Page 2 of 2
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 7:10 pm
by hast-h-fan
Zeke16 wrote:Yea, and Roseville will have 12 scoring chances to CDH's 8, Roseville will have 6 penalties to Cretin's 5 and Rosville will have 22 hits compared to 18 to Cretin.
What??
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 10:16 pm
by hockyman08
hast-h-fan wrote:Zeke16 wrote:Yea, and Roseville will have 12 scoring chances to CDH's 8, Roseville will have 6 penalties to Cretin's 5 and Rosville will have 22 hits compared to 18 to Cretin.
What??
i think that ol zeke is tryin to say roseville will win because they will out play the other "big bad" raiders in all of these categories
eoh boy
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:01 pm
by radiderpuck
dorrr now is being reported as a non dog member so says isd623! gophers sitll have a chance! but that report was form ferbuary 1st!
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 3:38 pm
by wbmd
Roseville will take it 4-2 with an empty netter.
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 4:16 pm
by Zeke16
hast-h-fan wrote:
Zeke16 wrote:
Yea, and Roseville will have 12 scoring chances to CDH's 8, Roseville will have 6 penalties to Cretin's 5 and Rosville will have 22 hits compared to 18 to Cretin.
What??
i think that ol zeke is tryin to say roseville will win because they will out play the other "big bad" raiders in all of these categories
Actually, Zeke was kind of rippin Bob as he was predicting shots on goal.
Sorry Bob
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 5:11 pm
by ChrisK
The first meeting was very frustrating for Roseville, Cretin played very well in their own end and buried their chances. I think Roseville will have some success scoring this time around, they're too good a team to keep out of the net twice in a season but the conundrum for Roseville will be keeping Cretin from matching them. I'd like to see Roseville pull it out, but I have this feeling that we're in for a 3-3 tie game.
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 3:10 pm
by MNHockey75
This one is going to be a totally different game. Roseville takes care of buisness at home 4-1.
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 3:18 pm
by wbmd
MNHockey75 wrote:This one is going to be a totally different game. Roseville takes care of buisness at home 4-1.
Definitely home ice advantage for Roseville.
Re: CDH at Roseville February 8th
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 3:39 pm
by gopherguy4444
it should be a great game but i think that roseville will come away with this one
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 10:28 pm
by DemonHockey13
Tie 2-2 this will make the conference a little more interesting
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 11:25 pm
by pokechecker
It was a great game. Roseville came out slow (as usual) and Cretin took a 2-0 lead into the first intermission. Roseville scored powerplay goal in the second and then scored the tying goal with about 6 minutes to go in the game.
Both teams had chances to win in regulation as well as overtime. I believe Roseville had the edge in shots at the end of regulation 34-26 but I didn't hear the final tally. The conference is still up for grabs!
Roseville's top line seemed to control play much of the time they were out there. Hickey was good but I thought Ryan McDounagh (sp?) was ineffective.
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 11:29 pm
by HShockeywatcher
So much for Roseville's 20th win...

Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 11:38 pm
by hast-h-fan
This is great congrats to Roseville....one more team to screw up the private cheaters chance of walking away with the SEC. I wish they would have kicked their cake eater butts
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 11:40 pm
by pondhockey225
CDH- Cakeeaters, Cheaters? Huh???
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 11:43 pm
by HShockeywatcher
Could've just left it at 'beat a private school'. But it seems you are from Hastings and can't handle that your coach apparently sucks...
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 11:46 pm
by pondhockey225
I don't know about all private schools, but many CDH students are on financial aid or on work study programs to attend the schools. I am guessing this is true of others. Cakeeaters is a stupid description when you look at students from many of the public schools in minnesota.
