HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Barnes is a much better individual player with much better moves and vision of the ice

there 3 minutes left are they going to lock it?

easton stud wrote:Barnes is a much better individual player with much better moves and vision of the ice

OK Richard!

easton stud wrote:Barnes is a much better individual player with much better moves and vision of the ice

It's funny, most people haven't seen both of these kids play. I guess the same goes for the other polls as well.

Good stuff Boblee. This one came down to the wire.

I figured the Internet Cafe section at the Roseau Legion would have made a more robust move to push young Oliver over the top. Ladies Night may have captured the attention of some voters

Tyler Barnes has a definite future in hockey. As someone who should know, my job is to observe these kids at all levels of play. Tyler Barnes has continued to show his upside by shining at several camps and tournament games over the summer. While Nick Oliver is an excellent High School player, one more year of high school hockey will determine how good he can or will be. These comments are shared among many regional scouts.

Long-tem bet = Barnes!

Barnes is a scorer. All coaches know it is difficult to find pure scorers. Consistency is nice, but I'll take a kid who can put the puck in the back of the net in bunches and from any angle. As both of these young men progress, the goaltending will be better too. With that said, I see Mr. Barnes with the knack to get er done!

Did someone come on with three different monikers?

One moniker with two posts and two monikers with one post. All three of the posts on one page.

41goalscorer is a scout that felt compelled to jump on for the first time to tout young Mr. Barnes

I got a call to check out this site. There's a lot of good comments with some off of the mark. Just thought I'd chime in with my opinion. That's all it is. Both of these young men have great potential.

breakout wrote:Did someone come on with three different monikers?

One moniker with two posts and two monikers with one post. All three of the posts on one page.

41goalscorer is a scout that felt compelled to jump on for the first time to tout young Mr. Barnes

Heh heh. Some people don't plan this "I'm a new poster" thing very well. Especially when I start checking the IP's they post from.

Lee

east hockey wrote:

breakout wrote:Did someone come on with three different monikers?

One moniker with two posts and two monikers with one post. All three of the posts on one page.

41goalscorer is a scout that felt compelled to jump on for the first time to tout young Mr. Barnes

Heh heh. Some people don't plan this "I'm a new poster" thing very well. Especially when I start checking the IP's they post from.

Lee

Should we call it irony?

breakout wrote:

east hockey wrote:

breakout wrote:Did someone come on with three different monikers?

One moniker with two posts and two monikers with one post. All three of the posts on one page.

41goalscorer is a scout that felt compelled to jump on for the first time to tout young Mr. Barnes

Heh heh. Some people don't plan this "I'm a new poster" thing very well. Especially when I start checking the IP's they post from.

Lee

Should we call it irony?

I don't know if I'd call the practice of multiple nicknames posting from the same IP in an attempt to solidify whatever opinion they hold as ironic. This whole "I agree with _____" thing where they share an IP is more dishonest than ironic.

And then some protest when I bring the issue up. Hey, the solution is simple; each user only needs one user name. Don't like that rule? Fine, Mitch or I can deal with that, also. An IP ban always takes care of the problem when a "subtle suggestion" doesn't suffice.

Lee

east hockey wrote:

breakout wrote:

east hockey wrote: Heh heh. Some people don't plan this "I'm a new poster" thing very well. Especially when I start checking the IP's they post from.

Lee

Should we call it irony?

I don't know if I'd call the practice of multiple nicknames posting from the same IP in an attempt to solidify whatever opinion they hold as ironic. This whole "I agree with _____" thing where they share an IP is more dishonest than ironic.

And then some protest when I bring the issue up. Hey, the solution is simple; each user only needs one user name. Don't like that rule? Fine, Mitch or I can deal with that, also. An IP ban always takes care of the problem when a "subtle suggestion" doesn't suffice.

Lee

Boy I know of at least one Sybil on the board..
I like the one username deal....

Can't Never Tried wrote: Boy I know of at least one Sybil on the board..
I like the one username deal....

Boy aint that the truth

"I yam who I yam and I aint no more"

[/quote]

I don't know if I'd call the practice of multiple nicknames posting from the same IP in an attempt to solidify whatever opinion they hold as ironic. This whole "I agree with _____" thing where they share an IP is more dishonest than ironic.

And then some protest when I bring the issue up. Hey, the solution is simple; each user only needs one user name. Don't like that rule? Fine, Mitch or I can deal with that, also. An IP ban always takes care of the problem when a "subtle suggestion" doesn't suffice.

Lee[/quote]

I meant that as a tongue and cheek comment

I am all for 1 user name = 1 IP address