Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:28 pm





](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif)
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif)
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif)
WOW Pioneer press, that is ridiculous, if you're gonna go with a pioneer (which we knew you all would) Go with Ben Bahe, he is a much better choice than Shaughnessy.
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://ushsho.com/forums/
Agreed. That would have at least been a defensible choice.wbhockey02 wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
WOW Pioneer press, that is ridiculous, if you're gonna go with a pioneer (which we knew you all would) Go with Ben Bahe, he is a much better choice than Shaughnessy.
Tim isn't my first choice either, but they did include his academics which are stellar.The Gumper wrote:Agreed. That would have at least been a defensible choice.wbhockey02 wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
WOW Pioneer press, that is ridiculous, if you're gonna go with a pioneer (which we knew you all would) Go with Ben Bahe, he is a much better choice than Shaughnessy.
youngblood08 wrote:SO stpaul in a cense your statement basically says that if you don't go to Hill and play hockey you have no chance of scoring higher then a 29 on your ACT score?
A teammate of my son scored a 35 and he went to a public school. Was offered a full ride to Purdue. How was that possible at a public school?
You see Hill's test scores will be higher as kids have to APPLY to get in, public score has to accept all weather they plan on attending college or not.
Pull your head out of the sand.
Just to be clear, Shaughnessy is a excellent goalie and had a great year and career at Hill. The fact that the Pioneer Press picked him as player of the year is not his fault. Some of the comments here almost imply that he had some sort of control over his selection. He just played the game and did the best he could...the Pioneer Press made the decision to select him player of the year. Congrats to him and all the players who were recognized!!The Gumper wrote:It's rather remarkable that a player who didn't make the list of Mr. Hockey finalists and didn't even make any of Star Tribune's all-metro teams was chosen by the Pioneer Press as the best player in the entire state.
Then again, it makes sense considering the Pioneer Press's excessive and fawning coverage of Hill-Murray hockey.
Such as?seek & destroy wrote:Some of the comments here almost imply that he had some sort of control over his selection.
Do the selection criteria include ACT score or academics? If not, isn't the ACT score irrelevant to the selection?PuckU126 wrote: Tim isn't my first choice either, but they did include his academics which are stellar.
And Timmy here isn't up for the Brimsek award.UntouchableFlow wrote:Well, The Gumper, if you had any knowledge of High School hockey you would know that goalies are up for the Brimsek award, and skaters are up for Mr. Hockey
Academics.The Gumper wrote:Do the selection criteria include ACT score or academics? If not, isn't the ACT score irrelevant to the selection?PuckU126 wrote: Tim isn't my first choice either, but they did include his academics which are stellar.
It was published earlier this year that Kyle Rau has a 4.0. Now it's very possible that he doesn't exactly take the hardest classes on earth but all A's with his hockey schedule is very impressive regardless. This was a year where it is pretty clear who the best overall player in the state was and it's becoming very clear that the PP goes for the "controversial" angle and would never pick the same kid as the Strib. It's not like it really matters though, the Strib's reputation is so much better than the PP that this pick is almost irrelevant.PuckU126 wrote:Academics.The Gumper wrote:Do the selection criteria include ACT score or academics? If not, isn't the ACT score irrelevant to the selection?PuckU126 wrote: Tim isn't my first choice either, but they did include his academics which are stellar.
Which Tim has a 3.8 GPA, and that is excellent especially at HM.
I believe ACT scores are irrelevant to the selection process.
Everyone gets a trophy these days...EHSHack wrote:I wasnt aware 15,000 kids got honorable mentions.
Or a strategy to sell more newspapers...Weekend_Warrior wrote:Somehow this seems like a sympathy award.
ding ding ding ding ding dingMNHockeyFan wrote:Or a strategy to sell more newspapers...Weekend_Warrior wrote:Somehow this seems like a sympathy award.
Actually, I don't think that's true. I couldn't find any selection criteria anywhere in the PiPress, but in most stories about the winner there's no mention of GPA or academics at all. This includes R.J. Anderson (2005), David Fischer (2006), Ben Hanowski (2009), and Nick Bjugstad (2010).PuckU126 wrote: Academics.
Which Tim has a 3.8 GPA, and that is excellent especially at HM.
I believe ACT scores are irrelevant to the selection process.
I stand corrected. I think it's Bitzer of Moorhead.HockeyMN1 wrote:And Timmy here isn't up for the Brimsek award.UntouchableFlow wrote:Well, The Gumper, if you had any knowledge of High School hockey you would know that goalies are up for the Brimsek award, and skaters are up for Mr. Hockey
Turning over a new leaf perhaps?The Gumper wrote:Actually, I don't think that's true. I couldn't find any selection criteria anywhere in the PiPress, but in most stories about the winner there's no mention of GPA or academics at all. This includes R.J. Anderson (2005), David Fischer (2006), Ben Hanowski (2009), and Nick Bjugstad (2010).PuckU126 wrote: Academics.
Which Tim has a 3.8 GPA, and that is excellent especially at HM.
I believe ACT scores are irrelevant to the selection process.
It certainly looks to me like it's a hockey award only, which makes Shaughnessy's selection quite puzzling. He's not on the PiPress's all state team in addition to being left off of the Strib's three all-metro teams and the slate of Mr. Hockey finalists.