The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://ushsho.com/forums/
BSM 11. HA 1mnhckyguy wrote:Don't get me wrong BSM is a well built team, they have many skilled players such as Besse and Naas. But your over looking the talent of AHA. If AHA shuts down BSM's first and second line, this could be a real surprising game. Where the real battle lies is back on defense, AHA has skilled defense men as well as a very skilled goalie. Many of you may be surprised tonight.
Apparently it was a surprise to the 7 who voted for AHA in the poll.WarmUpTheBus wrote: BSM 11. HA 1
Surprise, surprise!
I feel a lot of tension between you and Zblueblood wrote:That's because Z voted mutiple times
Sorry, "Z" did not vote. I do not vote, I always assume my team will win. That is what a real fan does!!!starmvp wrote:I feel a lot of tension between you and Zblueblood wrote:That's because Z voted mutiple times
its sad you have to come on here and chirp players that aren't what they are, especially when your the one playing JV or some parent with a stick up his/her a$$. If your a "minnscout" must be one of the worse scouts in the history of scouting. my dog scout could probably scout better then you. maybe you ment dirty as is sick dirty, the way they actually do play? i went to the EP game and they werent cheap at all, they dominated that game along with the goalie. maybe do some more "scouting" but this time do it right?minnscout wrote:HA is a joke, bunch of cheap shots. They look like s JV team out here. Maybe Benilde varsity should have stayed home and had the JV play HA varsity. With out HA goalie playing great it would be 14-15 to nothing. Haeg Bianchi and Mork are dirty players.
Well said Zam. Kids are kids and they make mistakes, they have good games and bad games. WE ARE ALL HUMAN, just like them. There is plenty of time for AHA to prove they are still a good program, and can play with the best.Zamman wrote:Sorry, "Z" did not vote. I do not vote, I always assume my team will win. That is what a real fan does!!!starmvp wrote:I feel a lot of tension between you and Zblueblood wrote:That's because Z voted mutiple times
As for calling the players cheap, let's get real. We are not on the ice, we are not in the scrums and hearing what they are saying to each other.
Facts of the game: BSM is highly skilled, they can shoot. Mains did not have the best of games, players will have one sometimes. AHA never gave up and played the entire time. Players do appear to get cheap, but it is both ways.
Ever really watched a game before?
A learning game for AHA, better than last year and that shows improvement. These are 14 - 17 year old KIDS, let them just play. We ADULTS need to let go a bit....
Minnscout,minnscout wrote:HolyMoly
Open up your eyes and take of the blindfold. Mork, Bianchi and Haeg are decent players but they played very dirty hockey last night.
Good idea.SWPrez wrote:Minnscout,minnscout wrote:HolyMoly
Open up your eyes and take of the blindfold. Mork, Bianchi and Haeg are decent players but they played very dirty hockey last night.
Smearing and saying negative things on here about specific players is inappropriate, especially from someone so close to the BSM program. Find someone who will listen to you at a bar post game (or some of those NAHL teams you scout for) and have these conversations. As I have stated to you before, kids read these boards too and don't deserve your comments. I saw some frustration last night as the game progressed as often happens in a blowout...I didn't see dirty hockey or head hunting from the players you mentioned. Keep it positive. BSM looked great and very deep. Move on to the next game.