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 8:51 am
by hast-h-fan
Can we get back to talking about the game please? GO ROSEVILLE
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 9:41 am
by ChrisK
I thought Roseville came out with a head of steam and then lost it when Cretin got the first goal. After Cretin's Al Davis scored the second goal on a shot from the left circle I was worried we might be in for a rerun of the previous game (4-0 CDH) but Roseville started putting some real pressure midway into the 2nd and generated a penalty. Dorr got the power play goal on a nifty breakaway when he got past the defense after a neutral zone turnover. Roseville came out hard in the third but couldn't get anything past Hause until Koehler carried the puck into the zone, dished it off to Wieck, I think, who fired a nice centering pass back to Koehler crashing the net and somehow the puck got past Hause. There were some great chances at the end of the game and into OT, Roseville's goalie came up with a big save on a CDH breakaway.
I think pokechecker got the shots right for regulation, the PA was a bit garbled from where I sat and both teams did have a lot of good scoring chances thwarted by some excellent goaltending, particularly from CDH's Hause.
One thing I liked about the game was that all the top players seemed to play up to their level, Dorr was all over the ice and it looked like they doubleshifted him and some of the other first liners while Hickey regularly caused conundrums for Roseville's D. McDonagh played just fine from what I saw, I couldn't count how many times he'd fake a slap shot from the point, get the Roseville player on the ice and then pull up and go around him for a better shot. And it wasn't just the top players, Cretin's Al Davis, on their second line, had a good game with a score and an assist and Roseville's no.7 made some great moves to get around two defenseman for a good scoring chance late in the game.
Unlike the first game there weren't many penalties, the first came in the 2nd period and I think there may have only been two or three total. It was nice to see the refs let 'em play and it really was a pretty clean game until the end and OT. And that's where the problems started, the refs let some things go on both sides at the end of the game that could have been called.
A fun game to watch, good to see packerboy even if it was only for a short while.
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 9:45 am
by TTpuckster
ChrisK wrote:I thought Roseville came out with a head of steam and then lost it when Cretin got the first goal. After Cretin's Al Davis scored the second goal on a shot from the left circle I was worried we might be in for a rerun of the previous game (4-0 CDH) but Roseville started putting some real pressure midway into the 2nd and generated a penalty. Dorr got the power play goal on a nifty breakaway when he got past the defense after a neutral zone turnover. Roseville came out hard in the third but couldn't get anything past Hause until Koehler carried the puck into the zone, dished it off to Wieck, I think, who fired a nice centering pass back to Koehler crashing the net and somehow the puck got past Hause. There were some great chances at the end of the game and into OT, Roseville's goalie came up with a big save on a CDH breakaway.
I think pokechecker got the shots right for regulation, the PA was a bit garbled from where I sat and both teams did have a lot of good scoring chances thwarted by some excellent goaltending, particularly from CDH's Hause.
One thing I liked about the game was that all the top players seemed to play up to their level, Dorr was all over the ice and it looked like they doubleshifted him and some of the other first liners while Hickey regularly caused conundrums for Roseville's D. McDonagh played just fine from what I saw, I couldn't count how many times he'd fake a slap shot from the point, get the Roseville player on the ice and then pull up and go around him for a better shot. And it wasn't just the top players, Cretin's Al Davis, on their second line, had a good game with a score and an assist and Roseville's no.7 made some great moves to get around two defenseman for a good scoring chance late in the game.
Unlike the first game there weren't many penalties, the first came in the 2nd period and I think there may have only been two or three total. It was nice to see the refs let 'em play and it really was a pretty clean game until the end and OT. And that's where the problems started, the refs let some things go on both sides at the end of the game that could have been called.
A fun game to watch, good to see packerboy even if it was only for a short while.
Great description Chris.
Sounds like 2 really good teams went at it.
Makes me wish I couldv'e been there.

Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:13 pm
by Zeke16
"Can we get back to talking about the game please? GO ROSEVILLE"
Hasty, you're the Bozo who got off the topic and had to talk about the "cakeaters" Duh
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 2:07 pm
by hast-h-fan
Zeke16 wrote:"Can we get back to talking about the game please? GO ROSEVILLE"
Hasty, you're the Bozo who got off the topic and had to talk about the "cakeaters" Duh
Try to concentrate on the thread or go back to your fourth hour class kiddo.