Saturday Jan. 10th Scores and Updates...

Teak · Post by **Teak** » Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:51 pm

karl(east) wrote:Anything on Cloquet-Edina or Woodbury-CDH?

I heard that it finished Edina 9-0 over Cloquet.

Post by **karl(east)** » Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:52 pm

OK thanks for the updates.

selloutcrowd99 · Post by **selloutcrowd99** » Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:53 pm

Teak wrote:
karl(east) wrote:Anything on Cloquet-Edina or Woodbury-CDH?
I heard that it finished Edina 9-0 over Cloquet.

Gaarder had a great game with 4G's

Indians forever · Post by **Indians forever** » Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:54 pm

Teak wrote:
karl(east) wrote:Anything on Cloquet-Edina or Woodbury-CDH?
I heard that it finished Edina 9-0 over Cloquet.

Figured that would happen!!!

Post by **karl(east)** » Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:55 pm

Indians forever wrote:
Teak wrote:
karl(east) wrote:Anything on Cloquet-Edina or Woodbury-CDH?
I heard that it finished Edina 9-0 over Cloquet.
Figured that would happen!!!

It may have been predictable, but it still brings me untold joy!

Teak · Post by **Teak** » Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:57 pm

hockeyman84 wrote:St. Louis Park-3
Hopkins-2
OT

What is it with Hopkins?? SLP was 3-8 going into this game; not Hopkins year, eh?

ImissMYhockey · Post by **ImissMYhockey** » Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:00 pm

Stillwater 2
Mounds View 1
OT

Mounds View has lost 4 straight and 3 of them in OT against good teams. The other loss was 3-1 against woodbury in a good game. With the recent news about hill and with their tie against tartan earlier today, 4AA is very even and many teams have a possiblity of winning. I would still say Hill is the front runner but I think you could expect 1 major upset in this section.

Sykes · Post by **Sykes** » Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:02 pm

Woodbury 4 CDH 1

Teak · Post by **Teak** » Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:04 pm

ImissMYhockey wrote:Stillwater 2
Mounds View 1
OT

Mounds View has lost 4 straight and 3 of them in OT against good teams. The other loss was 3-1 against woodbury in a good game. With the recent news about hill and with their tie against tartan earlier today, 4AA is very even and many teams have a possiblity of winning. I would still say Hill is the front runner but I think you could expect 1 major upset in this section.

Excuse my ignorance, but what schools make up the 4AA? I know that the sections don't always break-out along conference lines.

White Bear Lake?
Mahtomedi?
Woodbury?
Hill-Murray
Mounds View

help me out here

ImissMYhockey · Post by **ImissMYhockey** » Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:08 pm

Teak wrote:
ImissMYhockey wrote:Stillwater 2
Mounds View 1
OT

Mounds View has lost 4 straight and 3 of them in OT against good teams. The other loss was 3-1 against woodbury in a good game. With the recent news about hill and with their tie against tartan earlier today, 4AA is very even and many teams have a possiblity of winning. I would still say Hill is the front runner but I think you could expect 1 major upset in this section.
Excuse my ignorance, but what schools make up the 4AA? I know that the sections don't always break-out along conference lines.

White Bear Lake?
Mahtomedi?
Woodbury?
Hill-Murray
Mounds View

help me out here

Hill
WBL
Roseville
Stillwater
Mounds View
St. Paul Johnson
Tartan
North St. Paul
St. Paul Como Park

Funny you asked because I just looked it up haha

Teak · Post by **Teak** » Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:13 pm

ImissMYhockey wrote:
Teak wrote:
ImissMYhockey wrote:Stillwater 2
Mounds View 1
OT

Mounds View has lost 4 straight and 3 of them in OT against good teams. The other loss was 3-1 against woodbury in a good game. With the recent news about hill and with their tie against tartan earlier today, 4AA is very even and many teams have a possiblity of winning. I would still say Hill is the front runner but I think you could expect 1 major upset in this section.
Excuse my ignorance, but what schools make up the 4AA? I know that the sections don't always break-out along conference lines.

White Bear Lake?
Mahtomedi?
Woodbury?
Hill-Murray
Mounds View

help me out here
Hill
WBL
Roseville
Stillwater
Mounds View
St. Paul Johnson
Tartan
North St. Paul
St. Paul Como Park

Funny you asked because I just looked it up haha

So, it just shows that I am lazier than you are!

IMHO it looks like it will be Hill, WBL or Tartan coming out of this section. If someone were to beat Hill-Murray, the HM fans will get to say "But if we hadn't lost THOSE four players....."

I listened to last year's section final between WBL and Hill and it was sooo close. Here's to hoping for a new section champ this year!

hockeyjunkie2 · Post by **hockeyjunkie2** » Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:23 pm

Eagan- 4 (EN)
Eastview- 1

Friedman was double shifting on Defense for Eastview tonight later in the game, interesting I have never seen him back on D but with their struggles lately back there maybe it could help if they continue to do that.

Apple Valley- 1
Chaska- 5

Apple Valley outshot Chaska 41-30. Nanne played in goal for AV tonight. I really question this move by the coaching staff. Nanne has a slow glove, and slow reactions in general and gives up many rebounds right in front of the goal. Gretz is their better goalie and deserves to play night in and night out. Chaska's goalie played very well and I was impressed with their 1st line tonight as well. Hulbert for AV on defense was really off his game tonight didn't play well at all.

blueshockey24 · Post by **blueshockey24** » Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:39 pm

Eagan- 4 (EN)
Eastview- 1

Friedman was double shifting on Defense for Eastview tonight later in the game, interesting I have never seen him back on D but with their struggles lately back there maybe it could help if they continue to do that.

Apple Valley- 1
Chaska- 5

Apple Valley outshot Chaska 41-30. Nanne played in goal for AV tonight. I really question this move by the coaching staff. Nanne has a slow glove, and slow reactions in general and gives up many rebounds right in front of the goal. Gretz is their better goalie and deserves to play night in and night out. Chaska's goalie played very well and I was impressed with their 1st line tonight as well. Hulbert for AV on defense was really off his game tonight didn't play well at all.

Hulbert and Smith from Apple Valley were both suffering from the flu tonight. Maybe a reason why he didn't play so well.

Indians forever · Post by **Indians forever** » Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:53 am

Since Jefferson will be #1 seed in the Dance Rapids will play them first in the Qtrs for a bigtime re-match!!!

hockeyjunkie2 · Post by **hockeyjunkie2** » Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:17 am

blueshockey24 wrote:Hulbert and Smith from Apple Valley were both suffering from the flu tonight. Maybe a reason why he didn't play so well.

Thanks for clearing that up, that could have been a factor for those two tonight.

Iceburg · Post by **Iceburg** » Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:05 am

Shattuck 6, Culver Academy 4

PuckTime · Post by **PuckTime** » Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:22 am

Indians forever wrote:Since Jefferson will be #1 seed in the Dance Rapids will play them first in the Qtrs for a bigtime re-match!!!

Indians - I like your attitude!
I think GR's tough schedule and ups and downs this year will certainly help them come sections. They have talent and are coming together as a team a bit more with every game.
Here's to hoping they'll get the W's when they really count!