HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

keepyourheadup wrote:Lakeville South 4
Prior Lake 3

South scores twice in the last 30 seconds

Ouch! What a tough way to lose.

In the 2nd Period:

Elk River 3
Andover 0

Any Burnsville score vs eastview

ER and Andover still 3-0 in the 3rd. There was a big fight in the 2nd with two players from each team ejected.

4-1 ER. Another player tossed from ER.

East Metro All Stars beat the West Metro All Stars 4 - 2

Moundsview adds a goal with 1 second left in the 2nd period to go up 8-4 of Forest Lake. FL's backup goalie went in at the start of the 2nd.

Elk River beats Andover 4-1.

6 EP
5 AHA



Yes, a loss, but looks like the Stars are back.

Eagan 8
Rosemount 0

shots 49 to 12

Moundsview 11
Forest Lake 6

HShockeywatcher wrote:6 EP
5 AHA



Yes, a loss, but looks like the Stars are back.

Saw that ep scored with 3.7 seconds left in the game to get the win. Also mayo tops jm 2 to 0

Was the Andover/Elk River game a section or conference game?

MNhockey29 wrote:Was the Andover/Elk River game a section or conference game?

It was a section and conference game I'm fairly certain, though conferences are completely irrelevant. I wish the MSHSL would follow Dave Esse's recommendation and delete all conferences and base schedules strictly on section assignment with 2 game vs. every team in a section.

TheHockeyDJ wrote:

MNhockey29 wrote:Was the Andover/Elk River game a section or conference game?

It was a section and conference game I'm fairly certain, though conferences are completely irrelevant. I wish the MSHSL would follow Dave Esse's recommendation and delete all conferences and base schedules strictly on section assignment with 2 game vs. every team in a section.

Cannot and won't happen, there are many sports to work with than just hockey.

Zamman wrote:

TheHockeyDJ wrote:

MNhockey29 wrote:Was the Andover/Elk River game a section or conference game?

It was a section and conference game I'm fairly certain, though conferences are completely irrelevant. I wish the MSHSL would follow Dave Esse's recommendation and delete all conferences and base schedules strictly on section assignment with 2 game vs. every team in a section.

Cannot and won't happen, there are many sports to work with than just hockey.

I agree it won't happen, but how do you mean to cannot happen? Obviously they couldn't have two match ups in football, but they could play one.

I also don't think it would be a great idea because then some teams in some regions would get great match ups all season and others would be terrible. It could work if we divided up into 8 sections, each into two subsections. Top 4 in each subsection make the playoffs...or something similar.

Zamman wrote:

TheHockeyDJ wrote:

MNhockey29 wrote:Was the Andover/Elk River game a section or conference game?

It was a section and conference game I'm fairly certain, though conferences are completely irrelevant. I wish the MSHSL would follow Dave Esse's recommendation and delete all conferences and base schedules strictly on section assignment with 2 game vs. every team in a section.

Cannot and won't happen, there are many sports to work with than just hockey.

Why can't they eliminate conferences in just hockey? They make absolutely no sense. I think that you could have some agreements in scheduling, but to keep standings for a conference even now is just a bunch of nonsense. Winning a conference is the equivalent of getting a yellow participation ribbon on track and field day in elementary school.

What a comedy - the topic is captioned "Scores and Updates" !