Links to Team Websites
Scores through February 8, 2014
Wisconsin scores provided by WisconsinPrepHockey.Net
2012-2013 Final Ranking
Previous Ranking
Mismatch games (between teams rated more than 4 goals apart) are not used in ratings calculations.
2012 State Champs: Central Wisconsin
Wisconsin
RANK TEAM W L T >4 GmPerf Sched Total Last5 Section
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,Central Wisconsin,WI,_______________ 18 4 1, 6 1.6, 10.0, 11.55, 11.28 ,2
2,University School,WI,_______________ 19 2 1, 7 2.3, 8.7, 11.02, 11.09 ,4
3,Bay Area,WI,________________________ 20 1 0, 8 2.6, 8.4, 10.97, 11.41 ,4
4,Hayward/Spooner,WI,_________________ 15 6 0, 5 0.3, 10.4, 10.72, 10.88 ,1
5,Onalaska,WI,________________________ 14 6 0, 5 0.7, 9.8, 10.56, 10.65 ,3
6,St Croix Valley,WI,_________________ 16 6 1, 0 1.6, 8.6, 10.16, 10.02 ,1
7,Hudson,WI,__________________________ 13 6 2, 2 0.8, 8.3, 9.09, 9.62 ,1
8,Sun Prairie,WI,_____________________ 10 10 2, 3 -0.3, 8.9, 8.56, 8.25 ,3
9,Northland Pines,WI,_________________ 16 4 1, 5 1.4, 7.1, 8.50, 7.43 ,2
10,Appleton United,WI,_________________ 13 6 1, 2 0.5, 7.9, 8.44, 8.24 ,4
11,WSFLG,WI,___________________________ 9 7 2, 2 0.4, 8.0, 8.38, 7.69 ,1
12,Metro Lynx,WI,______________________ 14 6 2, 3 0.6, 7.5, 8.18, 8.86 ,3
13,Superior,WI,________________________ 9 9 0, 1 -0.2, 8.2, 7.96, 8.47 ,1
14,Icebergs,WI,________________________ 12 8 2, 3 0.4, 7.5, 7.88, 8.64 ,3
15,Fond du Lac,WI,_____________________ 8 11 1, 3 -0.5, 7.5, 7.00, 7.07 ,4
16,Point-Rapids,WI,____________________ 10 7 3, 5 0.3, 6.6, 6.83, 7.41 ,2
17,New Richmond,WI,____________________ 6 12 0, 1 -1.2, 7.9, 6.73, 6.11 ,1
18,Fox Cities,WI,______________________ 12 8 1, 3 -0.3, 7.0, 6.67, 6.28 ,4
19,Rock County,WI,_____________________ 12 9 2, 4 -0.2, 6.8, 6.65, 6.03 ,3
20,Eau Claire-Altoona,WI,______________ 5 14 2, 5 -1.1, 7.5, 6.40, 5.70 ,1
21,Badger Thunder,WI,__________________ 10 9 1, 5 -0.2, 6.5, 6.29, 6.01 ,3
22,Chippewa Falls/Menomonie,WI,________ 4 16 0, 7 -2.1, 8.0, 5.93, 6.31 ,1
23,Northern Edge,WI,___________________ 14 6 2, 3 1.2, 4.7, 5.87, 6.51 ,2
24,Brookfield,WI,______________________ 6 14 0, 4 -0.2, 4.8, 4.56, 3.75 ,4
25,Lakeshore Lightning,WI,_____________ 4 8 0, 0 -0.8, 5.3, 4.56, 4.22 ,
26,Tomahawk,WI,________________________ 9 11 0, 1 -0.1, 4.5, 4.44, 4.93 ,2
27,Marshfield,WI,______________________ 5 13 0, 2 -0.7, 5.0, 4.34, 4.97 ,2
28,Black River Falls,WI,_______________ 5 15 0, 5 -1.2, 5.0, 3.75, 3.58 ,3
* ,Marinette/Menominee,WI,_____________ 1 2 0, 1 -0.5, 4.0, 3.55, ,
30,Waupaca,WI,_________________________ 3 18 1, 6 -1.9, 4.7, 2.77, 2.53 ,4
31,Lakeland,WI,________________________ 7 16 0, 5 -1.6, 3.0, 1.42, 1.98 ,2
32,Arrowhead,WI,_______________________ 3 15 0, 8 -2.0, 3.3, 1.28, 1.38 ,4
33,Medford,WI,_________________________ 2 18 0, 8 -1.7, 2.6, 0.85, 1.22 ,2
34,Beaver Dam/Randolph,WI,_____________ 0 17 0, 8 -2.7, 2.7, 0.07, -0.29 ,4
* ,Viroqua,WI,_________________________ 0 12 0, 10 -4.0, 3.8, -0.25, ,3
Wisconsin Section 1
RANK TEAM W L T >4 GmPerf Sched Total Last5 Section
