Burnsville "A" Thanksgiving Tournament

Discussion of Minnesota Youth Hockey

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Fiveh0le10
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 9:18 pm

Post by Fiveh0le10 »

Minnetonka Bantam A win

Minnetonka 5
Champlin Park 0
Statsman101
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:02 am

Post by Statsman101 »

[quote="Broke Goalie Dad"]PWA Championship:

Burnsville 1
Lakeville South 0

Shots were even at 20 a piece.
Last edited by Statsman101 on Sat Mar 15, 2008 1:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
jackstraw
Posts: 316
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 12:58 pm

LS

Post by jackstraw »

So I am guessing that with your logic that Lakeville So. was the 7th best team in the tourney.
Statsman101
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:02 am

Re: LS

Post by Statsman101 »

yes
Last edited by Statsman101 on Sat Mar 15, 2008 1:19 am, edited 2 times in total.
really?
Posts: 76
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 10:33 pm

Post by really? »

From a Lakeville dad: (peewee)

If the home team didn't "set themselves' up" a little bit, I'd think they were crazy... It's part of being in a tournament and always has been.

If we had to lose, there was no one there I'd rather have our team lose to. Burnsville's teams always impress me as tough and gritty without being cheap.

Their goalie played a solid game and they were well coached.

Yah - yah.... The refs were a little questionable at times over the weekend - that, also, is part of the game.

I appreciated a fun and well run tournament in a nice arena.
oldtimer64
Posts: 162
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:15 am

Post by oldtimer64 »

Statsman101

What's your deal did you have a bad day today you've been negative all day today, why would you come on here and say you hate a team that's pretty strong statement about 11-12 yrold kids.
Statsman101
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:02 am

Post by Statsman101 »

sorry
Last edited by Statsman101 on Sat Mar 15, 2008 1:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Don Morelli
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 2:11 am

statsman

Post by Don Morelli »

Statsman

I am glad you are supporting your team. Consider doing it in a more respectful manner. It appears Rosemount has over achieved this year at peewees. Looks like the board member/coach is paying off. Hopefully you won't let those special players slip off to the Fire anymore :-)

I saw you parading around the rink this weekend. You should relax a little. I didn't see any kids sign any deals, or get told they won't play after peewees this weekend. Things will get better off of Hwy 3, it will only be a matter of time before you have the right people in place.
Statsman101
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:02 am

Re: statsman

Post by Statsman101 »

Don Morelli wrote:Statsman

I am glad you are supporting your team. Consider doing it in a more respectful manner. It appears Rosemount has over achieved this year at peewees. Looks like the board member/coach is paying off. Hopefully you won't let those special players slip off to the Fire anymore :-)

I saw you parading around the rink this weekend. You should relax a little. I didn't see any kids sign any deals, or get told they won't play after peewees this weekend. Things will get better off of Hwy 3, it will only be a matter of time before you have the right people in place.
I don't get how we have over Achieved in your mind. We played good in 1 game vs Eastview. We lost 4-2 to Burnsville. A Team just like ours that can hang with most teams & will Struggle at times with teams they should beat. Just like we both did against Cambridge. All I said was they would have struggled in any other pool. I would have said the same thing if Rosemount would have advanced. They took advantage of the way they set Tourney up. Like a good share of teams do. I would put My team in the toughest bracket with the best Teams because you will need to beat them anyway to win the Championship.

Pararding around what the hell are you talking about. We won 1 game and lost 2 . My Kid doesn't even play AAA so I'am not sure what the hell you are talking about. Signing Players? If more kids go to the fire great for them if that's what they want out of life go for it. Who are we to judge. Plus My kid has a better chance to play H.S. for Rosemount if More kids leave. Which is the only goal WE HAVE FOR OUR CHILD. So again if you think you know me then come up and say Hi. I won't bite. I don't think my kid will be in the NHL if thats the way you are trying to portray me.

Please if you have an Issue with our Coach take it up with Him. I'am sure he can shine some light on any issue you have with Board. Thank You
SubAverageHockeyFan
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 10:23 am

Post by SubAverageHockeyFan »

hitsomebody wrote: What they fail to inform you is how many 3 on 5 goals were scored. D6 refs. very very bad. I truly believe MN hockey is trying to put an end to hitting.
Just my option.
If you look at the bantam penalty minutes from pool play (3 games) the three D6 teams averaged 20 minutes. The nine non-D6 teams averaged 32 penalty minutes. Thats 60% more than the D6 teams.
Last edited by SubAverageHockeyFan on Tue Nov 27, 2007 7:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
Don Morelli
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 2:11 am

statsman1

Post by Don Morelli »

Statsman
Why are you so upset that you lost your best goalie ever to the Fire? :-)
Relax...everything will come together soon.
Post Reply