HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Posted: **Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:42 am**

Old Guy I agree with you 100%. If the kids are staying for this, it's not good. There has to be changes.

Posted: **Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:42 am**

pioneers wrote:
That Southwest team is a very selfish team and they don't share the puck well. With their talent, they should be much better.

So is this a coaching issue, a player issue, a league issue?

Posted: **Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:48 am**

I'm not sure, but I know that these teams are all taking 2-3 Min shifts. How many 3 min shifts do they think that they are going to get away with this winter. My guess is not many.

Posted: **Sat Oct 20, 2007 11:24 am**

hockey nut wrote:The game had 6 penelties in the first 2 periods. The score was 6-1 after 2. It had nothing to do with the refs. Shattuck out shot them 46 -19. The last penalty was on there coach for yapping. When that team is getting beat, they start running. I felt like I was at a Peewee game the way some of those parents acted. Shattuck does not have control over what refs the Elite leauge sends. They are not Shattuck refs. They got there ass handed to them last night. Just like I thought they out played Shattuck in Fargo.Quit blamming the refs.

Aren't some of the refs USHL guys?

Posted: **Sat Oct 20, 2007 11:25 am**

hockey nut wrote:I'm not sure, but I know that these teams are all taking 2-3 Min shifts. How many 3 min shifts do they think that they are going to get away with this winter. My guess is not many.

If they roll the shifts at 45 seconds or so everyone gets their ice time and the tempo stays high. Would make for better hockey if the assertions are accurate.

Posted: **Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:30 pm**

oldguy wrote:
pioneers wrote:
That Southwest team is a very selfish team and they don't share the puck well. With their talent, they should be much better.
So is this a coaching issue, a player issue, a league issue?

I suppose it is a combination of players and coaching. Most of the teams seemed to grasp the team concept as the season went along.

Posted: **Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:31 pm**

Northeast 7 North 4 with 2 empty net goals Shots were 51-28 in favor of Northeast

Posted: **Sun Oct 21, 2007 12:43 am**

Geez, and i saw north play great on friday. The usauals score for NE?

Posted: **Sun Oct 21, 2007 10:37 am**

Yes Barnes, Nagel for sure. Sova had an empty netter. Can't remember the rest.

Posted: **Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:36 pm**

NE 9 SW 3

Posted: **Sun Oct 21, 2007 7:40 pm**

oldguy wrote:
pioneers wrote:North 6 Southwest 4
SW was up 3 to 1 after 1st period.

However, the selfish play and 3 minute shifts put SW in the tank...

If this league is the answer to kids not leaving for juniors, then I would suggest that efforts be made to fix the obvious shortcomings

Watched 2 periods of SW vs NE today. I had read about these long shifts and thought that it was an exagerration, but to my amazement, the first three shifts I watched were all over 2:30 and the coach had many opportunities in each to change them up. Problem with SW is it must be a contest to see who can secure the next college committment. NE was a much better TEAM. Man they move the puck and just come at the other team in waves.

Posted: **Sun Oct 21, 2007 7:40 pm**

Sparlimb wrote:
hunter wrote:There was no questionabe goal. SHATTUCK got beat by a better team & goalie(Hanna), on that particular occasion. Why can't people accept, that on occasion a very good team ( Shattuck), can lose to an equally good team (Northeast).

Glad to see that's the team with most of my H-M team on it...

Although I'm sure it was the Centennial kids standing out, right Neutron?

He's going to need to be good this year Sparlimb, he's going to have some young defense in front of him. IMHO Aus needed to cut a couple of senior D last year to keep an eye on the future. All will be fine second half though.

The other half of that NE elite team goaltending duo is no slouch either.

Posted: **Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:10 pm**

davey wrote:
oldguy wrote:
pioneers wrote:North 6 Southwest 4
SW was up 3 to 1 after 1st period.

However, the selfish play and 3 minute shifts put SW in the tank...