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,Hayward/Spooner,WI,_________________ 15 6 0, 5 0.3, 10.4, 10.72, 10.88 ,1
2,St Croix Valley,WI,_________________ 16 6 1, 0 1.6, 8.6, 10.16, 10.02 ,1
3,Hudson,WI,__________________________ 13 6 2, 2 0.8, 8.3, 9.09, 9.62 ,1
4,WSFLG,WI,___________________________ 9 7 2, 2 0.4, 8.0, 8.38, 7.69 ,1
5,Superior,WI,________________________ 9 9 0, 1 -0.2, 8.2, 7.96, 8.47 ,1
6,New Richmond,WI,____________________ 6 12 0, 1 -1.2, 7.9, 6.73, 6.11 ,1
7,Eau Claire-Altoona,WI,______________ 5 14 2, 5 -1.1, 7.5, 6.40, 5.70 ,1
8,Chippewa Falls/Menomonie,WI,________ 4 16 0, 7 -2.1, 8.0, 5.93, 6.31 ,1
Wisconsin Section 2
RANK TEAM W L T >4 GmPerf Sched Total Last5 Section
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,Central Wisconsin,WI,_______________ 18 4 1, 6 1.6, 10.0, 11.55, 11.28 ,2
2,Northland Pines,WI,_________________ 16 4 1, 5 1.4, 7.1, 8.50, 7.43 ,2
3,Point-Rapids,WI,____________________ 10 7 3, 5 0.3, 6.6, 6.83, 7.41 ,2
4,Northern Edge,WI,___________________ 14 6 2, 3 1.2, 4.7, 5.87, 6.51 ,2
5,Tomahawk,WI,________________________ 9 11 0, 1 -0.1, 4.5, 4.44, 4.93 ,2
6,Marshfield,WI,______________________ 5 13 0, 2 -0.7, 5.0, 4.34, 4.97 ,2
7,Lakeland,WI,________________________ 7 16 0, 5 -1.6, 3.0, 1.42, 1.98 ,2
8,Medford,WI,_________________________ 2 18 0, 8 -1.7, 2.6, 0.85, 1.22 ,2
Wisconsin Section 3
RANK TEAM W L T >4 GmPerf Sched Total Last5 Section
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,Onalaska,WI,________________________ 14 6 0, 5 0.7, 9.8, 10.56, 10.65 ,3
2,Sun Prairie,WI,_____________________ 10 10 2, 3 -0.3, 8.9, 8.56, 8.25 ,3
3,Metro Lynx,WI,______________________ 14 6 2, 3 0.6, 7.5, 8.18, 8.86 ,3
4,Icebergs,WI,________________________ 12 8 2, 3 0.4, 7.5, 7.88, 8.64 ,3
5,Rock County,WI,_____________________ 12 9 2, 4 -0.2, 6.8, 6.65, 6.03 ,3
6,Badger Thunder,WI,__________________ 10 9 1, 5 -0.2, 6.5, 6.29, 6.01 ,3
7,Black River Falls,WI,_______________ 5 15 0, 5 -1.2, 5.0, 3.75, 3.58 ,3
* ,Viroqua,WI,_________________________ 0 12 0, 10 -4.0, 3.8, -0.25, ,3
Wisconsin Section 4
RANK TEAM W L T >4 GmPerf Sched Total Last5 Section
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,University School,WI,_______________ 19 2 1, 7 2.3, 8.7, 11.02, 11.09 ,4
2,Bay Area,WI,________________________ 20 1 0, 8 2.6, 8.4, 10.97, 11.41 ,4
3,Appleton United,WI,_________________ 13 6 1, 2 0.5, 7.9, 8.44, 8.24 ,4
4,Fond du Lac,WI,_____________________ 8 11 1, 3 -0.5, 7.5, 7.00, 7.07 ,4
5,Fox Cities,WI,______________________ 12 8 1, 3 -0.3, 7.0, 6.67, 6.28 ,4
6,Brookfield,WI,______________________ 6 14 0, 4 -0.2, 4.8, 4.56, 3.75 ,4
7,Waupaca,WI,_________________________ 3 18 1, 6 -1.9, 4.7, 2.77, 2.53 ,4
8,Arrowhead,WI,_______________________ 3 15 0, 8 -2.0, 3.3, 1.28, 1.38 ,4
9,Beaver Dam/Randolph,WI,_____________ 0 17 0, 8 -2.7, 2.7, 0.07, -0.29 ,4
Since some "mismatch" games are not used in determining the rankings, the Sched column can be
somewhat misleading as it reflects the average opponent strength of only the opponents ranked
within 4 goals of each team.
|