HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Posted: **Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:46 pm**

thestickler07 wrote:In all seriousness, besides hockeywatcher, who is an annoying STA poster on the forums?

You're right. He's the only one. Just goes to show how annoying he really is...

Posted: **Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:47 pm**

HShockeywatcher wrote:"and it wont be the TOMMIES"

You're right, college teams don't get to play in the HIGH SCHOOL State Tournament.

Atleast he's learned something from last year....mathrunner.

Posted: **Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:50 pm**

Like I said before, you can't fuel a fire and then complain it's burning.

Posted: **Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:55 pm**

i love heated arguments on this forum

Posted: **Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:55 pm**

HShockeywatcher wrote:Like I said before, you can't fuel a fire and then complain it's burning.

Hey... I might be fueling it, but I didn't start it. You just spontaneously combusted one day to give everyone a headache.

Posted: **Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:56 pm**

dangles07 wrote:i love heated arguments on this forum

They're only heated in the company of fire.

Posted: **Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:13 pm**

Oh yeah, you're right, I go out of my way to verbally attack so many people because I have nothing to say relevant to what they are talking about and not respond to peoples' questions directly because I don't know the answer and still want to contribute to bashing for no reason. Oh wait, that's not me, my bad.

Posted: **Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:28 pm**

HShockeywatcher wrote:Oh yeah, you're right, I go out of my way to verbally attack so many people because I have nothing to say relevant to what they are talking about and not respond to peoples' questions directly because I don't know the answer and still want to contribute to bashing for no reason. Oh wait, that's not me, my bad.

Hahaha... that's entertaining. I had to reread it five times to mentally punctuate your writing so that I could understand what you were saying.

So you have a good point, watcher. Most people come after you and bash you.. and sometimes for no reason... myself included. But you can't sit back and say "all of a sudden" people started picking on you. That seems a little odd, doesn't it?

Tell me then, watcher,.. why do people always come after you?
Also... where did you get your HS diploma, if any?

Posted: **Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:40 pm**

[quote="topshelf10"]1. Ryan Kesti said something while skating in the crease. Thus, causing Crandall to over react and jack him in the face.

From what I heard Kesti didn't say anything he was just pissed off and a total spaz out hot head. Oh and by the way I hope every team gets the calls STA did against them in state

Posted: **Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:46 pm**

Seems odd to me. But hey, I just post here. Like I said, I'm going to post less. If people don't attack me I have nothing to defend myself from and my posts would go down significantly. Or if when in this DISCUSSION board I add a question and people continue to spew off their same 'ol point over and over without answering the question my posts would go down if I didn't have to re-ask things that aren't being answered. But you all know this. Just keep your posts to hockey people. Good day to everyone.

Posted: **Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:15 pm**

Could you tell me why Crandall would be spazzing out when he had a 2,3 goal lead?

Posted: **Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:18 pm**

dangles07 wrote:Could you tell me why Crandall would be spazzing out when he had a 2,3 goal lead?

Maybe the craziness of attending a school without girls put him over the edge. Maybe.

Posted: **Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:16 am**

Bash Brother wrote:
dangles07 wrote:Could you tell me why Crandall would be spazzing out when he had a 2,3 goal lead?
Maybe the craziness of attending a school without girls put him over the edge. Maybe.

This is funny, and I graduated from the Academy.

Grow up. If that is all you have then you are in serious trouble.

Posted: **Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:42 am**

fan#1 wrote:
topshelf10 wrote:1. Ryan Kesti said something while skating in the crease. Thus, causing Crandall to over react and jack him in the face.

From what I heard Kesti didn't say anything he was just pissed off and a total spaz out hot head. Oh and by the way I hope every team gets the calls STA did against them in state
that game ws totally even, wat are you whinig about?

Posted: **Mon Mar 05, 2007 2:39 pm**

creampie09 wrote:
fan#1 wrote:
topshelf10 wrote:1. Ryan Kesti said something while skating in the crease. Thus, causing Crandall to over react and jack him in the face.

From what I heard Kesti didn't say anything he was just pissed off and a total spaz out hot head. Oh and by the way I hope every team gets the calls STA did against them in state
that game ws totally even, wat are you whinig about?
Wait... are we talking about ref calls? I'm confused.

