Page 2 of 2
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2011 7:16 pm
by greybeard58
Tripped since I currently have a difficult schedule and have a tendency to have the days run together and since I am currently working out of state for a bit. I should have used the word did in place of will attend. The idea of being civil is a way to get a point across.
I am wondering just how many people did attend.
If people didn't go then there is always the Mn Hockey April meeting. Because of the checking issue I will be making the time to attend that meeting to put forth my opinion. I will also be sending a letter to both Mn Hockey and USA Hockey with my stated concerns and I hope there are a lot of people that will also do the same.
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2011 7:39 pm
by hockey_is_a_choice
I briefly attended the meeting. Just before noon, there were thirty people sitting in the audience (I counted). Although I would have liked to stay for the question and answer part of that meeting, the Class A championship game started at noon and the question and answer part of the Town meeting was not scheduled to start until 12:45 pm. Hmmm . . .
Mr. Elliott, perhaps there would be greater participation if Minnesota Hockey hosted a virtual meeting using the Web.
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 5:38 am
by elliott70
I have been out of town and not reading the forum.
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 7:38 am
by the_juiceman
trippedovertheblueline wrote:greybeard58 wrote:A reminder for all who will attend. It might be a good idea to be as civil, I would hope Mn Hockey hosts more of the town hall style meeting open to all. I also hope the questions get answered.
Wasn't this meeting on Saturday the 12th? Typical D10 leadership
what does D10 have to do with it?
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 8:39 am
by MrBoDangles
Ugottobekiddingme wrote:Try pg. 3 locked "Advance 15 program" and just below "Bantam A Lets play hockey rankings 12-16-10" ....great reading..right out of the handbook.
9 for Duluth East in the Reebok 16's.... 3 for Andover...... 0 for Elk River
You might want to face the facts (stop crying) about your kid not making the 15's last year. The best players made it through again.
Get your tissue box out.
woof woof
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 10:13 pm
by Ugottobekiddingme
MrBoDangles wrote:Ugottobekiddingme wrote:Try pg. 3 locked "Advance 15 program" and just below "Bantam A Lets play hockey rankings 12-16-10" ....great reading..right out of the handbook.
9 for Duluth East in the Reebok 16's.... 3 for Andover...... 0 for Elk River
You might want to face the facts (stop crying) about your kid not making the 15's last year. The best players made it through again.
Get your tissue box out.
woof woof
Sorry, I was busy helping with the "sandbagging" operation...In Fargo. Speaking of sandbagging, I also attended the town hall meeting on the 13th with Greybeard and ended up helping the wild girls sharpen their shovels. Was anything produced at this meeting towards MN hockey??
Without any children to speak of, which split personality should I respond to? Larry, Curly, or Bo....?
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:33 am
by MrBoDangles
Ugottobekiddingme wrote:MrBoDangles wrote:Ugottobekiddingme wrote:Try pg. 3 locked "Advance 15 program" and just below "Bantam A Lets play hockey rankings 12-16-10" ....great reading..right out of the handbook.
9 for Duluth East in the Reebok 16's.... 3 for Andover...... 0 for Elk River
You might want to face the facts (stop crying) about your kid not making the 15's last year. The best players made it through again.
Get your tissue box out.
woof woof
Sorry, I was busy helping with the "sandbagging" operation...In Fargo. Speaking of sandbagging, I also attended the town hall meeting on the 13th with Greybeard and ended up helping the wild girls sharpen their shovels. Was anything produced at this meeting towards MN hockey??
Without any children to speak of, which split personality should I respond to? Larry, Curly, or Bo....?
No and Moe