Page 2 of 2
north
Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 7:46 pm
by watchdog
i wouldnt worrie to much moorhead will have a power house starting next year and roseau is right behind them..
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 11:52 pm
by grindiangrad-80
I wouldn't write off the northern teams just yet.
They will have a couple of teams to be reckoned with in March.
They always do.
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:31 am
by Indians forever
Come March North, East, West, South there will always be a surprise...
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 1:14 am
by King of the Pond
pucker52 wrote:I agree with Blake. I also don't think Centennial is where most people thought they would be and they have been close to a one-man show so far. While I thought Stillwater wouldn't be very good, the game I saw would suggest they be heading toward new lows.
Your kidding right? Where exactly should they be if #4 in the state isnt where they should be. I wouldnt consider 1 bad game against White Bear and then not even getting close to being beat by any other team a disappointment.
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 1:21 am
by Indians forever
I guess with all of the pre-season hype Hill would have to be the biggest disapointment! Roseau coming in a close 2nd.
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:08 am
by youngblood08
pucker52 wrote:I agree with Blake. I also don't think Centennial is where most people thought they would be and they have been close to a one-man show so far. While I thought Stillwater wouldn't be very good, the game I saw would suggest they be heading toward new lows.
Spot on. Centennial and Stillwater are both doing so bad, you should start predicting the weather.
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:56 am
by MNHockeyFan
Indians forever wrote:I guess with all of the pre-season hype Hill would have to be the biggest disapointment!
From here on out, the expectations will now be lowered substantially so it will become harder to be 'disappointed'.
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:20 pm
by sachishi4
considering the players HM lost from last year and their win over Edina earlier this year I find it hard for them to be a dissapointment. Tonka, Centennial, and STA are good teams too.
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:13 pm
by clapper17
Indians forever wrote:I guess with all of the pre-season hype Hill would have to be the biggest disapointment! Roseau coming in a close 2nd.
Roseau has the capability still of being a very successful hockey team this year, but they have not shown it. Big disapointment
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:15 am
by justhavefun
Maybe edina. thought they would still blow thourhg the season. There injury was a bigger loss then I thought he would be.
true, but
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:30 pm
by rightwinger
Pioneerprideguy wrote:I'm gonna go with Nothern hockey in general. Spuds & Rams have taken major steps backwards and there doesn't seem to be a legitimate power outside of the cities right now. East could be mentioned but they appear to solid, not a power. Still time for teams to hit their stride before March but so far nothern hockey hasn't been impressive.
Agreed, Roseau looks very weak, a one-line team.
If Hill or Blake or BSM is considered a disappointment mid-season, can they still add kids via open enrollment? Just asking.......
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 9:05 pm
by RamWarrior
ROSEAU #1 Disappointment I knew they would'nt be last years rams but I didn't see 6 - 5 - 2 after 13 games, got Warroad on Thur 1/15 in Warroad, should see how good they are in that one both teams always show up for that game. Don't be shocked when Roseau UPSETS Moorhead AGAIN in the section final.