Page 2 of 3
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:38 pm
by stickboy1956
Gopher Blog wrote:I listed out the MN kids and WCHA recruits on my blog. If you don't wish to file through the whole list that is. If I missed a few names, sorry.... I was trying to get it done fast so I could move on to other things.

Gleason is a UND recruit.
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:50 pm
by Gopher Blog
stickboy1956 wrote:Gopher Blog wrote:I listed out the MN kids and WCHA recruits on my blog. If you don't wish to file through the whole list that is. If I missed a few names, sorry.... I was trying to get it done fast so I could move on to other things.

Gleason is a UND recruit.
Thanks. I actually had it there but deleted it by accident when I decided to remove the year they'd be hitting college (since some recruits are still up in the air on that).
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 3:10 pm
by breakout
Gopher Blog wrote:stickboy1956 wrote:Gopher Blog wrote:I listed out the MN kids and WCHA recruits on my blog. If you don't wish to file through the whole list that is. If I missed a few names, sorry.... I was trying to get it done fast so I could move on to other things.

Gleason is a UND recruit.
Thanks. I actually had it there but deleted it by accident when I decided to remove the year they'd be hitting college (since some recruits are still up in the air on that).
GB, thanks for the info on your blog. I am guessing that many of those players, even on the "A" list are not complete players. However, the NHL sees possible upside potential.
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 3:16 pm
by Hockey=Life
I see the local list from you gopher, but does anyone know the website for the whole list? If so, thanks.
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 3:29 pm
by sjubum
Hockey=Life wrote:I see the local list from you gopher, but does anyone know the website for the whole list? If so, thanks.
Direct link:
http://centralscouting.nhl.com/CSMenu.n ... enDocument
Get the PDF.
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 3:55 pm
by hockeyeast223
can anyone explain what the column with the * indicates? I notice many of the high school players have them.
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 4:11 pm
by Observer85
hockeyeast223 wrote:can anyone explain what the column with the * indicates? I notice many of the high school players have them.
If a player has a (*) by his name it means that his height and weight were actually taken by a representative from CSS. Otherwise the figures are from what the player has put on a form or what his team has used in the past.
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 10:44 pm
by stickboy1956
breakout wrote:Gopher Blog wrote:stickboy1956 wrote:
Gleason is a UND recruit.
Thanks. I actually had it there but deleted it by accident when I decided to remove the year they'd be hitting college (since some recruits are still up in the air on that).
GB, thanks for the info on your blog. I am guessing that many of those players, even on the "A" list are not complete players. However, the NHL sees possible upside potential.
Which A player do you think is overrated?
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 12:50 am
by breakout
stickboy1956 wrote:breakout wrote:Gopher Blog wrote:
Thanks. I actually had it there but deleted it by accident when I decided to remove the year they'd be hitting college (since some recruits are still up in the air on that).
GB, thanks for the info on your blog. I am guessing that some of those players, even on the "A" list may be less than complete players. However, the NHL sees possible upside potential.
Which A player do you think is overrated?
Just speculating that some of the players listed as A, B and C may be less than complete players. The NHL must see some upside (potential).
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:44 am
by Offside
being on the list is more about their potential, how the NHL CSS sees then in the next three to five years or more. so yes, some are not COMPLETE players but they all are very good, some with more potential than others. Usually, the A players are drafted however. I said usually.
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:25 am
by hockeyeast223
How significant is this list? Is it used only by NHL CS or do college coaches use it to guide recruiting?
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:44 am
by hockey nut
I would say ay this point that there are no overrated "A" players. These kids have been watched for a long time by alot of NHL scouts to recieve this tag. I would say that they all should be very proud to be listed, but the work has just begun for most of them. Congrats to all the kids on the list.
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 11:17 am
by UMDHockey
Anyone have any information on Anders Lee being reported as a bulldog recruit on this page? We haven't heard anything about it but the scouting report says it. I am assuming it is a typo.
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:45 am
by SEC Scotty
Gopher Blog wrote:I listed out the MN kids and WCHA recruits on my blog. If you don't wish to file through the whole list that is. If I missed a few names, sorry.... I was trying to get it done fast so I could move on to other things.

Is Danny Mattson eligible this year or in 2009? I thought I read somewhere he isn't eligible until next year.
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 12:10 pm
by Iceburg
SEC Scotty wrote:Is Danny Mattson eligible this year or in 2009? I thought I read somewhere he isn't eligible until next year.
2009 - He's about two months too young for this coming draft.
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 12:13 pm
by Gopher Blog
SEC Scotty wrote:Is Danny Mattson eligible this year or in 2009? I thought I read somewhere he isn't eligible until next year.
2009.
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 10:53 am
by stickboy1956
Gopher Blog wrote:SEC Scotty wrote:Is Danny Mattson eligible this year or in 2009? I thought I read somewhere he isn't eligible until next year.
2009.
Another A player for UND in 2009 - from Minnesota to boot.

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 12:06 pm
by Gopher Blog
stickboy1956 wrote:Gopher Blog wrote:SEC Scotty wrote:Is Danny Mattson eligible this year or in 2009? I thought I read somewhere he isn't eligible until next year.
2009.
Another A player for UND in 2009 - from Minnesota to boot.

What can we say... Minnesotans know how to develop good hockey players.

Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 9:34 pm
by mch
what does limited viewing mean
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 9:40 pm
by Offside
NHL CSS hasn't had enough time to see the player in the past few months in question to place them (or not) in the A, B or C classification .
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 9:32 pm
by Observer85
Offside wrote:NHL CSS hasn't had enough time to see the player in the past few months in question to place them (or not) in the A, B or C classification .
In most cases it is due to the player being injured and not having the chance to play as many games as others.
Limied viewing
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 4:20 am
by trojantommie
What is meant by the heading limited viewing?
Re: Limied viewing
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 8:34 am
by Iceburg
trojantommie wrote:What is meant by the heading limited viewing?
These are players that Central Scouting has an interest in keeping an eye on, but haven't seen enough (often because of injury) of them to place them in the "A","B" or "C" catagories.
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 6:26 am
by trojantommie
Thx for the clarification
Draft
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 5:11 pm
by hockey nut
What kid from thr"A" list will be the highest draft pick from Minnesota in Junes draft?