Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:23 pm
ELK RIVER OVER ANDOVER, F.L. over CDH LOOKS LIKE IT MIGHT BE A PRETTY GOOD SECTION.
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://ushsho.com/forums/
No way Cloquet should have got the 6 seed last year and they shouldn't this year. The difference with this season, though, is that they beat Forest Lake late in the season last year. A strong section win late in the season helped, so if they do not beat East they should be in the play-in game.karl(east) wrote:1. Elk River
2. Duluth East
3. Andover
4. Forest Lake
5. Grand Rapids
6. Cloquet
7. St. Francis
8. Cambridge
9. Princeton
There are two remaining section games--Cambridge v. Princeton and DE v. Cloquet. So the bottom two could switch, and if Cloquet were to pull off the upset, East would drop a spot. Otherwise, I see little movement over the next 2 and a half weeks.
Going strictly by records one might argue that Cloquet should be lower, but Cloquet got the 6-seed last year and were worse than they are this year.
I agree completely. But this is what I think it will be, not what it should be. Cloquet should be the 8 seed if they don't beat East.steelheader wrote:No way Cloquet should have got the 6 seed last year and they shouldn't this year. The difference with this season, though, is that they beat Forest Lake late in the season last year. A strong section win late in the season helped, so if they do not beat East they should be in the play-in game.karl(east) wrote:1. Elk River
2. Duluth East
3. Andover
4. Forest Lake
5. Grand Rapids
6. Cloquet
7. St. Francis
8. Cambridge
9. Princeton
There are two remaining section games--Cambridge v. Princeton and DE v. Cloquet. So the bottom two could switch, and if Cloquet were to pull off the upset, East would drop a spot. Otherwise, I see little movement over the next 2 and a half weeks.
Going strictly by records one might argue that Cloquet should be lower, but Cloquet got the 6-seed last year and were worse than they are this year.
That's a double edged sword there. I love watching and LISTENING to Tony walk in front of the kids screaming all game long, but I hate watching their style of play on the ice.slyer wrote:you never know in a one and done tourny, any team could pull an upset but i don't see that happening to the elks. they are 10-2-3 in their last 15 games and their goalie franke has 3 shutouts in his last 5 games, one against centennial and one against maple grove. i think that it will be the elks against east again this year with the elks heading to st.paul.
You don't like watching teams win? You a Sleepy Eye fan?BodyShots wrote:That's a double edged sword there. I love watching and LISTENING to Tony walk in front of the kids screaming all game long, but I hate watching their style of play on the ice.
BigWorm wrote:1. Elk River
2. Duluth East
3. Andover
4. Flake
5. Rapids
6. St. Francis
7. Cambridge
8. Cloquet
9. Princeton
Cloquet could always get a higher seed like last year, but I doubt it winless in the section. If they could have beat Flake tonight things would be different but they got blown out, 8-0.
No, would rather see East, Rapids or Cloquet representing 7AA this year.I gotta have a little reality in Section 8....Rams or Spuds will represent the north.
steelheader wrote:BigWorm wrote:1. Elk River
2. Duluth East
3. Andover
4. Flake
5. Rapids
6. St. Francis
7. Cambridge
8. Cloquet
9. Princeton
Cloquet could always get a higher seed like last year, but I doubt it winless in the section. If they could have beat Flake tonight things would be different but they got blown out, 8-0.
This looks right, but who knows? I wonder how much weight goes into how the teams finished the season. Cloquet will have a tough time arguing better than 8 but it wouldn't shock me to see them at 7.
Logistically it makes more sense to have Cambridge & Princeton in the play-in game but that shouldn't factor in. Not sure East wants to play Cloquet in the 7-2 matchup.
I think there will be one upset in the quarterfinals btw.
No, Sleepy Eye is what I get when I watch the Elks play.EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:You don't like watching teams win? You a Sleepy Eye fan?BodyShots wrote:That's a double edged sword there. I love watching and LISTENING to Tony walk in front of the kids screaming all game long, but I hate watching their style of play on the ice.
BodyShots wrote:No, Sleepy Eye is what I get when I watch the Elks play.EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:You don't like watching teams win? You a Sleepy Eye fan?BodyShots wrote:That's a double edged sword there. I love watching and LISTENING to Tony walk in front of the kids screaming all game long, but I hate watching their style of play on the ice.
Yes it is.BigWorm wrote:Is the seeding meeting tonight?
BodyShots wrote:No, Sleepy Eye is what I get when I watch the Elks play.EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:You don't like watching teams win? You a Sleepy Eye fan?BodyShots wrote:That's a double edged sword there. I love watching and LISTENING to Tony walk in front of the kids screaming all game long, but I hate watching their style of play on the ice.