Jefferson vs. Centennial rematch 12/30
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:51 pm
Another blowout or will we see a different Centennial team?
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://ushsho.com/forums/
DoubleDeuce wrote:I also wanted to add that at the last meeting between these two, the Jefferson student section was very into the game. Loud, chants...all that good stuff, but I really had to laugh when they did the "Public Schools" chant! I assume they thought Centennial is a private school.
That makes sense. I just assumed the Jefferson students assumed that since Centennial wasn't a school named after a city that they were private. Everybody around me looked confused too. But now it not funny anymore!espnmobile8 wrote:DoubleDeuce wrote:I also wanted to add that at the last meeting between these two, the Jefferson student section was very into the game. Loud, chants...all that good stuff, but I really had to laugh when they did the "Public Schools" chant! I assume they thought Centennial is a private school.
There were Holy Angels players watching the game. When they left the fans pointed at them and chanted "Public schools!"
I was confused as well, but then I looked around and saw some Star players leaving the rink.
1-0 Jefferson at the end of one period. Faust on the power play just over a minute into the game.cuda701 wrote:updates appreciated
Centennial wins it in a shootoutcuda701 wrote:any updates?
nice ID Jeff17.Jefferson17 wrote:Jefferson needs to work on the shootout. Nobody had a clue what to do on either side of the puck. Good game by both team. But nothing beats the Jefferson Student section, full of life, and a little "Sweet Caroline" and "Party in the USA" never hurt a loss.
I wasn't at the game but the Jags were missing 2 defenseman. Thoughts on Jefferson's play?espnmobile8 wrote:Centennial is playing it's best hockey so far. I was so impressed with their goalie, too.
Jefferson...disappointing.
They played very very well in the first. As soon as they started taking penalties the game changed. Too many coincidentals put some of their best players in the box late in the game. It was a good game, Centennial definitely has improved a lot and shouldn't be taken lightly in their section. Jefferson had a TON of chances in OT, at least 5 to win the game. I thought the first half was all Jefferson, second half more towards Centennial, and OT was completely Jefferson. Espn- I didn't think the Jags disappointed too much, at least not with their tournament performance as a whole. I don't think the game hurts Jefferson's ranking much but definitely boosts Centennial's.schwang17 wrote:I wasn't at the game but the Jags were missing 2 defenseman. Thoughts on Jefferson's play?espnmobile8 wrote:Centennial is playing it's best hockey so far. I was so impressed with their goalie, too.
Jefferson...disappointing.
Of course not. Nothing ever hurts BJ's rankings. Their long history and current depths of talent more than make up for a couple of losses to previously unranked teams.toptitty96 wrote:They played very very well in the first. As soon as they started taking penalties the game changed. Too many coincidentals put some of their best players in the box late in the game. It was a good game, Centennial definitely has improved a lot and shouldn't be taken lightly in their section. Jefferson had a TON of chances in OT, at least 5 to win the game. I thought the first half was all Jefferson, second half more towards Centennial, and OT was completely Jefferson. Espn- I didn't think the Jags disappointed too much, at least not with their tournament performance as a whole. I don't think the game hurts Jefferson's ranking much but definitely boosts Centennial's.schwang17 wrote:I wasn't at the game but the Jags were missing 2 defenseman. Thoughts on Jefferson's play?espnmobile8 wrote:Centennial is playing it's best hockey so far. I was so impressed with their goalie, too.
Jefferson...disappointing.