teams to look out for next year

hendy1621 · Post by **hendy1621** » Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:57 pm

hockeygy807, judging by your posts, you must be from Sartell. Yeah buddy your teams not real great either so don't be ripping on teams like Brainerd and Moorhead that could probably beat you.

northern skater · Post by **northern skater** » Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:40 am

ya i agree with hendy1621, how canu rip on brainerd let alone moorhead when everybody in the entire state of minnesota knows that both teams would beat you?.... And i dont know if you were in peewees or bantams last year but Brainerd beat sartell like 4-0 in the CHAMPIONSHIP game in districs....<img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/laugh.gif ALT=":lol"> How embaressing! Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... r>northern skater</A> at: 3/16/06 1:02 pm

tunavich · Post by **tunavich** » Thu Mar 16, 2006 12:06 pm

Eagan is without adoubt a team to look at. I think they lose 6 players but there "B" team has some good players and the Squirt team were world beaters.

hockeydude307 · Post by **hockeydude307** » Thu Mar 16, 2006 1:03 pm

Tunavich this thread is for Bantam A not PWA. There is another thread on best PWA teams for next year.

Im A Sniper 92 · Post by **Im A Sniper 92** » Thu Mar 16, 2006 5:35 pm

I think Johnson will be a good team next year.

Ice Dad · Post by **Ice Dad** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:33 am

Maple Grove's issue will be, "who is coaching their Bantam As next year?" They are still without a formal coach.

hockeypuck44 · Post by **hockeypuck44** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 9:45 pm

Maple Grove will be a team to look out for next year. they have 6 returning players.

buddy · Post by **buddy** » Sat Mar 18, 2006 11:27 am

Roseau will be good next year, (better than Warroad). They will be a lot weaker at goalie but a lot stronger in the forward positions. They get some very good players off the pee wee team that is in the top 4 in State.

zata06 · Post by **zata06** » Sat Mar 18, 2006 11:29 am

Any one think way might be good next year. they have 2 returners, but the b1 first years are strong and the peewee teams are doin really well this year.

hockeyguy90 · Post by **hockeyguy90** » Sun Mar 19, 2006 2:21 pm

The only question mark Maple Grove will have next year is goaltending, and depth. They have two kids that can really put the puck in the net, but other than that there is not a whole lot of offense on that team. Hopefully a good coach is hired for that team, they have potential.

LilDuBee179 · Post by **LilDuBee179** » Sun Mar 19, 2006 7:14 pm

hastings

schoolyardpuck9 · Post by **schoolyardpuck9** » Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:44 pm

Anyone know how many returners will be on next years Centennial team? And, do you think that Jordan Lovick will play varsity?

snipes · Post by **snipes** » Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:50 pm

Lovick will return to Bantams. So that makes 5 returners along with the goalie brett larsen who should have been a peewee this year. so if you count him thats 6.

tuffpuck · Post by **tuffpuck** » Mon Mar 20, 2006 6:34 pm

wayta do the math snipes<img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/pimp.gif ALT=":hat">

schoolyardpuck9 · Post by **schoolyardpuck9** » Mon Mar 20, 2006 9:28 pm

Wow, with Lovick returning to Bantams he will be unstoppable. If nobody can stop him when hes a first year, I cant even imagine what it will be like next year.

nipeshow17 · Post by **nipeshow17** » Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:10 pm

schoolyardpuck9... im not gonna lie, lovick is very good, but you have to take into consideration that he was playing with pitlick, and another good kid, which made him very good, even though he still is the best first year no doubt about it, but for example: if he was playing with Hatch from Edina or someone who is not the brightest and doesnt pass, he would not nearly be as good as he was this year. P.S im gonna nail him next year, so he better watch out.

grizisastud · Post by **grizisastud** » Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:54 pm

I agree with you nipeshow. I think Charlie Taft from Edina could be very unstoppalbe next year. Put him with two playmakers, he'll get over 75 goals. Taft is a dangler and will only get better.

tender33 · Post by **tender33** » Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:35 pm

taft is probably in the top 3 for 1st years along w/ nick mattson and jordan lovick. he is a good scorer and has good size and it didnt hurt that he was playing w/ a bunch of allstars during the season

schoolyardpuck9 · Post by **schoolyardpuck9** » Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:02 pm

nipeshow17: Sure lovick had help from pitlick and hess, but if you saw a lot his goals they were just pure talent. Like vs. Edina, he scored the two biggest goals for them (3rd and 4th) and both of them were a valiant effort that he gave. On both of those goals, I don't think his teammates helped him out a ton. It just proves you don't need to stick him with two very good players in order for him to score a lot, and make things happen. Yeah you would like to think he won't be as dominant as he is this year than next year, but he will be.

schoolyardpuck9 · Post by **schoolyardpuck9** » Tue Mar 21, 2006 8:57 pm

What do you have to say to that nipeshow?

tuffpuck · Post by **tuffpuck** » Tue Mar 21, 2006 8:58 pm

hes from new ulm

nipeshow17 · Post by **nipeshow17** » Wed Mar 22, 2006 4:35 pm

tender33, sure taft was playing with a couple allstars once in a while when one of the players were in the box, but otherwise, he played with hatch the whole season and he is not a allstar. schoolyardpuck9- sure they were good, especially his last one when he walked regan and dangled callahan and scored, but his first one should not have been a goal: first of all it was a bad angle shot, and then it hit callahan and went in, so thats what i say to that

tender33 · Post by **tender33** » Wed Mar 22, 2006 5:22 pm

nipeshow- i no he didnt playw/ them much in the games but, he still practicted w/ them at least 100 times this year

schoolyardpuck9 · Post by **schoolyardpuck9** » Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:37 pm

Yes nipeshow, but lovick has the ability to make those bad angled shots so right back at ya.

nipeshow17 · Post by **nipeshow17** » Thu Mar 23, 2006 4:01 pm

but he shouldnt have made it. callahan shouldve snagged it but instead of saving it, it hit his shoulder and went in Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... eshow17</A> at: 3/23/06 5:49 pm

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com