All I know from listening to the games is that they're weren't very many penalties being called, period. They were letting the guys play.

What kind of calls are we talking about, here? From what I heard, there were decent refs.

Posted: **Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:05 pm**

Maybe I just heard wrong, but St Thomas dominated right away, then Red Wing took over. St Thomas got a (dare I say) lucky 2nd goal and Red Wing was still dominant for the 2nd (aside from the last 6 seconds. Then the 3rd period was pretty even as far as play went and St Thomas just scored more. The announcers said the score definitely was not representative of how the game was played.

Posted: **Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:09 pm**

STA scored about 5 minutes in, Red Wing scored maybe 6 minutes later. It went back and forth and I'd agree with the announcers. The score did not reflect the game well. If a team outscores the other 4-0 in a period I wouldnt go as far to say that period was completely even..

Posted: **Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:16 pm**

shooter111 wrote:STA scored about 5 minutes in, Red Wing scored maybe 6 minutes later. It went back and forth and I'd agree with the announcers. The score did not reflect the game well. If a team outscores the other 4-0 in a period I wouldnt go as far to say that period was completely even..

STA dominated the whole first period of that game, the 2 goals redwing scored did not reflect how they played. STA had complete controll of the game for the first 8 minnutes, they also started out out shooting them like 10 to 2... the second period was pretty even and the third period sta dominated because of the momentum they got from the goals at the begining of the period.

Posted: **Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:23 pm**

There was nothing even about the 3rd period. RW was crushed by that last-second goal in the 2nd period and came out totally flat. If you read the Pioneer Press story of the game, located here:

http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincitie ... 829429.htm

You'll get an accurate sense of what happened. It's written by one of the paper's Wild beat writers, so he knows his hockey.

Posted: **Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:44 pm**

creampie09 wrote:

STA dominated the whole first period of that game, the 2 goals redwing scored did not reflect how they played. STA had complete controll of the game for the first 8 minnutes, they also started out out shooting them like 10 to 2... the second period was pretty even and the third period sta dominated because of the momentum they got from the goals at the begining of the period.

They had their momentum from the last goal in the 2nd which prevented it going into the third tied. And pal, I'm sorry that you guys didnt get to go into state with a 0GA in the postseason, but you'll have to get over that. Goals are goals. And no, the third wasnt even at all.. thats the point I was trying to make.

Posted: **Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:59 pm**

goalieguy1 wrote:
The consensus in our group is that STA is the 3rd or 4th-best team in Class A, and while anything can happen at state, they are unlikely to win, or even make the finals.

This is sounding sort of prescient right about now.

Posted: **Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:54 pm**

I'm not sure if you were watching, but they lost the semifinal game in the 2nd OT. Yes, you are right, they didn't make it. But saying they are unlikely to make it then saying you were right on when they lose in OT is a little far. Great game by both teams, but claiming that it couldn't go to any of the 4 teams is a little far fetched.

Posted: **Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:56 pm**

ocanadaourhome wrote: STA will gladly take the 3rd or 4th seed just to be able to throttle both DM and Hermantown. Both of which are one line dimensional teams.

Wow, what a hockey genius this guy is....Tough loss for Brokeback Academy.

Posted: **Fri Mar 09, 2007 3:13 pm**

Not really sure what goalieguy1 has against them or who he's routin' for here. Sure, losing sucks, but they'll still be playing against a top team and the X and take home some hardware. Big deal. But way to continue to not only bring them up but also put them down.

Posted: **Fri Mar 09, 2007 3:37 pm**

HShockeywatcher wrote:I'm not sure if you were watching, but they lost the semifinal game in the 2nd OT. Yes, you are right, they didn't make it. But saying they are unlikely to make it then saying you were right on when they lose in OT is a little far. Great game by both teams, but claiming that it couldn't go to any of the 4 teams is a little far fetched.

I'm here at the X, and there's no doubt that the better team won.

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Red Wing @ St Thomas 3-1-07 3A Final

Re: STA/Red Wing Review

Re: STA/Red Wing Review

Re: STA/Red Wing Review