Page 2 of 2

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:49 pm
by Lucia4President
sinbin006 wrote:Two Harbors - 0
Hermantown - 8

Final

Shots: 71-5 Hermantown

http://www.mnhockeyhub.com/game/game_sheet/403753
Sounds like a good, competitive hockey game.

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:52 pm
by PowerForward25
Lucia4President wrote:
sinbin006 wrote:Two Harbors - 0
Hermantown - 8

Final

Shots: 71-5 Hermantown

http://www.mnhockeyhub.com/game/game_sheet/403753
Sounds like a good, competitive hockey game.
:lol:

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:56 pm
by hockeygirl34
Anybody know the score of the I Falls-Eveleth/Gilbert game?

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:59 pm
by qbtobe7
eastside hockey wrote:Maybe if some of the senoirs were benched for a few games and the younger JV players given a chance to steal away there roster spot, the motivation would come back.
You and I both know that calling up some people from a bad junior varsity team isn't going to help solve any problems for Woodbury.

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:00 pm
by sinbin006
Ashland (WI) - 0
Marshall School of Duluth - 12

Final

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:03 pm
by PowerForward25
qbtobe7 wrote:
eastside hockey wrote:Maybe if some of the senoirs were benched for a few games and the younger JV players given a chance to steal away there roster spot, the motivation would come back.
You and I both know that calling up some people from a bad junior varsity team isn't going to help solve any problems for Woodbury.
Bolin has to start working his magic. There is an obvious schism within that team that needs to be fixed.

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:05 pm
by Hit the net kid
At the BSM HILL game it's a good one 2-2 6:22 left in the third. Not Saying just Saying.

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:11 pm
by qbtobe7
PowerForward25 wrote:
qbtobe7 wrote:
eastside hockey wrote:Maybe if some of the senoirs were benched for a few games and the younger JV players given a chance to steal away there roster spot, the motivation would come back.
You and I both know that calling up some people from a bad junior varsity team isn't going to help solve any problems for Woodbury.
Bolin has to start working his magic. But there is an obvious schism within that team that needs to be fixed.
I don't necessarily think there is a schism (most of these guys are good friends), I just think that this is a classic case of a team being overconfident and thinking all they have to do to win is show up. You would've thought the Minnetonka game would have opened their eyes, but apparently not. Let's sure hope they'll be able to turn things around Thursday against Park.

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:16 pm
by EMTEEW
hockeygirl34 wrote:Anybody know the score of the I Falls-Eveleth/Gilbert game?
Falls 16-0 Final

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:17 pm
by sinbin006
Proctor - 2
Cloquet - 10

Final

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:26 pm
by eastside hockey
qbtobe7 wrote:
PowerForward25 wrote:
qbtobe7 wrote:You and I both know that calling up some people from a bad junior varsity team isn't going to help solve any problems for Woodbury.
Bolin has to start working his magic. But there is an obvious schism within that team that needs to be fixed.
I don't necessarily think there is a schism (most of these guys are good friends), I just think that this is a classic case of a team being overconfident and thinking all they have to do to win is show up. You would've thought the Minnetonka game would have opened their eyes, but apparently not. Let's sure hope they'll be able to turn things around Thursday against Park.
That could be a large part of it. the team has shown short glimpses of the team play they are capable of. I dont think a victory over Park will go very far to show a vast improvement. The closest game that will measure this will come in the Holiday tourney. if they want to prove they belong in the rankings, they will have to make a statement there.

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:56 pm
by hockeyman84
Armstrong-3
St. Louis Park-2

SLP goals from Petit and Smith. Brodersen with 2 assists both SLP goals came late in the third after going down 3-0.

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 11:46 pm
by brandy38
eastside hockey wrote:
qbtobe7 wrote:
PowerForward25 wrote: Bolin has to start working his magic. But there is an obvious schism within that team that needs to be fixed.
I don't necessarily think there is a schism (most of these guys are good friends), I just think that this is a classic case of a team being overconfident and thinking all they have to do to win is show up. You would've thought the Minnetonka game would have opened their eyes, but apparently not. Let's sure hope they'll be able to turn things around Thursday against Park.
That could be a large part of it. the team has shown short glimpses of the team play they are capable of. I dont think a victory over Park will go very far to show a vast improvement. The closest game that will measure this will come in the Holiday tourney. if they want to prove they belong in the rankings, they will have to make a statement there.
Disappointment: That's the word that came to mind when I saw the score. I didn't think that Woodbury would win, but a 4-1 loss coupled with a lazy effort (as one previous poster wrote) really stings. I think that Woodbury was supposed to carry the banner this year for the East Metro public schools. All the rest of them are down for the time being, maybe except for Centennial. Even so, I think that this team has more talent than the team that won Consolation at state two seasons ago. Looks like little respect will be shown to east metro teams this year unless the Royals can pick it up in the SLP tournament later this month, but that looks like a much taller order after tonight's loss.

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 4:31 am
by Slap Shot
hockeyman84 wrote:Armstrong-3
St. Louis Park-2

SLP goals from Petit and Smith. Brodersen with 2 assists both SLP goals came late in the third after going down 3-0.
Wow, Armstrong has really fallen.

