Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:26 am
whats the seating capacity at blue mound notTONIGHT? rinkfinder doesn't seem to have the rink on their website.
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://ushsho.com/forums/
The top three teams in the section are NOT in fact Luverne, Hutch and New Ulm. it is Luverne, Willmar and new Ulm. Hutch is overrated and has a sub par goaltender in Allan (sp?) I see New Ulm lighting him up for at least 4 tonight. This section comes down to what goaltender is playing well at the end of the year heading into sections. As of right now, I see Meyer for Luverne and Goosman for Willmar being the front runners. Willmar just beat a good Fergus Falls team. Also interested to see what the seating capacity at Blue Mound is. I know Hutch is around 700, Willmar is approximately 3,000, Litch is around 600 and NU is around a grand.Iranger33 wrote:Please don't lump me in with the Scout, my opinion is that the top 3 teams in the section are Luverne, Hutch, and New Ulm. I went on record a couple of years ago that Luverne gained respect by making it to the section finals. But if that is upsetting to you I'm sorry.gopherfan7 wrote:Iranger33 and Section 3A HockeyScout just need to STOP. Luverne is a highly talented team, so quit bashing them. yeah they play a weaker schedule, but if half the kids in this section played the schedule lucerne plays, they still wouldn't put up 65-75 points like Smedsrud and Norman will this year.
That being said, I still don't think Luverne is going to make it out of this section. Willmar is a very skilled team with great coaches. Coach Tollefson gets these boys working hard all year and come playoff time they will be the most prepared team in the section.
My rankings so far:
1. Willmar
2. Luverne
3. New Ulm
4. Hutch
5. Litch
6. Marshall
7. Windom
8. Morris Benson
9. Worthington
10. Redwood Valley
11. Fairmont
Good additions to the game notes will be interesting to see line match ups tonight. Dont forget Hutch gets last change see if they use it or not. Hutch is a deeper team then you give them credit for and I dont think they are over rated by any means. New Ulm's Dmen will need to be stronger.gopherfan7 wrote:The top three teams in the section are NOT in fact Luverne, Hutch and New Ulm. it is Luverne, Willmar and new Ulm. Hutch is overrated and has a sub par goaltender in Allan (sp?) I see New Ulm lighting him up for at least 4 tonight. This section comes down to what goaltender is playing well at the end of the year heading into sections. As of right now, I see Meyer for Luverne and Goosman for Willmar being the front runners. Willmar just beat a good Fergus Falls team. Also interested to see what the seating capacity at Blue Mound is. I know Hutch is around 700, Willmar is approximately 3,000, Litch is around 600 and NU is around a grand.Iranger33 wrote:Please don't lump me in with the Scout, my opinion is that the top 3 teams in the section are Luverne, Hutch, and New Ulm. I went on record a couple of years ago that Luverne gained respect by making it to the section finals. But if that is upsetting to you I'm sorry.gopherfan7 wrote:Iranger33 and Section 3A HockeyScout just need to STOP. Luverne is a highly talented team, so quit bashing them. yeah they play a weaker schedule, but if half the kids in this section played the schedule lucerne plays, they still wouldn't put up 65-75 points like Smedsrud and Norman will this year.
That being said, I still don't think Luverne is going to make it out of this section. Willmar is a very skilled team with great coaches. Coach Tollefson gets these boys working hard all year and come playoff time they will be the most prepared team in the section.
My rankings so far:
1. Willmar
2. Luverne
3. New Ulm
4. Hutch
5. Litch
6. Marshall
7. Windom
8. Morris Benson
9. Worthington
10. Redwood Valley
11. Fairmont
Good game tonight in Hutch. I see NU's forwards finally exploding for some points and Kraus finding his stride in net. Look for Davis and Reinharts (younger brother of Kyle?) to shut down Hutch's top line. After that, Hutch falls off in depth way too much to keep up with NU.
I see the Litch vs. Redwood game being a blow out. Not much to talk about here. Look for Stromberg to have a nice night for Litch. He seems to look like a good player for them.
Marshall vs. Windom is the game I will be most interested in tonight. With Litch and Hutch both blowing out Windom, it will really show how Marshall compares to the other two this year. I see this being a 5-3 game, going in Marshall's favor. Depending what goalie plays for Windom. If Monson plays, this game could get out of hand. He struggles to make a solid first save, and kind of flops after that.
