Page 5 of 6

Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 3:31 pm
by Can't Never Tried
hockeylegit099 wrote:HF and SCC big game who will take it
SCC

Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 4:36 pm
by fivehole628
hockeylegit099 wrote:HF and SCC big game who will take it
Are you by chance Laprade?

Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 10:26 pm
by hockeylegit099
i am not but HF lost in overtime 4 to 5.. shots were something like HF about 27 SCC about 15 very good game a lot of defense of errors for HF SCC played good but looked like they gave up for a while........o by the way does anyone know anything about how the kid is that was taken away after the game by the ambulance and if so what happened

Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 10:30 pm
by George Blanda
hockeylegit099 wrote:i am not but HF lost in overtime 4 to 5.. shots were something like HF about 27 SCC about 15 very good game a lot of defense of errors for HF SCC played good but looked like they gave up for a while........o by the way does anyone know anything about how the kid is that was taken away after the game by the ambulance and if so what happened
I heard Earls played one heckuva dirty game, actually claimed the dirtiest player ever by a friend of mine who has played and watched a lot of hockey (admittedly, I wasn't there). So, one's probably got a concussion and the other might have a broken collarbone or separated shoulder...

Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 10:33 pm
by hockeylegit099
He was not cheap they were clearly clean hits cuz he didnt get penalties for them and the kids heads were down... he is also 6'4 220 lbs hes gunna have huge hits they were clean........ but the one kid i heard was really bad that was taken away so i was just wondering

Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 10:33 pm
by Can't Never Tried
George Blanda wrote:
hockeylegit099 wrote:i am not but HF lost in overtime 4 to 5.. shots were something like HF about 27 SCC about 15 very good game a lot of defense of errors for HF SCC played good but looked like they gave up for a while........o by the way does anyone know anything about how the kid is that was taken away after the game by the ambulance and if so what happened
I heard Earls played one heckuva dirty game, actually claimed the dirtiest player ever by a friend of mine who has played and watched a lot of hockey (admittedly, I wasn't there). So, one's probably got a concussion and the other might have a broken collarbone or separated shoulder...
:shock:

Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 10:40 pm
by George Blanda
hockeylegit099 wrote:He was not cheap they were clearly clean hits cuz he didnt get penalties for them and the kids heads were down... he is also 6'4 220 lbs hes gunna have huge hits they were clean........ but the one kid i heard was really bad that was taken away so i was just wondering
Just throwing up what I was told...

Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 10:42 pm
by fivehole628
hockeylegit099 wrote:i am not but HF lost in overtime 4 to 5.. shots were something like HF about 27 SCC about 15 very good game a lot of defense of errors for HF SCC played good but looked like they gave up for a while........o by the way does anyone know anything about how the kid is that was taken away after the game by the ambulance and if so what happened
Well you gotta be a Holy Family player, am I at least correct about that?

Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 11:40 pm
by hock$life
LDC 3
Delano 1

Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 9:40 am
by RLStars
George

Who was hurt for SCC?

Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 1:24 pm
by Dangla12231
The game was really good. 26 for scc had a sick breakaway move
i went to the game and thought that for the most part holy family outplayed SCC but Holy Family's defense was just awful. number 15 and 4 (a captin) are the worst defensivemen i have seen at the varsity level. the goalie stopped tons of odd-man rushes he is a heck of a goalie..
and 10 earls is extremly cheap

Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:34 pm
by HockeyDad2016
This Conf is nuts . . . . you can't pick who is going to win on any given night.

are other conf. around the cities the same way?

I would still have to say SCC has the upperhand in this conf.

but they lost to Delano, Delano played Hopkins tough , Smoked Orono last time they played and than Delano lost to Litchfield?

Can anyone Tell me how SCC's Record is?

Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 4:19 pm
by gotcha
SCC is 17-3-1 overall and in the conference they are 8-1-0 their only loss to delano and a close one with Holy Family.

Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 4:51 pm
by George Blanda
Dangla12231 wrote:The game was really good. 26 for scc had a sick breakaway move
i went to the game and thought that for the most part holy family outplayed SCC but Holy Family's defense was just awful. number 15 and 4 (a captin) are the worst defensivemen i have seen at the varsity level. the goalie stopped tons of odd-man rushes he is a heck of a goalie..
and 10 earls is extremly cheap
Also heard that Earls' dad went up to a Cathedral mother and told her to F off. Apple doesn't fall far from the tree I guess.

As for this conference being confusing, it's really not. Cathedral's one loss was in a game where they put up 60+ shots. They are the best team in the conference without a doubt. The fact that they get wins like last night without a good chunk of their team says a lot about their depth.

Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 4:53 pm
by 2pipesnin
With the win over HF last night I believe that sealed the Conference Championship for CHS.

Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 5:30 pm
by fivehole628
HockeyDad2016 wrote:This Conf is nuts . . . . you can't pick who is going to win on any given night.

are other conf. around the cities the same way?

I would still have to say SCC has the upperhand in this conf.

but they lost to Delano, Delano played Hopkins tough , Smoked Orono last time they played and than Delano lost to Litchfield?

Can anyone Tell me how SCC's Record is?
SCC won the conference last night. Lucas Johnson played outta his mind last night, Delano just couldnt get any past him. I told you this kid has potential. He's pretty much the only one on that team.

Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 9:22 pm
by fivehole628
fivehole628 wrote:
HockeyDad2016 wrote:This Conf is nuts . . . . you can't pick who is going to win on any given night.

are other conf. around the cities the same way?

I would still have to say SCC has the upperhand in this conf.

but they lost to Delano, Delano played Hopkins tough , Smoked Orono last time they played and than Delano lost to Litchfield?

Can anyone Tell me how SCC's Record is?
SCC won the conference last night. Lucas Johnson played outta his mind last night, Delano just couldnt get any past him. I told you this kid has potential. He's pretty much the only one on that team.
I take that partially back... he also has a kid named Barrick to help him out.

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:19 am
by fivehole628
Mound vs. delano tonight. Score?

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:49 pm
by Badger07
Mound 4-2

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 1:52 pm
by MetCenterFan
The St. Cloud Times reports today that Brent Boerger is back in the saddle as the Cathedral hockey coach. It's great to see Brent behind the bench again!

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 2:49 pm
by USHLTender
George do you have any information as to why Boerger was behind the bench? Was Eric out of town or something? Brent's a nice guy and all, but I wouldn't want him behind the bench for an extended period of time.

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 2:52 pm
by George Blanda
USHLTender wrote:George do you have any information as to why Boerger was behind the bench? Was Eric out of town or something? Brent's a nice guy and all, but I wouldn't want him behind the bench for an extended period of time.
He wasn't. The St. Cloud Times is just a lazy bunch of reporters for the most part. George Blanda, aka Bazooster, is a frequent on the Times Story chat telling Tom Elliott how big of a moron he really is.

Also, Boerger was a good coach. He out worked every other coach and had a good strategic brain.

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 4:15 pm
by BlueGoose5
Sorry George, your inside info fails you this time. The Times for once has the correct inside scoop. A reconciliation with Mr. Keenen, the CHS AD, must have recently occured. Congratulations Coach Boerger!

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 4:37 pm
by 2pipesnin
BlueGoose5 and Blanda are about as delusional as you can get.

It was a stupid misprint by the Times.

Boerger is coaching mini-mites in Sartell were he belongs.

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 5:15 pm
by George Blanda
2pipesnin wrote:BlueGoose5 and Blanda are about as delusional as you can get.

It was a stupid misprint by the Times.

Boerger is coaching mini-mites in Sartell were he belongs.
I think I said that it was lazy reporting from the times...and Boerger wasn't there.

Sounds like someones kid didn't play.