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 8:44 am
by MNHockeyFan
Slap Shot wrote:
hockeyman84 wrote:Armstrong-3
St. Louis Park-2

SLP goals from Petit and Smith. Brodersen with 2 assists both SLP goals came late in the third after going down 3-0.
Wow, Armstrong has really fallen.
They've lost a number of their best players to private schools over the past 5 years. Some of the better ones include Kent Patterson (to Blake and now with the Gophers), Pat Borer (to BSM, now with Sioux City and going to Nebraska-Omaha), Mike Morin (Breck senior) and Christian Horn (BSM junior). With lower numbers in their youth program, these departures hurt their high school a lot more than schools like Wayzata and Minnetonka, which have a lot more depth.

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 8:54 am
by puck81
MNHockeyFan wrote:
Slap Shot wrote:
hockeyman84 wrote:Armstrong-3
St. Louis Park-2

SLP goals from Petit and Smith. Brodersen with 2 assists both SLP goals came late in the third after going down 3-0.
Wow, Armstrong has really fallen.
They've lost a number of their best players to private schools over the past 5 years. Some of the better ones include Kent Patterson (to Blake and now with the Gophers), Pat Borer (to BSM, now with Sioux City and going to Nebraska-Omaha), Mike Morin (Breck senior) and Christian Horn (BSM junior). With lower numbers in their youth program, these departures hurt their high school a lot more than schools like Wayzata and Minnetonka, which have a lot more depth.
Armstrong High School never had "their best players" because they never belonged to Armstrong High School in the first place. Just because a player lives in that 'government school district" does NOT mean they belong to that "government school district". As of now it is still a free country. Government run school's DO NOT own the rights to any player. Period.

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 9:56 am
by MNHockeyFan
puck81 wrote:
MNHockeyFan wrote:They've lost a number of their best players to private schools over the past 5 years. Some of the better ones include Kent Patterson (to Blake and now with the Gophers), Pat Borer (to BSM, now with Sioux City and going to Nebraska-Omaha), Mike Morin (Breck senior) and Christian Horn (BSM junior). With lower numbers in their youth program, these departures hurt their high school a lot more than schools like Wayzata and Minnetonka, which have a lot more depth.
Armstrong High School never had "their best players" because they never belonged to Armstrong High School in the first place. Just because a player lives in that 'government school district" does NOT mean they belong to that "government school district". As of now it is still a free country. Government run school's DO NOT own the rights to any player. Period.
I did not mean to imply that these players "belonged" to anybody. Believe me, I'm as big of a supporter of school choice as anyone. 'Nuff said.

Woodbury

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 10:45 am
by goalie30
Woodbury is a talented team but I believe it also has a lot of players that played on the same Bantam A team a few years ago. I think they lost only 1 or 2 games in the District 8 regular season and then finished a disappointing 4th in the district playoff and did not make regions. That team was supposed to contend for the Bantam State Championship but fell far short. Seems like they could not win when it counted.

That was a long time ago and now they are more mature (hopefully) and have a much better coach. But it looks like this particular group of players still has issues with the big games.

Missing scores

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 4:00 pm
by east hockey
Still missing the following:

Becker/Big Lake at Webster (Wi)
Chaska at Cambridge
Ely at Fort Frances (Ont)
Redwood Valley at Waconia

If anyone has scores or cancellation notices for these, it'd be appreciated. Thanks!

Lee

[edit: Found out all four games were postponed or cancelled]

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 7:00 pm
by Black Ice
Chaska @ Cambridge PPD
Redwood Valley @ Waconia PPD

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 7:33 pm
by newmexicohockey
eastside hockey wrote:Edina 4

Woodbury 1

FINAL

Very close game up until the Mid 3rd when 16 lazy Seniors showed up for Woodbury again. Alot of individual talent going to waste on this team. Karl was right in saying that they have to show they can win in the big games. Hopefully Wes Bolin can figure out how to motivate them to play the way they are capable of. If not, it will be a short sectional playoff for them. Maybe if some of the senoirs were benched for a few games and the younger JV players given a chance to steal away there roster spot, the motivation would come back. Edina was not impressive at all. The goal tender is awful. a High % of all the shots he stopped resulted in Dangerous rebounds. A team who follows there shots and crashes the net hard should far outscore Edina. poor performances IMO by two overrated teams. :|
16 seniors on the team?! whats up with that?

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 10:04 pm
by Good Will Hunting
Blake 3
Totino Grace 1

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 12:34 pm
by newmexicohockey
PowerForward25 wrote:
qbtobe7 wrote:
eastside hockey wrote:Maybe if some of the senoirs were benched for a few games and the younger JV players given a chance to steal away there roster spot, the motivation would come back.
You and I both know that calling up some people from a bad junior varsity team isn't going to help solve any problems for Woodbury.
Bolin has to start working his magic. There is an obvious schism within that team that needs to be fixed.
With a team plump full of seniors this year, and a "bad junior varsity team" this year, Bolin will need more than his "magic" for next year!