If this league is the answer to kids not leaving for juniors, then I would suggest that efforts be made to fix the obvious shortcomings
Watched 2 periods of SW vs NE today. I had read about these long shifts and thought that it was an exagerration, but to my amazement, the first three shifts I watched were all over 2:30 and the coach had many opportunities in each to change them up. Problem with SW is it must be a contest to see who can secure the next college committment. NE was a much better TEAM. Man they move the puck and just come at the other team in waves.

Like you said, the coach had many opportunities to change them up. I've seen the NW team play a handful of times and they seem to be the only team (coach) in the league that shortens the bench consistently and keeps lines on the ice for two minutes or more. I wouldn't be thrilled if I were a HS coach having one or more of my players "developed" on the NW team.

Posted: **Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:56 pm**

suntzu wrote:
davey wrote:
oldguy wrote: SW was up 3 to 1 after 1st period.

However, the selfish play and 3 minute shifts put SW in the tank...

If this league is the answer to kids not leaving for juniors, then I would suggest that efforts be made to fix the obvious shortcomings
Watched 2 periods of SW vs NE today. I had read about these long shifts and thought that it was an exagerration, but to my amazement, the first three shifts I watched were all over 2:30 and the coach had many opportunities in each to change them up. Problem with SW is it must be a contest to see who can secure the next college committment. NE was a much better TEAM. Man they move the puck and just come at the other team in waves.

Like you said, the coach had many opportunities to change them up. I've seen the NW team play a handful of times and they seem to be the only team (coach) in the league that shortens the bench consistently and keeps lines on the ice for two minutes or more. I wouldn't be thrilled if I were a HS coach having one or more of my players "developed" on the NW team.

Shortens the bench?

Posted: **Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:57 pm**

Watched Team Wisconsin Play South East this weeknd same thing there Wisconsin was up 5-1 and they continued to put their first line out every other shift with one time i timed it at three minutes -it was unbelievable coach had many opportunities to change up but must of been letting them show boat for the scouts.

Posted: **Mon Oct 22, 2007 7:07 am**

hcky09 wrote:Watched Team Wisconsin Play South East this weeknd same thing there Wisconsin was up 5-1 and they continued to put their first line out every other shift with one time i timed it at three minutes -it was unbelievable coach had many opportunities to change up but must of been letting them show boat for the scouts.

Show the scouts how this select group can play at half speed?

Posted: **Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:27 am**

I think overall the coaching in the league was good this year. Guyer from the North team really got his team to improve as the year went along. McAlpine from NE did a very good job getting the kids to play team hockey. He even got Tyler Zepeda to come back and help in the defensive zone on an every shift basis.

Posted: **Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:34 am**

pioneers wrote: He even got Tyler Zepeda to come back and help in the defensive zone on an every shift basis.

Good for Tyler.

Posted: **Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:02 am**

Nice story on Pat Guyer and his son.

http://www.hselitehockey.com/index.asp? ... DBAD1E319E}

Posted: **Tue Oct 23, 2007 8:15 am**

Week 7 stats Surprised to see that Southwest beat Shattuck

http://hselitehockey.com/vertical/Sites ... 2BE%7D.PDF

Posted: **Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:37 am**

pioneers wrote:Week 7 stats Surprised to see that Southwest beat Shattuck

http://hselitehockey.com/vertical/Sites ... 2BE%7D.PDF

Hot goalie?

Posted: **Fri Oct 26, 2007 10:45 pm**

NE 6 NW 4
Wisc 6 SE 4
RS 4 GP 3
SW 3 North 3 early 3rd period

Posted: **Sat Oct 27, 2007 6:33 am**

pioneers wrote:SW 3 North 3 early 3rd period

Game was 4-4 at the end of regulation when I had to leave.

So the winner was...............

Posted: **Sat Oct 27, 2007 7:42 am**

anyone have a winner?

Posted: **Sat Oct 27, 2007 2:46 pm**

Poor Imitation wrote:anyone have a winner?

Anyone? Bueller? Anyone?

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

HS ELITE LEAGUE