rochester

niceice909 · Post by **niceice909** » Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:47 pm

how good is rochester?
i know they are rated in the top 10 but lost to lv south who are rated in the high teens.
fluke?
i know lv south has a strong team too

niceice909 · Post by **niceice909** » Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:48 pm

sorry this is batam A for all the people who didnt know that

hattrickhockey6 · Post by **hattrickhockey6** » Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:21 pm

they are a good team, the pass the puck well and play great team hockey. If your playing them in regions stay out of the box they have a great powerplay. They deserve to be in the top ten.

SotaH0ck14 · Post by **SotaH0ck14** » Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:49 pm

their powerplay is excellent i agree with hattrickhockey 100% STAY OUT OF THE BOX AGAINST ROCHESTER!!!

woody22 · Post by **woody22** » Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:58 pm

They do have a good PP and they are good at getting the other team in the box as well.

As for Lakeville South beating them that is not a "fluke" because LS is a good team but not as good as Rochester.

niceice909 · Post by **niceice909** » Wed Feb 28, 2007 12:10 pm

no i dont play them

i heart atum peetersun · Wed Feb 28, 2007 3:12 pm

one thing i have to say about this topic. They are overrated! for 150,000 population and only one team this year, they aint nothin special. Decent team but overrated

HockeyRocks1 · Post by **HockeyRocks1** » Wed Feb 28, 2007 3:18 pm

Lets try 85,000 not 150,00. They are a decent team. And again population has nothing to do with the number of good hockey players in your population!

jackstraw · Post by **jackstraw** » Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:36 pm

So you are going to tell us that in a state where hockey is a very popular winter sport, there is every bit as good of a chance to get 15 top caliber 8th and 9th grader's in a town of 18,000 as a town of 85,000? This would be quantitative analysis, not opinion and I think you are dead wrong on this one.

keepyourheadup · Post by **keepyourheadup** » Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:18 pm

The thing that concerns me is ....1 bantam A team ...4 varsity high school programs...if I were a Rochester high school coach i'd be a little perplexed by this one

HockeyRocks1 · Post by **HockeyRocks1** » Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:06 pm

This is like beating a dead horse thru the threads.

A. Very Popular Winter Sport-Not really in Rochester. only 35% or our households have kids. 15% of those household aren't from this country.

B. 4 highschools and only one high school coach that shows an interest in Youth Hockey.

And again population has nothing to due with the number of athletes in your community. Of the 12,000 doctors and 30 nurses how many do you think played hockey?

jackstraw · Post by **jackstraw** » Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:41 pm

I know Bob, he is a great guy, great hockey guy, but how many of the other high school coaches have a kid playing squirt's? Your number game is still way off. You are comparing your population base to the few upper-middle class Metro suburbs. What about the small hockey towns dotted across So. Mn? Those demographic's are changing also; those are the number's comparison's I am talking about. There is a direct correlation. Back to the high school's. Whether or not the HS coaches take part in the youth program or not, 1 a bantam team feeding 4 HS team's is a recipe for disaster. If wins and losses on the 1 a bantam team is your only concern, then you should be in pretty good shape.

niceice909 · Post by **niceice909** » Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:48 pm

ahh what do you guys think of connor fluppel(spelling)? number 16

jitz17 · Post by **jitz17** » Tue Mar 06, 2007 2:28 pm

there pp isnt that great im mean they let up a goal on pp against wbl

niceice909 · Post by **niceice909** » Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:48 pm

ya stop talking bout wbl

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

rochester

rochester

population

LOST?