Page 2 of 2
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 9:20 am
by Marty
What is scary for everyone else in Section 4AA is how young this Hill Murray girls team is.
Just like the HM boy's team the HM girls play a difficult non-conference schedule. Sure they "recruit" and enitce, but the coaches also prepare these teams so well.
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:25 am
by Sparlimb
Marty wrote:What is scary for everyone else in Section 4AA is how young this Hill Murray girls team is.
Just like the HM boy's team the HM girls play a difficult non-conference schedule. Sure they "recruit" and enitce, but the coaches also prepare these teams so well.
2 seniors on the team. Although one is the goalie who has been solid all year. But pretty much the entire team coming back. They don't seem to have any superstars, more of a grind it out team. Will be interesting to see how they do this week...
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 11:13 am
by hemiman
Replacing Woody will be tough, but the coaching staff did alright after #16 moved on. Heavy on 9th and tenth graders with some top jr.'s returning, the future looks good.
How happy is HM, that WBL passed on the goalie as a freshman?
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 6:49 pm
by sinbin
Interesting HM made it without HB this year, but not with HB last year. I understand that Roseville was stronger last year, but nice job by HM.
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 7:15 pm
by Sparlimb
sinbin wrote:Interesting HM made it without HB this year, but not with HB last year. I understand that Roseville was stronger last year, but nice job by HM.
Roseville was MUCH better last year (as was HM since they were #1). It is always interesting how that works, once you are no longer depending on one player to do most of the scoring. The entire team needs to contribute this year for HM to win. I think sometimes that helps teams...