HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Grand Rapids 4 Brainerd 1

GR is now 11-0 for the year. Big tournaments coming up after the new year.

headsup wrote:Elk River - 2
Andover - 1

Elk River - 3
Princeton - 2

Are Anodver and Princeton that good (haven't seen them) or is ER in a funk?

Chisago Lakes-6
Andover-2

Do you believe Chisago is truly a good team now..?

hockeychick wrote:Centennial Red 9
Chisago 1

anyone else get the opportunity to play this tam that has such great sportsmanship (NOT) on the ice and such classy (NOT) parents in the stands, what happened to this group never were never this way in years past. Another fair play point lost, but when you have three in the box at a time pretty easy to do.

are you joking..? Chisago messed around the rest of the game because it was such a joke! its BS! Centennial has no talent what so ever perhaps they payed the refs to give them so many penalties? hmm i don't get it, Centennial thinks they are hot stuff when they are stuck up B******!!! Just wait until next time we play you, We are going to MURDER you. All of our conditioning is going to be for YOU! You are going to get owned at your own arena on January 19!!!!!!

Sauk Rapids took 1st Place in their own Tourney.
Saturday night Sauk Rapids 5-2 win over Superior
Sunday afternoon Sauk Rapids 5-1 win over Moorhead

Chisago Lakes: 6
Andover: 2

Elk River: 2
Andover: 1

Andover: 4
Princeton: 2

Elk River: 3
Princeton: 2

Princeton: 4
Champlin: 4

Chisago Lakes: 7
Champlin: 1

Chisago Lakes: 5
Rogers: 2

Really people? Clearly Chisago Lakes dominates and you guys are afraid to admit because OOOO MY GOD!!! Chisago lost 9-1 to centennial!!! it was a joke!!! look at other scores people!! We are clearly a power house but havent been showing it against the "top" teams in state!!! just wait...

Team S Hockey wrote:Sauk Rapids 6 Anoka 3
Sauk Rapids 3 St Cloud 2

Sauk rapids: 4
Anoka: 4

Highland Hills Colorado 4
Mpls Park 1

Mpls Park 9
New Richmond WI 2

Wow quite the quote after you got done in your own rink.

xxMNSNIPExx wrote:

hockeychick wrote:Centennial Red 9
Chisago 1

anyone else get the opportunity to play this tam that has such great sportsmanship (NOT) on the ice and such classy (NOT) parents in the stands, what happened to this group never were never this way in years past. Another fair play point lost, but when you have three in the box at a time pretty easy to do.

are you joking..? Chisago messed around the rest of the game because it was such a joke! its BS! Centennial has no talent what so ever perhaps they payed the refs to give them so many penalties? hmm i don't get it, Centennial thinks they are hot stuff when they are stuck up B******!!! Just wait until next time we play you, We are going to MURDER you. All of our conditioning is going to be for YOU! You are going to get owned at your own arena on January 19!!!!!!

Snipe how do you think you get to be a ranked team? Play well against the "top" teams, end of story.

xxMNSNIPExx wrote:
Chisago Lakes: 6
Andover: 2

Elk River: 2
Andover: 1

Andover: 4
Princeton: 2

Elk River: 3
Princeton: 2

Princeton: 4
Champlin: 4

Chisago Lakes: 7
Champlin: 1

Chisago Lakes: 5
Rogers: 2

Really people? Clearly Chisago Lakes dominates and you guys are afraid to admit because OOOO MY GOD!!! Chisago lost 9-1 to centennial!!! it was a joke!!! look at other scores people!! We are clearly a power house but havent been showing it against the "top" teams in state!!! just wait...