Hoping for some good games tonight with seeding implications early in the year!
I know they had 1250, or so in there for a Stampede USHL game...bardown27 wrote:whats the seating capacity at blue mound notTONIGHT? rinkfinder doesn't seem to have the rink on their website.
Hutch's D zone coverage was horrible. Krause played great.MrGoalieBoy wrote:Yikes hutch let's in 5 goals on 17 shots? WOW that is absolutely pathetic.......Either Krause got a lot better for New ulm, or Hutch's first line is overrated!! What'd it look like tonight in Hutch?
Kraus has always been a good goaltender. I mean he led new ulm area to state as a sophomore! He just doesn't get help up his defense and does have his momentsMrGoalieBoy wrote:Yikes hutch let's in 5 goals on 17 shots? WOW that is absolutely pathetic.......Either Krause got a lot better for New ulm, or Hutch's first line is overrated!! What'd it look like tonight in Hutch?
Hutch had roughly 6 kids quite playing after their first year of bantams and 1 kid left the program to play his last year of bantam hockey for Woodbury and is now playing for Holy Family.InigoMontoya wrote:I only see 4 juniors (and no junior goalie) on Hutchinson's roster. There are 23 juniors on the football roster, for a team that is 26-0 with back-to-back state championships, but only one kid in the class that plays hockey. Seems like they fell asleep at the recruiting wheel in a pretty important athletic year about 12 years ago.
Big South Conference, eh? Well sign me up as Fan #1 of the B.S. Conference!notTONIGHT wrote:Here is an article about the new conference that will force New Ulm to play Luverne next year. This article comes from the Rock County Star Herald.
Luverne High School athletic teams will compete as members of the Big South Conference starting next fall.
Wow, 7 kids out of about 11, if 4 are left, all at the same time. Odd, for a group that went to regions as peewees, to quit as bantams.Iranger33 wrote:Hutch had roughly 6 kids quite playing after their first year of bantams and 1 kid left the program to play his last year of bantam hockey for Woodbury and is now playing for Holy Family.InigoMontoya wrote:I only see 4 juniors (and no junior goalie) on Hutchinson's roster. There are 23 juniors on the football roster, for a team that is 26-0 with back-to-back state championships, but only one kid in the class that plays hockey. Seems like they fell asleep at the recruiting wheel in a pretty important athletic year about 12 years ago.
Arby bargy!Teak wrote:Big South Conference, eh? Well sign me up as Fan #1 of the B.S. Conference!notTONIGHT wrote:Here is an article about the new conference that will force New Ulm to play Luverne next year. This article comes from the Rock County Star Herald.
Luverne High School athletic teams will compete as members of the Big South Conference starting next fall.![]()
The moniker will be appropriate given the argy-bargy that goes on in this 3A thread.
JUST knowing that you listened to the SQUEEZE would have probably done it, but knowing you HAVE the Album, YOU are officially now my #1 Hero!!!!east hockey wrote:Arby bargy!Teak wrote:Big South Conference, eh? Well sign me up as Fan #1 of the B.S. Conference!notTONIGHT wrote:Here is an article about the new conference that will force New Ulm to play Luverne next year. This article comes from the Rock County Star Herald.
Luverne High School athletic teams will compete as members of the Big South Conference starting next fall.![]()
The moniker will be appropriate given the argy-bargy that goes on in this 3A thread.I used to have that album by The Squeeze. Hadn't seen anybody use that term in awhile. Probably because not too many people are up on British slang, eh?
Lee
only one or two of those kids played Bantams A's their first year.Iranger33 wrote:Hutch had roughly 6 kids quite playing after their first year of bantams and 1 kid left the program to play his last year of bantam hockey for Woodbury and is now playing for Holy Family.InigoMontoya wrote:I only see 4 juniors (and no junior goalie) on Hutchinson's roster. There are 23 juniors on the football roster, for a team that is 26-0 with back-to-back state championships, but only one kid in the class that plays hockey. Seems like they fell asleep at the recruiting wheel in a pretty important athletic year about 12 years ago.