Page 2 of 2
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 5:37 pm
by JGAstud08
If tonka had that many power plays it woulda been a blow out
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 2:04 am
by Slap Shot
hockeyguy09 wrote:I say the Cadets take this one in easy fashion winning 5-1
Solid call.
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 11:35 am
by keepyourheadup
I think roster depth will have a lot to do with the success at STA this year, their top end players are very good but what has changed is they don't appear to have the same level of underclassmen as past years. Hard to replace guys like Schroeder, Isaackson, Crandall, Walters and the like each year. They had a hell of a run but I don't see them plucking the top kids out of associations like they have in the past. This team has had freshman and sophomores make huge contributions over the last 6 or 7 years. Minnetonka on the other hand has a large association and can almost reload on a yearly basis. For the first time in years I'm not sure STA belongs in the conversation with the top schools regardless of class.
keepyourhead up comment
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 2:06 pm
by puckster15
Not sure I agree with keepyourhead up comment. It was a great hockey game, could have gone either way.
JV game between STA and Tonka was 3-1 which was also a really good game.
It is not like Tonka ran over either of STA's teams.
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 8:52 pm
by genosniper
Minnetonka- looked solid, #22 looked like the top guy on tuesday, they might suprise some people at the end of the year
STA- looked like the better team in the third period as they outshot tonka like 13-4. The only thing is they have no depth