Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2015 11:52 am
I'm not involved with the HS football scene. How does their system work? (I could look it up, but I'd probably have more questions than answers)sinbin wrote:You learn from football.
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://ushsho.com/forums/
I'm not involved with the HS football scene. How does their system work? (I could look it up, but I'd probably have more questions than answers)sinbin wrote:You learn from football.
Thank you for the explanation of the football system. Much appreciated. I agree with you, I don't think the system is broken either.alcloseshaver wrote:Football has the top 32 enrollment wise in it's top class, All metro teams. Eliminated conference play and all teams have been assigned a section in which to schedule opponents. Postseason remains unchanged except for some minor tweaks to the top class. Not sure what you would want to change in girls hockey, very few out state AA programs. State tournament field looks fine to me, 6AA had three good teams, most other sections at least 2 good teams. Not broken.
Extend the football cross-over concept and re-seed in the semis. I forget the poster here, but I've seen him post something similar several times, and is on the right track. Our daughters won't benefit from this, but our grand-daughters will. Change is slow and inertia is powerful, but it will happen. It solves the issue that some bring up of ebbs and flows of section strength. Some might also bemoan the loss of section rivalries, but given the choice, would you rather see EP and Edina at the X or at Richfield? Would you rather see #1 Tonka and #2 BSMat the X or at Parade? But, of course, since it makes too much sense, it will take a long time to happen, but it will.Lace'emUp wrote:I'm not involved with the HS football scene. How does their system work? (I could look it up, but I'd probably have more questions than answers)sinbin wrote:You learn from football.
It's fantastic to see small rinks full and intense OT games to go to state! Not particularly concerned with who goes to state, but how is your point relevant. A weak section has two weak teams in the Championship, an average section has two average teams and a great section has two great teams. Would the rinks be empty if they were all great teams in the final? No logic here, rinks would be full with fans either way. Good luck to all though, they all played their way in.Bulldog3489 wrote:Not 100% sure but were all AA section finals decided in the third period or overtime? I also understand that most (all?) were played in front of packed houses. Hard to top that.
I think if the school league dropped geography and just focused on getting the truly best teams from state you would see even more private school domination and more top player movement to a handful of programs.
By going to a neutral site, that is not determined until three days before the final, the section has set themselves up for scheduling issues. I don't know the story, but could it be that Bemidji was booked for Friday night? Rinks normally don't leave prime ice just hanging for a "what could be."lrugland wrote:I think you need to drive north more often.Orange_Wisent wrote:How soon Roseau fans forget, they played last year in the section final and buffalo drove close to 4 hours and Roseau drove a little over an hour played in bemidji.
Roseau to Brainerd 230 miles
Buffalo to Brainerd 98 miles
Roseau to Bemidji 135 miles
Buffalo to Bemidji 187 miles
You can not argue with math. And we do not forget the games we play. We have to drive for all of them.
Little better than flipping a coin.Bulldog3489 wrote:According to the current qrf rankings, 16 of the top 26 teams were in the AA section finals this year.
Interesting concept -- this would actually be a geographically larger section than going North/ South twice over -- and would you do the same for class A? I think a chance at having two north at the risk of none is always better, but maybe not.Otter wrote:Gerrymandering: a guy named Gerry created a voting district that looks like a salamander to favor his own political party. Sleazy, slimy, dishonest, lazy, corrupt, hypocrite politicians have been using this tactic for a couple hundred years--so how could the MSHSL resist?
I have to believe when they created the Girls AA Hockey Sections that the folks from up North signed off on it. Meaning there's always a possibility of having two teams in the State Tournament with the risk of having zero. At least a few times we've had Roseau in 8AA and GRG or CEC in 7AA. And we've always had at least one or the other. This is the first time I can remember that there have been zero. It was just a matter of time. Maybe it's time to combine GRG/Duluth/CEC with Bemidji/Moorhead/Roseau/Sartell/Brainerd to guarantee one Northern team. But then there will only be one with no possiblity of a second one (unless St Cloud really ramps up their program). Andover, NWC, Buffalo, Elk River and Forest Lake will be put together in a different section with St Cloud and River Lakes and a couple other north suburban teams.
Class A is very different because the percentage of schools is way larger in the 'outstate' group. Just spitballing, say the number of metro vs outstate in AA is 80-20% in favor of the metro teams, Class A might be 70-30% in favor of outstate. The A sections don't match up with the AA geographically.goaline wrote:
Interesting concept -- this would actually be a geographically larger section than going North/ South twice over -- and would you do the same for class A? I think a chance at having two north at the risk of none is always better, but maybe not.