Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:18 am
The game is at 7:30
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://ushsho.com/forums/
You my friend are delusional. Spuds in running time.fivehole628 wrote:Jags-3
Spuds-2
in overtime
There must be quite a few delusional people then.......Bash Brother wrote:You my friend are delusional. Spuds in running time.fivehole628 wrote:Jags-3
Spuds-2
in overtime
I AGREE - NO RUNNING TIME. SPUDS ARE ONLY GONNA WIN BY 5 !cuda701 wrote:There must be quite a few delusional people then.......Bash Brother wrote:You my friend are delusional. Spuds in running time.fivehole628 wrote:Jags-3
Spuds-2
in overtime![]()
There won't be running time in this game. TTYL
Saves?SPUDNUT wrote:2-1 after 2
Bob- Nobody said anything about how the "Sophs" did at the Schwans Cup. Cuda was referring to the Jefferson vs. Rosemount game - the last game they played - in which the Sophomores scored 4 of their 5 goals. Nobody compared Rosemount to Moorhead, either. I know comprehending english is tough, so I'll just correct what you missed and leave all judgements aside. And by the looks of the score so far, the people that picked this game to be a blowout, or that it would go to running time, are the ones who appear to be delusional(BashBrother).baldbobl wrote:Cuda, If you can't get the game right at least get the saying right. You seem to be fine with judging others on the board when they don't agree with your opinion. Maybe you're the one that's delusional? Mostly you seem to be dodging the fact that is was the "Sophs" as you say that did such a fine job at the Schwans cup. Or, are you comparing Rosemount with Moorhead?
3-1 is sure runnin' it up eh, Bud?Bash Brother wrote:The spuds continue to run up the score
Interesting how Cuda and Schwang attack those of us who actually predict a score to the game.schwang17 wrote:Bob- Nobody said anything about how the "Sophs" did at the Schwans Cup. Cuda was referring to the Jefferson vs. Rosemount game - the last game they played - in which the Sophomores scored 4 of their 5 goals. Nobody compared Rosemount to Moorhead, either. I know comprehending english is tough, so I'll just correct what you missed and leave all judgements aside. And by the looks of the score so far, the people that picked this game to be a blowout, or that it would go to running time, are the ones who appear to be delusional(BashBrother).baldbobl wrote:Cuda, If you can't get the game right at least get the saying right. You seem to be fine with judging others on the board when they don't agree with your opinion. Maybe you're the one that's delusional? Mostly you seem to be dodging the fact that is was the "Sophs" as you say that did such a fine job at the Schwans cup. Or, are you comparing Rosemount with Moorhead?
Schwang needs a tissue.schwang17 wrote:3-1 is sure runnin' it up eh, Bud?Bash Brother wrote:The spuds continue to run up the score
Awfully defensive of your loser jags.schwang17 wrote:3-1 is sure runnin' it up eh, Bud?Bash Brother wrote:The spuds continue to run up the score