now that it is public that he signed a tender with the Minnesota Magicians?

So if Ryan leaves, who is North's next goalie to take over?

Maybe Weaver will play for LVN since he lost his spot to Edquist

ThePuckStopsHere wrote:

Defensive Zone wrote:

Wblhcky2424 wrote: Can you say it was Ryan Edquist now that it is public that he signed a tender with the Minnesota Magicians?

So if Ryan leaves, who is North's next goalie to take over?

Maybe Weaver will play for LVN since he lost his spot to Edquist

Im sure they will have no problem finding a shattuck goalie that suddenly hs financial hardship and cant afford the tuition any more

goldy313 wrote:I like Farmington in 1AA, they'll actually have to play a section title game with winning in mind Instead of not being put in running time but I think this may be the Tigers year. Nothing against North other than conplacency.

If only I could see the stock market with this clarity......

Sats81 wrote:

blueblood wrote:Sats81

Care to respond with to goldy123 with one of your blasts?

Sure. There is no chance. How's that? In fact, I wouldn't even pick Farmington over LS.

Then of course thete is this gem

TheHockeyDJ wrote:1AA Lakeville North
2AA Eden Prairie
3AA Burnsville
4AA Stillwater
5AA Anoka
6AA Wayzata
7AA Grand Rapids
8AA Bemidji

Holy crap, nice call! 7 of 8 if Stillwater wins.

goldy313 wrote:

goldy313 wrote:I like Farmington in 1AA, they'll actually have to play a section title game with winning in mind Instead of not being put in running time but I think this may be the Tigers year. Nothing against North other than conplacency.

If only I could see the stock market with this clarity......

That is pretty impressive, goldy.

goldy313 wrote:

Sats81 wrote:

blueblood wrote:Sats81

Care to respond with to goldy123 with one of your blasts?

Sure. There is no chance. How's that? In fact, I wouldn't even pick Farmington over LS.

Then of course thete is this gem

He's probably happy he's banned right about now...

TheHockeyDJ wrote:1AA Lakeville North
2AA Eden Prairie
3AA Burnsville
4AA Stillwater
5AA Anoka
6AA Wayzata
7AA Grand Rapids
8AA Bemidji

However, this may be even more impressive.

7 out of 8 is impressive, especially pulling Anoka out of the hat given Blaine seemed one of the most probable locks in any section.

goldy313 wrote:7 out of 8 is impressive, especially pulling Anoka out of the hat given Blaine seemed one of the most probable locks in any section.

There is your new financial advisor.

#3 Grand Rapids
Burnsville

#2 Wayzata
Farmington

#1 Eden Prairie
Anoka

#4 Bemidji
#5 Hill-Murray

Rapids vs. Wayzata
EP vs. Hill-Murray

Grand Rapids
EP

Grand Rapids