1-6 Lets Play Hockey Rankings
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 9:18 am
1-6 Lets Play Hockey Rankings
Very interesting White Bear ahead of Moorhead and Duluth East ahead of Elk River.<br><br><br><br><br> <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.letsplayhockey.com/882ranksw ... <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... >Grovetown Scotty</A> at: 1/5/06 2:41 pm<br></i>
Re: 1-6 Lets Play Hockey Rankings
Who votes for their rankings? When you think they can't get any more stupid...<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rolleyes --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/eyes.gif ALT=":rolleyes"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
Re: 1-6 Lets Play Hockey Rankings
Ya the only part of the rankings that I agree with is Holy Angels at 1 and Hill-Murray at 2. Everything else is just messed up. <p></p><i></i>
Re: 1-6 Lets Play Hockey Rankings
Their ratings are a joke and always have been. <p></p><i></i>
Re: 1-6 Lets Play Hockey Rankings
Those rankings are so bad I hope everyone goes to their web site and emails them and completely bashes them for being so retarded. <p></p><i></i>
-
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 6:12 pm
Ratings
can somebody post the new rating on here.... <p></p><i></i>
-
- Posts: 523
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2004 2:05 pm
Re: Ratings
1. Holy Angels<br>2. Hill Murray<br>3. Centennial<br>4. White Bear Lake<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :eek --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/eek.gif ALT=":eek"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br>5. Jefferson<br>6. Moorhead<br>7. Eden Prairie<br>8. Duluth East<br>9. Cretin DH<br>10. Elk River<br>11. Apple Valley<br>12. Cloquet<br>13. Blaine<br>14. Minnetonka<br>15. Brainerd <p>The curse lives on.....</p><i></i>
-
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 6:37 pm
re: rankings
lph is a rag. it's only useful purpose is for parents to show what bad writers they are by submitting stories with their son's names in them. <p></p><i></i>
Re: Ratings
1. Holy Angels<br>2. Hill Murray<br>3. Centennial<br>4. White Bear Lake <br>5. Jefferson<br>6. Moorhead-wrong ^<br>7. Eden Prairie<br>8. Duluth East-wrong v<br>9. Cretin DH-wrong v<br>10. Elk River-wrong v<br>11. Apple Valley<br>12. Cloquet-wrong ^<br>13. Blaine<br>14. Minnetonka<br>15. Brainerd-right... <p></p><i></i>
-
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 8:38 am
Re: Ratings
Say what you will about LPH, but they have some well-respected AA coaches that submit their rankings on a weekly basis. These are some of the same coaches that many of you tout as being brilliant. So they are the "dumb" ones as it turns out. <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rolleyes --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/eyes.gif ALT=":rolleyes"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
Re: Ratings
And they are based on opinion.<br><br>Look at the ratings that 'we' post on this site.<br>Can you find two that are identical? <p></p><i></i>
-
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 6:37 pm
Re: Ratings
just means that they are bad judges of talent on other teams too. <p></p><i></i>
Re: Ratings
Has anyone seen 16-20? <p><br><br>_________________<br><br>BOB</p><i></i>
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 9:32 pm
Re: Ratings
is grand rapids not on their because their only 6-6? must make sense <p></p><i></i>
Re: Ratings
If it's based on record then St. Francis and Cambridge should be in the top 5.<br><br>Also, breakaway shot, If team A is undefeated vs. teams B, C, and D, should team A be rated below all three of B, C, and D? <p></p><i></i>
Re: Rankings
Rapids has beaten 3 of those teams in the top 15 <p></p><i></i>
Re: Rankings
Rapids should at <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>least</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> be 12.<br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :smokin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smokin.gif ALT=":smokin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
Re: Rankings
thank you pucku126. It's not like the GR fans are asking for a 3-9 team with a weak schedule to be ranked. And 12 would be perfectly fine, much higher and it would be unbalanced the other way. <p></p><i></i>
Re: Rankings
You’re welcome GR19.<br><br>As for Rapids, you have to give credit, when credit is due.<br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :smokin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smokin.gif ALT=":smokin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
-
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:09 pm
Rankings
Give LPH a break, they try their best...for the most part they are pretty accurate. look at the rankings some guys on this board have come up with...here's one example that was just recently posted...<br><br>1.AHA<br>2.HILL MURRAY<br>3.GRAND RAPIDS<br>4.CENTENNIAL<br>5.BLOOMINGTON JEFFERSON<br>6.EDEN PRAIRIE<br>7.CRETIN DERHAM HALL<br>8.LAKEVILLE NORTH<br>9.ROSEAU<br>10.BRAINERD<br><br>Grand Rapids 3? <br>Moorhead where?<br>WBL where? <br>Lakeville North 8?<br>Eden Prairie 6? <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... berosum</A> at: 1/5/06 7:39 pm<br></i>
Re: Rankings
I wouldn't take those rankings too seriously... the only reason why he put Grand Rapids at No.3 was for sympathy... I know this because it says so right by the name Grand Rapids. <br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>(SYMPATHY VOTE FOR GR19)<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Plus I agree the Spuds and the Bears should be up there too but he may have forgotten them? Just don't forget these are other people's opinions... not everyone is going to agree.<br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :smokin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smokin.gif ALT=":smokin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
GR19
GR19 & PuckU<br> Are you guys for real? You say a team like CDH being number 9 is crazy, however grand rapids should be AT WORST 12. From what I hear grand rapids is 6-6, even with a tough schedule. CDH is 11-1 now, with a 5-0 record in a highly respected Suburban East Conference. I think 9 for CDH is a decent position for them in the state. Grand Rapids being any where near them, maybe even ahead in the rankings is just absurd. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... 6>sfg16</A> at: 1/7/06 3:35 pm<br></i>
-
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2003 11:11 pm
you wanna know what's absurd?
I'll tell you what's absurd. People getting bent out of shape because they think that rankings actually mean something. <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :\ --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/ohwell.gif ALT=":\"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
Re: Rankings
<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>GR19 & PuckU<br>Are you guys for real? You say a team like CDH being number 9 is crazy, however grand rapids should be AT WORST 12. From what I hear grand rapids is 6-6, even with a tough schedule. CDH is 11-1 now, with a 5-0 record in a highly respected Suburban East Conference. I think 9 for CDH is a decent position for them in the state. Grand Rapids being any where near them, maybe even ahead in the rankings is just absurd.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br>I never said anything about CDH being ranked 9 was crazy... they should be ranked higher based on their record and accomplishments you stated above. Plus Rapids should be ranked 12 regardless of a 6-6 record. <br>Look at who they <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>defeated:</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Cloquet (4-3), Brainerd (4-2), Elk River (3-2), and Lakeville North (2-1)<br>Plus in some of the games <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>they did lose</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->, they were not far behind… <br>Apple Valley (1-0), Moorhead (4-2), Eden Prairie (2-1).<br>These loses indicate Rapids was still in the game and they were not out matched by higher ranked teams in the state.<br><br>Read the posts carefully buddy and THINK. PLUS like what I said before: WE ALL HAVE DIFFERENT OPINIONS!!! <br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :smokin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smokin.gif ALT=":smokin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>