Page 9 of 15
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 7:51 pm
by Savaaaaaard 91
Bdangles14 wrote:really shut the hell up hock1
I Have to agree with Bdangles14. Shut the hell up.
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 7:58 pm
by Savaaaaaard 91
Any big games this week?
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:09 pm
by danglepastdmen
Savaaaaaard 91 wrote:Any big games this week?
thursday's game to watch NU at marshall
marshall vs Redwood
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 9:20 pm
by golfer5
Redwood Beat Marshall in summer hockey and twice now during the season and still no respect. Redwood was short 5-3 for over 6 minutes and Marshall couldn't find the net. 5on5 Marshall could not get passed center ice. Did the Marshall paper see the same game that was being played or did they just get opinions from the fans the next day?
Re: marshall vs Redwood
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 2:11 pm
by sregit34
golfer5 wrote:Redwood Beat Marshall in summer hockey and twice now during the season and still no respect. Redwood was short 5-3 for over 6 minutes and Marshall couldn't find the net. 5on5 Marshall could not get passed center ice. Did the Marshall paper see the same game that was being played or did they just get opinions from the fans the next day?
First of all summer hockey is a joke. Redwood gets no respect because of the way they play, CHEAP. If they dominated so much 5-5 why were the shots about even and the score 3-2?
Marshall
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 2:31 pm
by golfer5
You should worry about winning your own conference instead of looking to Districts, Might have won a few more. Sorry about breaking the banners you had going. 6 straight is impressive, Next time bring your A game.
Re: Marshall
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 4:21 pm
by sregit34
golfer5 wrote:You should worry about winning your own conference instead of looking to Districts, Might have won a few more. Sorry about breaking the banners you had going. 6 straight is impressive, Next time bring your A game.
Districts????? Are you talking about sections? We arent in bantams or peewees anymore. BTW you didnt answer my question.
You win
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 4:37 pm
by golfer5
You win your now 3-1 Vs Redwood this year,
Love to trash talk but need to go watch Redwood play SleepyEye to take sole ownership of the Conference Championship.
How was Waconia ? 2-8 ouch.
Re: You win
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 9:56 pm
by Savaaaaaard 91
golfer5 wrote:You win your now 3-1 Vs Redwood this year,
Love to trash talk but need to go watch Redwood play SleepyEye to take sole ownership of the Conference Championship.
How was Waconia ? 2-8 ouch.
Obviosly this kid is from Redwood....golfer5..pshhh
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 9:57 pm
by Bdangles14
Marshall Loses to New Ulm 7-2........they had 1 empty netter and shots were 24-30 favoring new ulm......i was at the game and the game was much closer than the score
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 10:01 pm
by Bdangles14
Marshall Just did not show up the first period letting 4 in, in the first period
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 10:20 pm
by Ducks09
hey golfer5 who have you all played bragging redwood up so much i dont see you playing a new ulm, hutch, or willmar....so when sections come around, your in for a rude awakining...
Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:00 am
by golfer5
I have total respect for all the teams coaches and fans from D-3
My beef was with sregit34. And how Marshall who had lost too Redwood twice this last year was going to Beat them and Burn down their houses and steel their women. Hutch, New Ulm and Willmar are all good teams. Wish we could play them more.
Marshall is a Good team with great Kids as well.
Sregit34 keep your mouth shut about what your gonna do and just do it.
No I do not play for Redwood Just a fan.
Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:53 am
by sregit34
golfer5 wrote:I have total respect for all the teams coaches and fans from D-3
My beef was with sregit34. And how Marshall who had lost too Redwood twice this last year was going to Beat them and Burn down their houses and steel their women. Hutch, New Ulm and Willmar are all good teams. Wish we could play them more.
Marshall is a Good team with great Kids as well.
Sregit34 keep your mouth shut about what your gonna do and just do it.
No I do not play for Redwood Just a fan.
You havent answered my question.........
ps.
What is D-3??? Are you talking about SECTION 3A? or something else?...
Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 10:21 am
by golfer5
Yes Section 3A
And to your question. Why was the shots on goal even. Yes its shots on goal not shot near goal. Did you go to the game? Your right stats were close.
You also win the Stat for Checking from behind.
The last time Marshall lost a conference title Redwood Area did not even have a High School team, They do now-
Your on a 3 game loosing steak and a loosing record right now focus on that.
Bring your A game to Section 3A playoffs and good luck.
P.S. The kid who broke his arm sorry to here about that and hope he is well.
Heard it was the check in the first 15 seconds of the game I remember that. Kid came off and went to the bench. That is one tough Kid.
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 10:24 am
by Koolice
New Ulm plays Sartell today that game could mean alot in how teams are seeded in the sec. Hutch plays Marshall another sec game that could play a role in seedings. Lets see what these games bring.
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 11:14 am
by ClassicHockey
This section is a joke. None of these teams deserve to go to state...the team that will probably get the first seed lost to minnehaha academy. thats terrible
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 7:37 pm
by Koolice
New Ulm beat Sartell 3 - 1. ClassicHockey I think that Sartell is ranked 16th in the state. I bet Sartell doesn't think that all teams in this sec are as bad as you think they are. Maybe your the joke
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:16 pm
by Koolice
any updates on the Hutch Marshall game?
Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2009 12:10 am
by Bdangles14
Marshall lost to Hutch 9-2........the shots were 22-42 favoring hutch......the first 14 min of the first period there was no score but then hutch got a goal that should of have not counted...the player batted the puck in with his hand..then marshall broke down and let up 3 goals in the last 3 min....then in the second period marshall came out flying out shooting hutch 13-12 and scoring 2 goals in the second......after the second hutch was leading 6-2....then the third period hutch scored 3 more goals making the final score 9-2...
Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2009 12:11 am
by Ducks09
Hutch over Marshall 9-2...alot closer than score indicated---4-2 at one point agree with Bdangles14
Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2009 12:36 am
by hock1
ClassicHockey wrote:This section is a joke. None of these teams deserve to go to state...the team that will probably get the first seed lost to minnehaha academy. thats terrible
First of all, New Ulm was a totally different team then. They would kill Minehaha now. Second, you are just some kid on a team in another section that has realized he's not good enough to take his team to state, so you go blame your bad play on other teams that have a shot. Get over it. PLus New Ulm just beat #16 Sartell 3-1. This section is stronger than you think (definitely not very deep in talent). But the top couple teams in this sec can flat out play. NU just proved that.
Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2009 9:13 am
by iced_out99
hock1 wrote:ClassicHockey wrote:This section is a joke. None of these teams deserve to go to state...the team that will probably get the first seed lost to minnehaha academy. thats terrible
First of all, New Ulm was a totally different team then. They would kill Minehaha now. Second, you are just some kid on a team in another section that has realized he's not good enough to take his team to state, so you go blame your bad play on other teams that have a shot. Get over it. PLus New Ulm just beat #16 Sartell 3-1. This section is stronger than you think (definitely not very deep in talent). But the top couple teams in this sec can flat out play. NU just proved that.
I agree...as of now i think New Ulm is number one i the sec.
Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2009 9:29 am
by Bdangles14
I agree with hock1 also
Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2009 12:14 pm
by wild4hockey9
Ducks09 wrote:Hutch over Marshall 9-2...alot closer than score indicated---4-2 at one point agree with Bdangles14
How can u say that? They lost by 7! even if they got one or two lucky bounces they still win by 5?!? Plus hutchs first or second line didnt touch the ice after 5 min into the third. They also got out shot 42-22