Page 2 of 4
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 10:19 pm
by 5 Hole
Syd Barrett wrote:
By the way how'd your fantasy team do yesterday
Syd
Tell ya what Sydney, you're a real comedian
. . . I'm getting over it now
Back to hockey. . .
First line will get their 2-4 goals, but it will be key for lines 2 and 3 to stay even strength, or the Warriors will have a struggle at their hands
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:07 am
by great hockey mind
from what i have seen the 3rd line plays very little and I do not think that will change.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:00 am
by lampthelight
Indian Head wrote:Maybe the 2 and 3 lines should be put back the way they were in Alex?
The 2nd line in Alex got dominated(-2, with little offensive chances). The 3rd line was a lot better that day(+2, several good chances). They needed to be switched up a little.
I think they are on the right track with the line changes, However, I'd like to see another slight change in them to generate a little more offense. Hopefully they can get them clicking, if they do it could be a dangerous team come playoff time.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 12:21 pm
by Indian Head
lampthelight wrote:Indian Head wrote:Maybe the 2 and 3 lines should be put back the way they were in Alex?
The 2nd line in Alex got dominated(-2, with little offensive chances). The 3rd line was a lot better that day(+2, several good chances). They needed to be switched up a little.
I think they are on the right track with the line changes, However, I'd like to see another slight change in them to generate a little more offense. Hopefully they can get them clicking, if they do it could be a dangerous team come playoff time.
What change would that be?
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 1:11 pm
by 5 Hole
Indian Head wrote:lampthelight wrote:Indian Head wrote:Maybe the 2 and 3 lines should be put back the way they were in Alex?
The 2nd line in Alex got dominated(-2, with little offensive chances). The 3rd line was a lot better that day(+2, several good chances). They needed to be switched up a little.
I think they are on the right track with the line changes, However, I'd like to see another slight change in them to generate a little more offense. Hopefully they can get them clicking, if they do it could be a dangerous team come playoff time.
What change would that be?
. . .Probably something involving his son
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:18 pm
by Syd Barrett
5 Hole wrote:. . .Probably something involving his son
That narrows it down to 3 and I'll bet it ain't the guy from Pequot
Syd
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 6:20 pm
by lampthelight
Syd Barrett wrote:5 Hole wrote:. . .Probably something involving his son
That narrows it down to 3 and I'll bet it ain't the guy from Pequot
Syd
You guys are clueless.
Yes, I think changes could be made to the lines to make them better, but i could be wrong. These may be the best 2nd and 3rd lines Brainerd can put together. I just have a tough time believing that when they have rarely scored in the first 3 games. It might just be the players that they have to choose from. Not a lot of talent with the puck on these lines, tough to get production out of both of them. Lucky to get it out of one. I'd put the top 3 guys with the puck together on 2nd line, and have the other 3 become a defensive specialist line.
Any other questions from the Brainerd "Brain Trust"?
post 8797
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:00 pm
by boblee
I will attempt to do my best posting updates tonight. Also check grhshockey.com for more info.
post 8813
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:55 pm
by boblee
Grand Rapis goes up 1-0.
Rendle from Roy on the PP.
post 8814
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:02 pm
by boblee
Brainerd ties it at one. Swanson from Engel and Monda
post 8816
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:10 pm
by boblee
Olson from Frazer and it is 2-1 Brainerd.
post 8819
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:15 pm
by boblee
Brainerd 2
Grand Rapids 1
End of 1st
Shots:
Brainerd 13
Grand Rapids 9
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:21 pm
by PASTRAPIDSFAN
whos in net bobleee
post 8822
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:23 pm
by boblee
PASTRAPIDSFAN wrote:whos in net bobleee
Underwood-GR
Mimmack-BR
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:25 pm
by PASTRAPIDSFAN
sounds good
post 8825
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:29 pm
by boblee
Grand Rapids 3
Brainerd 2
Rapids goes:
1:04 Palkki from Moore and Kleinendorst
2:25 Greniger from Bishop
Brainerd
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:32 pm
by Thehockeyplaya
Anyone here know how much Tate Rusk is playing this year? What line and such?
Re: Brainerd
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:38 pm
by 5 Hole
Thehockeyplaya wrote:Anyone here know how much Tate Rusk is playing this year? What line and such?
I hear he's the fifth defensemen, behind Olson, Swanson, Ring, Korte
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:52 pm
by PASTRAPIDSFAN
Rapids 4-2 roy
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:54 pm
by grindiangrad-80
That must have been real late in the period.
post 8827
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:56 pm
by boblee
yes, it came with 8 seconds left.
Roy from Skrbec and Rendle
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:57 pm
by PASTRAPIDSFAN
like 25 seconds left, they had penaltys at 34 seconds
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:57 pm
by grindiangrad-80
Thats a big one on the road.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:58 pm
by PASTRAPIDSFAN
I was off a few seconds
post 8828
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:59 pm
by boblee
Grand Rapids 4
Brainerd 2
End of 2nd
Shots:
Grand Rapids 21
Brainerd 17