Page 2 of 2

Scheduling Meetings are cancelled.

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 10:56 am
by Ontheice
The District 4/8 scheduling meetings for PeeWee A/B and Bantam A/B are cancelled

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:54 am
by Rocket78

D4

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:29 pm
by jackstraw
Just heard tonight that Faribault has now been switched to the East for A Bantams. Will this ever stop?

Stop the Insanity

Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 12:19 pm
by Miracle1980
I was told "unofficially" that District 4 is having a meeting October 7th to FINALLY decide what divisions teams will play in?

As of 10/8/07

Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 3:41 pm
by Frozen Water
According to the District 4 website
Bantam A

Central Division
New Ulm
Mankato
St Peter
Waseca
Albert Lea
Mason City
Owatonna
Austin (I'm pleasantly surprised their fielding an A team)

East Division
Farmington
Dodge County
Rochester 1
Rochester 2
Faribault
Red Wing
Northfield
New Prague

North Division
Rosemount
Eagan
S. St Paul/IGH
Hastings
Cottage Grove
Woodbury (the WDY must of threw me off)
West St Paul
Lakeville North
Lakeville South

If that's true

Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 9:07 pm
by HockeyRocks1
Boy that makes sense have NP traveling to Rochester and Dodge County. This is getting more screwed up as we go along! :shock:

Looks to be True

Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 9:18 pm
by HockeyRocks1
It looks like the put NP's PWA in the same league. That's flip'n crazy for DC, ROCH and NP. It's just 70 miles from NP to Rochester....Sorry I missed Winona.... Make that 95 miles......Were they drunk when they decided this?

Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 3:52 pm
by Pucknutz69
Thats wrong but CG and Woodbury driving to Winona or Lacresent and beating them 15-1 at the Bantam A level is okay?

This looks more like a competition decision then travel. CG and Woodbury should move to D2. D8 should be Dakota County communities and D4 should be the southern part of the state.


Just my opinion.

Re: As of 10/8/07

Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:20 am
by Pucknutz69
Frozen Water wrote:According to the District 4 website
Bantam A

Central Division
New Ulm
Mankato
St Peter
Waseca
Albert Lea
Mason City
Owatonna
Austin (I'm pleasantly surprised their fielding an A team)

East Division
Farmington
Dodge County
Rochester 1
Rochester 2
Faribault
Red Wing
Northfield
New Prague

North Division
Rosemount
Eagan
S. St Paul/IGH
Hastings
Cottage Grove
White Bear Lake Try Woodbury instead.
West St Paul
Lakeville North
Lakeville South

Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 4:20 pm
by hockeystud26
Its actually an improvement for New Prague from recent years. Teams like Mason City, Luverne, and Windom

New Prague

Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 5:45 pm
by jackstraw
Didn't Mason City give New Prague their only district loss 2 short year's ago?

Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 11:52 pm
by Rocket78
Pucknutz69 wrote:Thats wrong but CG and Woodbury driving to Winona or Lacresent and beating them 15-1 at the Bantam A level is okay?

This looks more like a competition decision then travel. CG and Woodbury should move to D2. D8 should be Dakota County communities and D4 should be the southern part of the state.

Just my opinion.

LaCrescent usually only plays as a B team. Last year they played bantam C. They met Rosemount for the championship game. I don't know what level

Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:35 pm
by hockeyfromrochester
our rochester team is so far 6-1-1 our loss coming to Jefferson-Kennedy and our tie coimg to Farmington (First Game)

WE went on to beat
Winona
Sioux City
Luverne
Albert Lea
Owatonna
New Prague

P.S we are Rochester 2

Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 9:46 am
by nickel slots
Hockeyfromroch:

What was the score of your game against New Prague?

appeal to district 8

Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 9:49 am
by Don Morelli
Did Eastview seek membership in district 8 yet?

Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 1:08 pm
by zboni99
Minnesota Hockey board minutes states that Lakeville is trying to move to D6. Looks like it won't be this season. Are they moving to D6?