#11 Woodbury Beat #15 Lakeville North 3-2
Shots in favor of North 21-17 and all three of Woodburys goals were on the power play. Good Game by both teams

Snipe, what do you mean by messed around the rest of the game? If I remember correctly it was 4-0 after one period you must have been messing around from the begining. You dont have a clue to what you are talking about, maybe if Chisago came to play hockey instead of cheapshot, hook and trip you may win a few more games even the remarks coming from your coaches and parents mouths leads me to beleave that player disaplin is not one of this squads better skills. Is it any wonder why out of 7 games you only have 4 fair play points, no one is paying any refs off someone just needs to teach some disaplin over there. By the way who have you REALLY beat that makes you think there so good? See you on the 19th.quote="xxMNSNIPExx"]

hockeychick wrote:Centennial Red 9
Chisago 1

anyone else get the opportunity to play this tam that has such great sportsmanship (NOT) on the ice and such classy (NOT) parents in the stands, what happened to this group never were never this way in years past. Another fair play point lost, but when you have three in the box at a time pretty easy to do.

are you joking..? Chisago messed around the rest of the game because it was such a joke! its BS! Centennial has no talent what so ever perhaps they payed the refs to give them so many penalties? hmm i don't get it, Centennial thinks they are hot stuff when they are stuck up B******!!! Just wait until next time we play you, We are going to MURDER you. All of our conditioning is going to be for YOU! You are going to get owned at your own arena on January 19!!!!!![/quote]

How about we put an end to the Chisago talk and how good they are. If you are a halfway decent TEAM then you would have put up a little better fight than 1-9.

It sounds to me like you have a typical team that doesnt have an A Bantam team. You probably have a couple of stellar kids on the team that you live and die by, and when you get matched up with the high end teams, i.e. Centennial Red, they are able to shut down those couple of players, which is also why you are able to beat up on some other lower end teams. Its like A bantams playing a B2 game. They are going to get 3 or 4 goals each.

So lets just put this to bed for now and until you can come up with a list of 4 or 5 quality wins to post on here I would really like to not waste life by reading about how good your team would have done had this or that not happened.

Centennial probably got physical with your big boys, and you got all hot and bothered. Deal with it.

There is one in every forum, a guy who can't stay on topic and just says ridiculous things to get people going. It is most likely a kid on the team. Obviously, we will see if Chisago Lakes has a team at the end of the season at the state tournament. Centennial Red is a solid team top to bottom with a couple 'bubble' A players. They should be a top team in their district.

Tartan 2 - Centennial Red 2 last night

Edina Green - 4
Wayzata Blue - 3

Edina Green - 4
Edina White - 3

Edina Green - 4
Edina White - 3

Edina Green - 5
Eden Prairie - 2

Lakeville North 3
Rosemount 0

Duluth Bantam B1 Tourney 12/18:

Elk River (ER) - 0
Lakeville South - 2

ER - 5
Thunder Bay Flames - 3

ER - 4
Rochester - 3

(Cons)
ER - 4
Eden Prairie - 1

Duluth Bantam B1 Tourney 12/18:

OMG Crimson - 13
Hermantown - 0

OMG Crimson - 8
Rosemount - 0

OMG Crimson - 1
Woodbury - 0

(Champ)
OMG Crimson - 7
St Cloud - 1

December 23


PROCTOR - 4
CLOQUET - 1

December 29th


CLOQUET- 8
DULUTH LAKERS- 3

This is from the Midwest Regional Holiday Tournament in Bloomington.

Bloomington Jefferson 5, Arapahoe CO 1
Bloomington Jefferson 1, Mounds View 4
Bloomington Jefferson 4, Apple Valley B2 1 (NOTE: We played with the Peewee B goalie, our goalie got a concussion against Mounds View but we only have one so he played the rest of the game)

Bloomington Jefferson 6, Apple Valley B2 0
Bloomington Jefferson 3, Minnetonka 1
Bloomington Jefferson 3, Woodbury 5
Bloomington Jefferson 4, Andover 2

Wednesday morning scrimmage:

EP 6
Arapahoe, CO 1

Some Bantam B1 Scores from the Edina Tourney..

Edina green 9
OMG Crimson (?) 3

EP 5
Chaska 0

EP 5
Wayzata Blue 4

Elk River 2
Woodbury 1

Sunday morning scores from the Edina Tourney - BB1 games:

(WC)Wayzata Blue 3
(1)Edina Green 1

(2)Eden Prairie 2
(3)Edina White 1

Championship:
EP vs Wayzata Blue 2:15p

3rd
Edina Green vs Edina White 12:45p

#12 Lakeville north 4
#20 grand rapids 1

#12 Lakeville north 1
Thunder bay 2

#12 Lakeville north 2
# 9 st.cloud 3